Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 35(3): 329-338, May-June 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, SES-SP | ID: biblio-1137264

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective: To compare the early and long-term results of patients in whom was performed modified closed coronary transfer with the results of patients in whom was performed trap-door transfer techniques by utilizing propensity-matching analysis to provide optimal identical patient matching for the groups. Methods: From August 2015 to December 2017, 127 consecutive patients underwent arterial switch operation due to simple and complex transposition of the great arteries, with or without additional arch and complex coronary pattern, by a single surgical team included into the study. Of these, in 70 patients it was performed modified closed coronary transfer technique and in 57 patients it was performed trap-door style coronary transfer technique. The patients were divided into two groups in terms of coronary transfer method. In the final model, after propensity matching, 47 patients from each group having similar propensity score were included into the study. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups regarding patient characteristics. Cross-clamp time and operation time were significantly lower in the modified technique group compared with the other group (P=0.03 and P=0.05, respectively). When compared the early and late postoperative outcomes, there was no significant difference between the groups. Postoperative echocardiographic findings were mostly similar between the groups. Conclusion: The patients in whom was performed our modified technique demonstrate overall good outcomes and the current technique ensures shorter arterial cross-clamp and operation times. It may be an alternative method to the trap-door technique for the coronary transfer during the arterial switch operation.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Transposition of Great Vessels/surgery , Transposition of Great Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Arterial Switch Operation , Echocardiography , Retrospective Studies , Coronary Vessels , Heart
2.
Arch. argent. pediatr ; 115(5): 470-475, oct. 2017. ilus, tab
Article in English, Spanish | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-887373

ABSTRACT

Introducción. La linezolida puede causar efectos adversos, como trombocitopenia, que, según lo observado, se relacionan con la administración de linezolida durante más de 2 semanas. Se ha realizado una cantidad limitada de estudios sobre la seguridad y el momento de aparición de los efectos adversos relacionados con la linezolida en los niños. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la incidencia de los efectos adversos asociados con la linezolida, especialmente en relación con el momento de su aparición. Población y métodos. Se incluyeron a todos los niños (< 18 años de edad) que recibieron tratamiento con linezolida durante > 3 días. Se evaluaron los efectos adversos atribuidos a la linezolida y el momento de aparición de los efectos secundarios. Resultados. En total, se incluyeron 179 niños. La mediana de edad de los pacientes fue 4 años (entre 6 días y 17 años). Durante el tratamiento con linezolida, 36 (20,1%) pacientes tuvieron efectos adversos. El efecto adverso más frecuente fue la trombocitopenia, detectada en 26 (14,5%) pacientes. Los demás efectos adversos fueron: elevación de las enzimas hepáticas en 4 pacientes, leucopenia y anemia en 2 pacientes, disfunción renal en 1 y reacciones cutáneas graves en 3 pacientes. Los efectos adversos se detectaron dentro de una mediana de 7,5 días de tratamiento (intervalo: de 4 a 18 días). Entre los 36 pacientes, 26 (72,2%) presentaron un efecto adverso en los primeros 10 días de tratamiento. Conclusiones. Se detectaron efectos adversos transitorios en el 20,1% de los pacientes durante el tratamiento con linezolida. Estos efectos adversos podrían detectarse antes de los 10 días de tratamiento. La linezolida debe recetarse de manera segura a los niños siempre que se vigilen los efectos adversos, en especial el recuento de trombocitos y el nivel de enzimas hepáticas.


Introduction: Linezolid may cause adverse effects such as thrombocytopenia, which were found to be dependent on receiving linezolid for longer than 2 weeks. There are limited studies concerning the safety and timing of linezolid-related adverse effects in children. Objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of adverse effects associated with linezolid, with especially focusing on the time of occurrence. Population and Methods: All children (<18 years of age) who received >3 days of linezolid therapy were included in this study. Adverse effects attributed to linezolid and time of occurrence of side effects was evaluated. Results: A total of 179 children were enrolled to the study. The patients' median age was 4 years (6 days to 17 years). During linezolid treatment, 36 (20.1%) patients experienced adverse effects. The most common adverse effect was thrombocytopenia that was detected in 26 patients (14.5%). Other adverse effects were as following; elevated liver enzymes in 4 patients, leucopenia and anemia in 2 patients, renal function impairment in one patient, and serious skin reactions in 3 patients. Adverse effects were detected within median 7.5 days of therapy (ranging from 4 to 18 days). Among 36 patients, 26 (72.2%) patients had adverse effect on the first 10 days of therapy. Conclusions: Transient adverse effects were detected in 20.1% of the patients during linezolid therapy. These adverse effects may be detected earlier than ten days of treatment. Linezolid should be prescribed safely in children with monitoring adverse effects especially platelet count and level of liver enzymes.


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Linezolid/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Time Factors , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL