outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) due to coronavirus in Al-Ahssa Region, Saudi Arabia, 2015

Between 19 April and 23 June 2015, 52 laboratory-confirmed cases of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome due to coronavirus [MERS] were reported from Al-Ahssa region, eastern Saudi Arabia. The first seven cases occurred in one family; these were followed by 45 cases in three public hospitals. The objectives of this investigation were to describe the epidemiological characteristic of the cluster and identify potential risk factors and control measures to be instituted to prevent further occurrence of MERS. We obtained the medical records of all confirmed cases, interviewed the members of the affected household and reviewed the actions taken by the health authorities. All the cases were connected. The index case was a 62-year-old man with a history of close contact with dromedary camels; three of the seven infected family members and 18 people in hospitals died [case-fatality rate, 40.4%]. The median incubation period was about 6 days. The cluster of cases appeared to be due to high exposure to MERS, delayed diagnosis, inadequate risk communication and inadequate compliance of hospital health workers and visitors with infection prevention and control measures

role of rapid testing and clinical decision in the diagnosis of human influenza A H1N1 infection

To evaluate the role of the rapid influenza diagnostic test [RIDT] and clinical decision in the diagnosis of H1N1. In November 2009, 290 suspected influenza patients were examined for H1N1 during an outbreak in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Nasopharyngeal swabs were analyzed using Directigen EZ Flu A+B kit. Monoclonal anti-human influenza A/B and reverse transcription- polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR] were used. Positive and negative controls were used in each run of specimens. Validity indices were calculated for RIDT and clinical diagnostic criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of RIDT were 40.5% [95% confidence interval [CI]: 33.0-48.5], and 94.5% [95% CI: 88.6-97.6]. The sensitivity of clinical decision was 66.3% [95% CI: 58.4-73.4], and the specificity was 65.4% [95% CI: 56.3-73.4]. The sensitivity of clinical decision was higher in early presenters [79.2%; 95% CI: 57.3-92.1]. The RIDT sensitivity was higher in younger patients [48.4%; 95% CI: 35.7-61.3]. The positive predictive value [PPV] was 90.4% [95% CI: 80.7-95.7] for RIDT, and 71.1% [95% CI: 63.1-78.0] for clinical decision. The PPV for RIDT was greater for older [94.7%; 95% CI: 80.9-99.1] and late [90.7%; 95% CI: 76.9-97.0] presenters. The adjusted odds ratio for clinical decision was significant for cough, headache, and fatigue. The RIDT can be useful in epidemics and high prevalence areas, whereas clinical decision, and RT-PCR complement the diagnosis of H1N1 in any setting

Smoking among Saudi university students: consumption patterns and risk factors

Tobacco use is increasing among young people, especially in Gulf nations such as Saudi Arabia. The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence and behavioural patterns of tobacco use among undergraduate students at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia during the academic year 2008/09 and investigate factors that influenced their tobacco use. A cross-sectional study was done of a representative sample [n = 6793] of the undergraduate student population using a modified version of the global youth tobacco survey questionnaire. The prevalence of smoking was 14.5% among students, 22.2% and 2.2% among fathers and mothers and 43.1% and 14.8% for male and female siblings; 15.0% reported all or most of theirfriends smoked. The most important independent predictors of smoking were: friends' smoking [some: OR - 6.7 and all: OR - 54.9], sister's smoking [OR - 2.2], mother's smoking [OR = 2.1], single status [OR -1.7] and age [OR -1.18]

validation study comparing the sensitivity and specificity of the new Dr. KSU H1N1 RT-PCR kit with reAl time RT-PCR for diagnosing influenza A [H1N1]

A new test [Dr. KSU H1N1 RT-PCR kit] was recently developed to provide a less expensive alternative to reAl time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR]. We report the findings of a validation study designed to assess the diagnostic accuracy, including sensitivity and specificity, of the new kit, as compared to reAl time RT-PCR. Cross-sectional validation study conducted from 18-22 November 2009 at a primary care clinic for H1N1 at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Riyadh. Nasopharyngeal swab samples and data on socio-demographic characteristics and symptoms were collected from 186 patients. Swab samples were sent to the laboratory for testing with both reAl time RT-PCR and the new Dr. KSU H1N1 RT-PCR kit. We measured the sensitivity and specificity of the new test across the entire sample size and investigated how these values were affected by patient socio-demographic characteristics and symptoms. The outcomes of the two tests were highly correlated [kappa=0.85; P<.0001]. The sensitivity and specificity of the new test were 99.11% and 83.78%, respectively. The sensitivity of the new test was affected only minimally [96%-100%] by patient characteristics and number of symptoms. On the other hand, the specificity of the new test varied depending on how soon patients were tested after onset of symptoms [100% specificity when swabs were taken on the first day of the symptoms, decreasing to 75% when swabs were taken on or after the third day]. The specificity of the new test also increased with increasing body temperature. The new test seems to provide a cost-effective alternative to reAl time RT-PCR for diagnosing H1N1 influenza. However, further testing may be needed to verify the efficacy of the test in different settings and communities

Characteristics of pandemic influenza A [HINI] infection in patients presenting to a university hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

A national plan of management for flu-like illnesses was developed by the Saudi Ministry of Health after the first outbreak in Saudi Arabia in June. We describe the clinical presentation of the H1N1 cases attending King Khalid University Hospital [KKUH] between July through September 2009 and identify the high-risk age groups. All patients presenting with influenza-like illnesses [ILI] in the H1N1 clinics during the specified period were clinically examined and tested using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR]. Those who were clinically diagnosed and confirmed positive for novel influenza A [H1N1] were included in the study. Over a 6-week period, 117 cases of laboratory-confirmed cases were reported in KKUH with a mean [SD] age of 19.6 [16.7] years, of whom 72 [62.1%] were males. Most reported cases were Saudis [n=99, 85.3%]; 94 [81%] had no travel history outside the country; 100 [86.2%] had had no contact with an H1N1-identified patient; 33% were aged 5-14 years and 28.4% were aged 15-29 years. The most commonly reported symptoms were fever in 99 [85.3%], cough in 9 [81%], runny nose [33.6%] and sore throat [21.3%]. All 117 cases were confirmed positive using real time RT-PCR testing. Thirty-one cases [26%] were admitted and 22 of those [71%] recovered after receiving oseltamivir. Two deaths were attributed to the 2009 pandemic. One patient died of chronic pulmonary disease. The other cause of death was unknown. These findings indicate indigenous influenza A [H1N1] transmission, and confirm the urgent need for prevention strategies which specifically target children and young adults, who appear to have a higher risk of infection and hospitalization. Such measures include immunization, improved personal hygiene, and increased ventilation in habitations

Assessment of the accuracy of death certification at two referral hospitals

Death certification is a vital source of information used in mortality statistics worldwide to assess the health of the general population. This study focuses on the consistency of information between the death reports and the clinical records [files] of deceased patients in two hospitals: the King Khalid University Hospital [KKUH] and King Fahad National Guard hospital [KFNGH] in Saudi Arabia. A random sample of the records of 157 deceased patients' registered in 2002 in the two hospitals was retrospectively reviewed independently to determine the underlying cause of death and compare them with death reports. It was also to check the accuracy of the translation from English in to Arabic. It was found that the underlying cause of death was misdiagnosed in 80.3% of the death reports. When the two hospitals were compared, no significant difference was observed [p>0.05]. In addition, 81.8% of the accurate [correct] death reports in both hospitals were of patients who had died of a malignant disease. However, the translation of the underlying cause of death in KFNGH was correct in 86.1% of the death reports, while in KKUH it was only 25%, which is highly statistically significant [p<0.0001]. With the limitation of studying only a small number of cases, these results indicate a discrepancy between the file and death reports in relation to the cause of death. Also, the translation of the cause of death was inconsistent in the two hospitals. Hence, there is a real need to adopt suitable measures to improve the quality of death certification

Prevalence of symptoms and risk of sleep apnea in middle-aged Saudi males in primary care

The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea OSA has not been assessed in Saudi Arabia. We aimed to assess the prevalence of individuals who were at risk of OSA in a sample of middle-aged Saudi males, using the Berlin questionnaire at primary care settings. The study was conducted at King Khalid University and King Fahd National Guard primary health care clinics in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between December 2005 and March 2006. Berlin Questionnaire was administered by trained medical students to consecutive Saudi male patients in the age group 30-65 years attending the primary health care clinics, after explaining the procedure of the study. Based on the data collected and defined criteria, patients were stratified into high risk and low risk according to responses. Five hundred and seventy-eight middle-aged Saudi males with a mean age of 45.02 +/- 9.3 year were surveyed in this study. Snoring was present in 52.3%, and breathing pauses more than once per week was noticed in 11.3%. Based on the Berlin questionnaire stratification for risk of OSA, 33.3% were considered as high risk patients for OSA. The occurrence of daytime tiredness >once/week was reported by 35.5%. The prevalence of snoring and risk for OSA is similar to that reported in the US. In primary care setting, one in 3 middle-aged Saudi males is at risk for OSA