ABSTRACT
Background: Neuropathic pain is the most common form of chronic pain often associated with impaired quality of life due to its poor management. Tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and calcium channel alpha 2 ligand agonist are preferred as first line therapy for neuropathic pain. Lignocaine patches and transdermal patches of capsaicin are used as second line agents. Moderate efficacy opioids like tramadol and strong opioids are recommended as second line and third line therapy for neuropathic pain respectively. Previous meta-analysis and systematic review shows inconsistent data and lacks reliability in getting conclusive results in opioids use in neuropathic pain. So, author conducted a meta-analysis to reanalyse the analgesic efficacy of opioid agonist for the treatment of neuropathic pain.Methods: Author searched Oxford pain relief data base, Google web, Embase, Medline and Cochrane library from February 2001 to November 2017 for articles related to analgesic efficacy of opioid agonist in neuropathic pain based on author抯 selection criteria. Reference list of reviews were retrieved using Prisma Algorithm and analysed using REVIEW MANAGER 5 software.Results: Among 1108 publications searched, only 5 trials met the inclusion criteria. Primary outcome measure was proportion of participants reporting 50% of pain relief or better. In five trials, 305 patients treated with opioids and placebo/standard treatment for neuropathic pain, the number per treatment group ranges from 31 to 170 (median 50�. The overall point estimate of risk difference was 0.17 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.33, P=0.026) translating to number needed to treat (Benefit) of 5.9 (3.0 to 50.0).Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, opioid agonist efficacy trials shown consistent analgesic efficacy and benefit over placebo/standard treatment in reducing neuropathic pain.
ABSTRACT
Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) have a major impact on public health. Pharmacovigilance has become an integral part of pharmacotherapy. This study has been undertaken to retrospectively analyze the various adverse drug reactions and to promote the reporting of ADRs among the healthcare providers.Methods: A retrospective analysis of the reported ADRs over a period of 3 years at a tertiary care hospital, in Chennai was done. Data related to the number of adverse drug reactions, the demographic particulars, details on the drugs administered, type of ADRs, serious events and prevention strategies undertaken was analyzed. ADRs were assessed for their causality, severity, and preventability as per the standard criteria.Results: A total of 128 suspected ADRs were found to be reported over a period of 3 years. 81.25% ADRs were found to be of mild severity using the Hartwigs scale of assessment, 71.09% were classified as possible using the Naranjo’s causality assessment, the outcome of 63.28% were found to be recovering from the ADR and 41.40 % were under the probably preventable category. The most common ADRs were the skin reactions. The antimicrobial agents were found to have caused the highest number (58.59%) of ADRs followed by NSAIDs (14.84%) and the antihypertensive drugs (14.06%).Conclusions: The antimicrobial agents were associated with ADRs in majority of the patients. The commonly reported ADR s were the skin reactions.
ABSTRACT
Background: Pharmacology has always been one subject ultimatum and a cornerstone in building up competency, based on applied therapeutics among medical graduates in prescribing and practicing skills. A focus on an integrated strategical approach towards teaching pharmacology for better proficiency in achieving clinical skills is mandatory. Thus, this study has been done to assess the impact and retainment of overall knowledge gained on various domains, based on a revised method of teaching in pharmacology.Methods: An observational, questionnaire based comparative study was done in a medical college, in Chennai. The study included two group of students, one who have completed their pharmacology course based on the revised pattern of teaching with a comparative group of students who have not been exposed to the revised pattern of teaching. A feedback survey was also done.Results: The study results indicated that the average scoring based on the questionnaire was 84% with the students who have been exposed to revised pattern of teaching in comparison to the average scoring of 70% with the students who have not been exposed to the new pattern of teaching. The average scoring of the students who were found to agree to several questions on the new method of teaching was 74% and 22% of the students were found to disagree. 4% of students were non responders.Conclusions: The ultimate improvement in the outcome of health care education can be achieved through appropriate skill building through a simple strategical modification of the regular teaching pattern with an integrated approach involving pharmacologists and clinicians. A refresher course in pharmacology in the final year curriculum and CRRI involving pharmacologists is mandatory.