ABSTRACT
Venous Thromboembolism [VTE] is potentially a life threatening complication in patients undergoing major neurosurgical procedures. There has been a general reluctance over the years to use anticoagulant prophylaxis for patients with head injury or in patients who need intracranial surgery. Intermittent Pneumatic Compression [IPC] and elastic stocking are widely used as prophylaxis against venous thrombo-embolism in these patients. The aim of the study is to assess and compare the value of VTE prophylaxis using a control group with Low dose Unfractionated Heparin [LDUH] every eight hours alone with a study group using Intermittent Pneumatic compression [IPC] and elastic stocking along with Single dose Unfractionated Heparin [SDUH] at the time of anaesthesia in induction on patients undergoing brain and spinal surgery. A prospective case-control study was conducted at Jordan University Hospital, over 15 months during the period 2005-2006. A total of 223 patients were included. In the study group, 113 patients using single dose of unfractionated heparin at the time of anaesthesia induction along with Intermittent Pneumatic Compression [IPC] intraoperatively and compression Elastic Stocking [ES] post operatively were used until full ambulation. In the control group, there were 110 patients in whom unfractionated heparin at a dose of 5000 units every 8 hours was used until full ambulation or for 7 days. All patients underwent either brain surgery or spinal surgery. The characteristics of the two groups were fully comparable except for the duration of surgery which was statistically longer in the study group [P= <0.001]. Deep Vein Thrombosis [DVT] occurred in 3 patients in the study group, compared to 6 patients in the control group, of these 6 patients, 4 patients developed PE in addition to DVT and one of the four patients expired. The observed differences among these rates are statistically not significant [P=0.288]. When pooled together, patients who developed VTE in both groups were older than those who did not have VTE. This difference was statistically significant [P=0.07]. The combination of elastic stocking, intermittent pneumatic compression along with single dose unfractionated heparin at the time of anaesthesia induction is comparable in effectiveness of reducing the incidence of VTE as the low dose unfractionated heparin alone in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures of the brain or spine, despite the trend towards better results of the combined method
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine with the intravenous propofol adjuvant to spinal intrathecal anesthesia on the duration of spinal anesthesia and hemodynamic parameters during total knee replacement surgery. Seventy five patients were enrolled into this randomized study from the 1[st] of April 2008 till the 30[th] of August 2009 for total knee replacement surgery under spinal anesthesia. They were randomly assigned into three groups, group D, group P and group C. Following intrathecal injection with bupivacaine 12.5 mg in all patients in the three groups, patients in group D received intravenous loading dose of microg/kg/hr dexmedetomidine over 10 minutes and a maintenance dose of 0.2 to 0.5 p,g/kg/hr. Patients in group P received intravenous propofol 4 mg/Kg/hr over 10 min and a maintenance dose of 0.5-2 mg/Kg/hr. Patients in group C [control group] received nothing extra to the regular IV fluid. The regression times to reach SI sensory level and Bromage 0 motor scale, the hemodynamic parameters, the Bispectral Index level of Sedation [BIS], and arterial CO[2] level were recorded. The regression time to reach SI dermatome was 149.4 +/- 14.6 min in group C, 152.8 +/- 16.6 min in group P and 209.6 +/- 25.9 min in group D. The regression to Bromage 0 was!84.6 +/- 22.8 min in group C, 190.0 +/- 21.0 min in group P, and 255.8 +/- 36.7 min in group D. Statistical analysis of regression of sensory and motor block was significant among groups [C vs. D, P vs. D, P < 0.05]. The heart rate was significantly decreased in group D in comparison to groups C and P. Sedation levels were within accepted ranges in groups D and P and not affected in the control group. Minimal respiratory depression occurred in group P and D, clinically it was not significant. Supplementation of spinal anesthesia with intravenous dexmedetomidine or propofol produces good sedation levels without significant clinical hemodynamic changes. Adding dexmedetomidine produces significantly longer sensory and motor block than propofol