ABSTRACT
Background: Tibial diaphysial fractures are among the notorious fractures as far as management is concerned
Objective: To compare the outcome [union] between reamed and unreamed nailing in transverse tibial diaphysial fractures
Patients and Methods: Study Design: Experimental study. Setting: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur. Study Duration: 8 months from 1[st] January 2009 to 31[st] August 2009. Study subjects: 210 patients were divided into two groups A and B. Group A patients were managed by reamed interlocking nail tibia and group B patients by unreamed interlocking nail tibia. Follow up was done up to 3 months and outcome in terms of union was compared between two groups. 15 patients in each group were lost to followup so data analysis was done on 180 patients. Union was achieved in 80% of patients in group A while 70% in group B. Our study suggests that reamed interlocking nail tibia is better treatment option than unreamed interlocking nail tibia