ABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción: El impacto social y sanitario que ha generado la pandemia COVID-19 a nivel global permite repensar aspectos de vigilancia epidemiológica y comunicación en tiempos de crisis. Objetivo: Describir el comportamiento de la pandemia COVID-19 en los departamentos y distritos especiales de la región caribe colombiana. Materiales y Métodos: Análisis documental e interpretativo a partir de fuentes secundarias de vigilancia nacional "SIVIGILA" y datos de entes territoriales. Resultados: Cartagena de Indias es la primera unidad territorial del Caribe en presentar casos por COVID-19, seguido de Santa Marta y Barranquilla. El mayor número de casos se registró en Barranquilla, Atlántico, Cartagena y Córdoba. Así mismo, la mayor tasa de muertes por 100 000 habitantes se registró en Barranquilla, Atlántico, Córdoba, Santa Marta, Sucre y Cartagena. En el Caribe se implementaron estrategias de distanciamiento social como prohibición de eventos masivos y cierre de fronteras. Discusión: Para describir el comportamiento de la pandemia es importante que las autoridades sanitarias continúen asumiendo el reto para la detección, sistematización y manejo oportuno de los casos. El comportamiento de la pandemia ha sido similar en los departamentos del Caribe Colombiano, hay una homogeneidad al momento de acatar las normas del gobierno, y cada región adaptó diferentes estrategias dentro de un marco general para reducir la incidencia de la enfermedad. Se recomienda fortalecer la similitud entre los datos reportados por el Ministerio de Salud, SIVIGILA y los entes territoriales. El talento humano en salud cualificado puede soportar este ejercicio a fin de superar la actuación mediática y avanzar hacia la gobernanza.
Abstract Background: The social and health impact generated by the COVID-19 pandemic allows us to re-think aspects of epidemiological surveillance and communication in struggle-times. Objective: To describe the behavior of the COVID-19 pandemic in the departments and special districts of the Colombian Caribbean region. Methodology: This is a documentary and interpretive analysis from secondary sources of National Surveillance "SIVIGILA" and data from local governments. Results: Cartagena de Indias is the first territorial area in the Caribbean to present cases COVID-19, followed by Santa Marta and Barranquilla. The highest number of cases was registered in Barranquilla, Atlántico, Cartagena and Córdoba. Likewise, the highest death rate per 100,000 inhabitants was observed in Barranquilla, Atlántico, Córdoba, Santa Marta, Sucre and Cartagena. In the Caribbean, social distancing was implemented, as well as the limitation of mass gatherings and border closure. Discussion: To describe the pandemic behavior, it is important that health authorities continue to assume the challenges of detection, systematization, and timely handling of cases. The COVID-19 performance has been similar in the Colombian Caribbean. There is a homogeneity regarding the government regulations compliance and each region adapted different strategies to reduce the incidence of the dicease. It is recommended to strengthen the concordance between the data reported by the Ministry of Health, SIVIGILA, and the territorial entities. Qualified human talent can support this exercise in order to overcome the media performance through the strengthening of governance.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Public Health , Disease Notification , Epidemiological Monitoring , Health Governance , ColombiaABSTRACT
Background: Gestational diabetes (GD) impacts maternal and fetal morbidity. In 2012, the World Diabetes Foundation provided financing project in Barranquilla (Colombia), aimed to implement a clinical guide for the diagnosis and treatment of this condition. Aim: To estimate the adherence of the guide in primary care centers. Material and Methods: A Cross-sectional study of pregnant women suspected of having gestational diabetes. Pregnant women were classified according to the week of admission to the prenatal control program: < week 24 or later. Women with a fasting blood glucose over 92 mg/dL and under 126 mg/dL or with some positive result to the oral glucose tolerance test were included. Results: Nine percent (1,887 women) of 21,699 registries of pregnant women, were at risk for gestational diabetes. Of these, 1,880 registries with complete data were analyzed. Sixty nine entered the program at less than 24 weeks of pregnancy and 71% had had a fasting blood glucose measured in the first control. In 69.2% of these women, criteria for gestational diabetes was met. A glucose tolerance test was suggested to women with a blood glucose below 92 mg/dl. Among 72% of the latter, the glucose tolerance test met the criteria for gestational diabetes. Among the 498 women who entered the program after 24 weeks of gestation, 68% met the criteria for gestational diabetes with the fasting blood glucose levels. In 90 women, a glucose tolerance test was performed and 80% met the criteria for gestational diabetes. Conclusions: An adequate adherence to guidelines favors the detection of pregnant women with gestational diabetes.