Port exteriorization appendectomy: is it the future?

The time honoured surgical procedure open appendectomy seems to be on the decline, it may be replaced in the modern era by laparoscopic appendectomy ("in appendectomy") performed with three trocars, or by the port exteriorization appendectomy ("out appendectomy") which can be done with two ports or even one. These techniques combine the benefits of decreased tissue trauma and operative time in addition to other advantages of minimal invasion. We conducted this study to know the effectiveness of Port Exteriorization Appendectomy, to analyze its complications and to assess the conversion rate. A one year prospective study consisted of fifty cases; a combination of emergency and elective group. They were operated under general anaesthesia and different variables were documented. Mean operative time, conversion rate, hospital stay, complications and patient satisfaction. There were 27 females with the (F: M) ratio of 1.17:1. The operative time of 23.3 mins, conversion in 4 (8.0%) patients and 2.4 days of hospital stay contributed to 86.0% operative success rate. Surgical site infection was seen in 5 (10.0%) patients and one (2.0%) developed pelvic abscess. On analysis of the satisfaction level, 44(93.6%) were completely satisfied and one (2.1%) patient seemed disappointed with the technique for cosmesis though, 42 (89.3%) remained completely satisfied and 5(10.7%) didn't like their scars. Port exteriorization appendectomy's efficacy can be verified by 86.0% success rate, operative time of 23.3 mins, indoor stay of 2.4 days, and minimal undesirable sequlae. However, more authentic results could be obtained if this technique is compared to open or laparoscopic appendectomy in a well designed randomized controlled clinical trial.

Factors influencing mortality in perforated duodenal ulcer following emergency surgical repair.

Duodenal perforation is a common abdominal catastrophe with excellent outcome if prompt resuscitation and surgical repair of perforation are done. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with death after surgery in patients with duodenal perforation. One hundred and forty-five patients who underwent Graham's patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer between 14 April 2002 and 31 December 2004 were studied. The mean age was 45.99 years and 61 patients (42.07 %) were referrals. There were 124 (85.52 %) males and 21 (14.48 %) females. There were 10 deaths (6.9 %). The mean time delay was 2.46 days. It was 2.37 days in survivors, 3.7 days in non-survivors. The time delay was 3.25 days for females and 3.13 days for patients referred from another hospital. The mortality was significantly associated with time delay between perforation and operation (p<0.01), presence of co-morbid conditions (P<0.04), respiratory rate (p<0.02), raised blood urea (p<0.01) and serum creatinine (p<0.001), size of perforation (p<0.005), amount of peritoneal fluid (p=0.003) and requirement of postoperative intensive care unit support (p=0.003). Time delay between perforation and operation, preoperative blood urea and serum creatinine, size of perforation and amount of peritoneal fluid, presence of co-morbid conditions and need for post operative ICU support are the important predictors of outcome after emergency surgery for duodenal perforation.