Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Gut and Liver ; : 217-225, 2023.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-966886

ABSTRACT

Background/Aims@#Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors in the stomach. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of endoscopic treatment for gastric GISTs. @*Methods@#This is a single center, retrospective study that enrolled 135 cases of gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) resected by endoscopic procedures and confirmed as GISTs by histopathology from March 2005 to July 2019. The immediate and long-term clinical outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. @*Results@#The mean patient age was 57.9 years, and the mean tumor size was 2.1 cm. Of the tumors, 43.0% were located in the body, followed by the fundus (26.7%) and cardia (17.0%). Most tumors (85.2%) were resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection, followed by endoscopic mucosal resection (6.7%), submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (5.9%), and endoscopic full-thickness resection (2.2%). Macroperforation occurred in 4.4% and microperforation in 6.7% of the cases. The R0 resection rate was 15.6%. However, the rate of complete resection by the endoscopic view was 90.4%, of which 54.8% of cases were in the very-low-risk group, followed by the low-risk group (28.1%), intermediate-risk group (11.9%), and high-risk group (5.2%). During 36.5 months of follow-up, recurrence was found in four (3.4%) of the 118 patients who were monitored for more than 6 months (low-risk group, 1/37 [2.7%]; intermediate-risk group, 2/11 [18.2%]; high-risk group, 1/6 [16.7%]). @*Conclusions@#Endoscopic treatment of a GIST appears to be a feasible procedure in selected cases. However, additional surgery should be considered if the pathologic results correspond to intermediate- or high-risk groups.

2.
Clinical Endoscopy ; : 85-91, 2021.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-874467

ABSTRACT

Background/Aims@#Small bowel malignancies often present a diagnostic challenge due to their relative rarity and nonspecific clinical symptoms. However, technical developments in endoscopic instruments, including video capsule endoscopy (VCE) and enteroscopy, have allowed for the visualization of the entire small bowel. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological features of small bowel malignant tumors diagnosed by VCE and double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) in a single tertiary center. @*Methods@#We retrospectively analyzed VCE and DBE findings from Korea University Guro Hospital from January 2010 through September 2018. @*Results@#A total of 510 VCE and 126 DBE examinations were performed in 478 patients. Small bowel malignancies were diagnosed in 28 patients (15 males; mean age, 61.0 years; range, 42 to 81 years). Among them, 8 had lymphoma, 8 had primary adenocarcinoma, 7 had gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and 5 had metastatic cancer. Abdominal pain and obstructive symptoms were the most common findings in metastatic cancers (4/5, 80%). On the other hand, obscure gastrointestinal bleeding was the most common symptom of GIST (6/7, 85.7%) and adenocarcinoma (3/8, 37.5%). @*Conclusions@#Approximately 6% of the patients who underwent either VCE or DBE were diagnosed with small bowel malignancy. These findings demonstrated the different clinical characteristics among small bowel malignancies and merit further study.

3.
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology ; : 11-16, 2019.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-787176

ABSTRACT

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is one of the most prominent diseases in Western countries because of its potential to progress to dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. Recently, the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), American Gastroenterology Association (AGA), and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) developed clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of BE. All three guidelines commonly stressed the necessity of the endoscopic eradication of confirmed, nonnodular low grade dysplasia or high grade dysplasia, as well as the endoscopic elimination of the remaining BE after an endoscopic resection of visible mucosal abnormalities. An endoscopic resection is also considered for the optimal management of esophageal adenocarcinoma confined to the mucosa (T1a), and even in selective cases of submucosal invasion (T1b). As endoscopic therapy becomes the mainstay for the treatment of BE and its complications, the eligibility of pathologic or endoscopic experts and the BE expert center are being set and strengthened. This paper introduces the statements of the ACG, AGA and ESGE guidelines and compares the similarities and differences between them.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Diagnosis , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Esophageal Neoplasms , Gastroenterology , Mucous Membrane
4.
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology ; : 11-16, 2019.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-761528

ABSTRACT

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is one of the most prominent diseases in Western countries because of its potential to progress to dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. Recently, the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), American Gastroenterology Association (AGA), and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) developed clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of BE. All three guidelines commonly stressed the necessity of the endoscopic eradication of confirmed, nonnodular low grade dysplasia or high grade dysplasia, as well as the endoscopic elimination of the remaining BE after an endoscopic resection of visible mucosal abnormalities. An endoscopic resection is also considered for the optimal management of esophageal adenocarcinoma confined to the mucosa (T1a), and even in selective cases of submucosal invasion (T1b). As endoscopic therapy becomes the mainstay for the treatment of BE and its complications, the eligibility of pathologic or endoscopic experts and the BE expert center are being set and strengthened. This paper introduces the statements of the ACG, AGA and ESGE guidelines and compares the similarities and differences between them.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Diagnosis , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Esophageal Neoplasms , Gastroenterology , Mucous Membrane
5.
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research ; : 236-244, 2019.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-786624

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication is known to be effective for reducing the size of gastric hyperplastic polyps (HPPs). This study investigated the change in size of gastric HPPs after H. pylori eradication.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study that enrolled 25 H. pylori-positive patients diagnosed as having HPPs at Korea University Guro Hospital between July 2015 and July 2016. If the patient wanted to receive eradication therapy, medication was given. If the patients refused eradication, only clinical follow-up was performed. All patients were subsequently followed up with endoscopic examination to determine any change in polyp size.RESULTS: Eighteen of the 25 H. pylori-positive patients diagnosed as having HPPs were given an eradication regimen, and 17 were confirmed to have achieved successful eradication. Twelve (70.8%) of the 17 patients in the eradication group showed ≥50% reduction in size, while two (25.0%) of the eight patients in the non-eradication group showed 50% reduction. The polyp regression rate was significantly higher in the eradication group (P=0.03). A multivariate analysis revealed that H. pylori eradication (OR, 40.047; 95% CI, 1.112~1442.767; P=0.044) and female sex (OR, 12.947; 95% CI, 1.038~161.503; P=0.047) were significant predictive factors of HPP regression.CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication is an effective therapeutic modality for gastric HPP regression.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Follow-Up Studies , Helicobacter pylori , Helicobacter , Korea , Multivariate Analysis , Polyps , Prospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms
6.
Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases ; : 37-41, 2016.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-83856

ABSTRACT

Iron supplements such as ferrous sulfate tablets are usually used to treat iron-deficiency anemia in some elderly patients with primary neurologic disorders or decreased gag reflexes due to stroke, senile dementia, or parkinsonism. While the aspiration of ferrous sulfate is rarely reported, it is a potentially life-threatening condition that can lead to airway necrosis and bronchial stenosis. A detailed history and high suspicion of aspiration are required to avoid delays in diagnosis and treatment. The diagnosis can be confirmed by bronchoscopic examination and a tissue biopsy. Early removal of the aspirated tablet prevents acute complications, such as bronchial necrosis, hemoptysis, and lobar consolidation. Tablet removal is also necessary to prevent late bronchial stenosis. We presented the first case in Korea of a ferrous sulfate tablet aspiration that induced severe endobronchial inflammation.


Subject(s)
Aged , Humans , Alzheimer Disease , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency , Biopsy , Bronchi , Bronchoscopy , Constriction, Pathologic , Diagnosis , Foreign Bodies , Hemoptysis , Inflammation , Iron , Korea , Necrosis , Nervous System Diseases , Parkinsonian Disorders , Reflex , Respiratory Aspiration , Stroke , Tablets
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL