Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Bahrain Medical Bulletin. 2016; 38 (2): 97-100
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-178828

ABSTRACT

Background: Mini-implants have been successfully used when there is a little bone to support complete dentures, using of mini-implants abutment is the key solution for stable and retentive overdentures


Objective: To compare peri-implant bone height post angulated or non-angulated mini-implants insertion


Design: A Randomized Two-Arm Parallel Study


Setting: Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University-Assiut Branch, Egypt


Method: The study was performed from October 2012 to December 2014. Twenty patients were included in the study based on two criteria [1] free from any systemic diseases and [2] their lower flat ridges resorbed with ill-fitted lower dentures. The patients were divided into two groups. The first group received lower overdenture with non-angulated abutment while the second group received lower overdenture with angulated abutment. The bone height for each subject was evaluated with panoramic X-ray after 6,12,18 and 24 months. The data were analyzed using SPSS program


Result: Twenty edentulous patients participated in this study. They were homogenous in their personal characteristics. Their education levels varied between primary and secondary levels. Insignificant differences in age, education level and gender were found [p > 0.05]


The differences between the two groups were highly significant. Mean bone height was found to be significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 [p = 0.03]. The paired sample t-test showed a significant improvement in bone height in the non-angulated group [p = 0.03] and insignificant increase in the angulated group [p = 0.14]


Conclusion: Lower overdenture mini-implant with non-angulated abutment is better for edentulous patients compared to angulated abutment in term of bone height


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Dental Abutments , Denture, Overlay , Dental Implants , Jaw, Edentulous
2.
Medical Journal of Cairo University [The]. 2008; 76 (Supp. 2): 231-234
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-88935

ABSTRACT

To reduce the effect of hypothermia during general anaesthesia using either midazolam or nitroglycerin premedication. Hypothermia has many disadvantages during general anaesthesia e.g decrease in oxygen consumption, decreased drug metabolism, arrhythmia, post-operative shivering or even cardiac arrest. So, we used midazolam and nitroglycerin in a trial to reduce likehood of occurance of intraoperative hypothermia. 60 geriatric patients were scheduled for intraocular surgery were randomly assigned into three groups. Each group has 20 patients n=20; midazolam group received 0.04mg-kg - midazolam i.m. 30 minutes before induction; nitroglycerin group received 10 mg nitroglycerin patch one hour before induction. Control group had no premedication. Results showed that midazolam and nitroglycerin have a beneficial effect to reduce intraoperative hypothermia. Nitroglycerin increased fingertip blood flow more than midazolam. Midazolam had a satisfactory role in body heat redistribution more than nitroglycerin. Midazolam is a suitable drug for premedication to reduce intra-operative. Hypothermia through its effect on heat redistribution. It is superior to nitroglycerin


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Intraoperative Period , Aged , Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures , Preanesthetic Medication , Midazolam , Nitroglycerin , Treatment Outcome , Geriatrics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL