Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Tunisie Medicale [La]. 2013; 91 (12): 739-740
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-141210
2.
International Journal of Health Sciences. 2008; 2 (2): 147-153
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-101128

ABSTRACT

In this prospective study, we determined phenotypic resistance to erythromycin among gram positive bacteria. Bacterial isolates were identified by conventional methods and by the Micro Scan: D-test zone was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards institutes [CLSI] recommendations to determine inducible resistance to clindamycin on gram positive bacteria isolated from different clinical specimens. Bacterial isolates included: group A streptococci [GAS], group B streptococci [GBS], viridans streptococci, S pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus [S.aureus] [both methicillin susceptible [MSSA] and methicillin resistant [MRSA]. A total of 1072 gram positive bacterial isolates were tested. The majority was from swabs collected from outpatient clinics. Erythromycin resistance was 8/23 [35%] for S. pneumoniae, 12/91 [13%] for GAS and 17/300 [5.7%] for GBS. All GAS and viridans streptococci possessed the efflux phenotype only. 8[8.8%] and 1[20%], respectively. For GBS, cMLS[B] phenotype. Seventy five isolates [16.3%] of MSSA were resistant to erythromycin compared to 160[83%] of MRSA. The majority of MSSA, 31/460 [6.7%] had an efflux phenotype while 26/460 [5.6%] were of cMLS[B] and 19/460[4%] iMLS[B] phenotypes. Constitutive MLS[B] was the most predominant resistant phenotype, 152/193 [78.8%] among MRSA. D-test zone should be considered for routine testing to detect inducible clindamycin resistance among significant gram positive bacteria


Subject(s)
Clindamycin/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Prospective Studies , Culture Media/chemistry , Sensitivity and Specificity , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Erythromycin/pharmacology
3.
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2007; 23 (1): 39-42
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-84736

ABSTRACT

To present trends of resistance to ciprofloxacin among common organisms isolated at King Khalid University Hospital [KKUH] between 2001-2005. Ciprofloxacin susceptibility of all isolates of Gram negative and Gram positive organisms were retrospectively obtained during the period from 2001-2005 in KKUH. Data from intensive care unit [ICU] and non-ICU patients were separately analyzed. Escherichia coli [E.coli] resistance increased from 10% in 2001 to 22% in 2005. Enterobacter cloacae [Ent.cloacae] resistance decreased from 11-14% in 2003 -2004 to 7% as in 2001 and 2005. Klebsiella pneumoniae [K.pneumoniae] resistance fluctuated from 6% in 2002 and 2003, 13% in 2004 to 6% in 2005. Pseudomonas aeruginosa [P.aeruginosa] resistance ranged from 7% - 8% during this study period while that of Acinetobacter spp. ranged between 45% to 62% and Staphylococcus aureus [S.aureus] resistance doubled from 18% in 2001 to 39% in 2005. None of Streptococcus pneumoniae [S.pneumoniae] isolates showed resistance to ciprofloxacin. Isolates of E .coli, Acinetobacter spp. and S.aureus from non-ICU patients showed higher resistance to ciprofloxacin than isolates from ICU patients while K.pneumoniae and P.aeruginosa showed higher resistance from ICU patients than isolates from non-ICU patients. Ciprofloxacin resistance among many Gram negative species and S.aureus is an increasing threat among many Gram negative species and S.aureus in our hospital in both ICU and non-ICU patients


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Hospitals, Teaching , Intensive Care Units , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Escherichia coli , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Enterobacter cloacae , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Acinetobacter , Staphylococcus aureus , Streptococcus pneumoniae
4.
KMJ-Kuwait Medical Journal. 2006; 38 (3): 198-202
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-78839

ABSTRACT

To compare the accuracy of disk diffusion method and E-test for the detection of methicillin resistance and low-level methicillin-resistance in Staphylococcus aureus [S. aureus] and the PBP2a latex agglutination test for confirmation. A total of 76 methicillin resistant S. aureus [MRSA] isolates from different clinical specimens were tested by disk diffusion method. Disk d i ffusion method was performed using methicillin [MET] 5microg disk, oxacillin [OX] 1 microg disk, moxalactam [MOX], and cefoxitin [FOX] 30 microg each on Mueller Hinton agar [MHA] plates supplemented with 2% NaCl and incubated at 35 °C for 24 hours. Minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] was performed by E-test for MET and OX on MHA plates containing 2% NaCl. Results for all tests were read according to NCCLS recommendations for zone of inhibition and break points. Low-level MRSA strains were confirmed by PBP2a latex agglutination test. All strains were tested for ?-lactamase production. All MRSA strains were detected by disk diffusion methods using MET, OX and FOX [100%]. Four [5.2%] strains were low-level MRSA by MOX disk. E-test detected 72 [94.7%] using MET and 74 [97.3%] MRSA strains using OX. No heterogeneous growth within the zones of inhibitions was noticed. One MRSA was misclassified as methicillin sensitive by MET E-test [MIC 6 microg /ml], but was 32 microg/ml by OX E-test. Two strains were low-level MRSA by E-tests but showed resistance by MET, OX and FOX disk diffusion method. One strain had MIC of 12 microg/ml both by OX and MET E-tests. All four strains showed low-level resistance by MOX disk and were positive for PBP2a latex agglutination test. All the strains produced ?-lactamase. Conclusion: Disk diffusion method using MET, OX, and FOX can reliably be used to detect methicillin resistance in S. aureus. MOX and E-test can be used to detect lowlevel methicillin resistance and these can further be confirmed by PBP2a latex agglutination test in diagnostic laboratories


Subject(s)
Methicillin Resistance , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Cloxacillin/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Latex Fixation Tests , Prospective Studies
5.
EDJ-Egyptian Dental Journal. 2005; 51 (4[Part II]): 2353-2371
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-196672

ABSTRACT

This research was performed to evaluate some physico-mechanical properties of four different types of provisional restorative materials: water sorption, color stability, flexural strength and marginal fit. The tested materials included one type of heat-processed methyl methacrylate resin, one type of auto-polymerized methyl methacrylate resin and two types of auto-polymerized resin composite [hand-mixed and auto-mixed]. As regards the water sorption test, the corrected water sorption of the disc specimens of the four investigated materials [10 mm in diameter, 2 mm in thickness] was calculated up to six weeks immersion period in distilled water. Concerning the color stability test, the disc specimens of the four tested materials [10 mm in diameter, 2 mm in thickness] were immersed in distilled water for one month the color change [AE] was calculated after one week and one month. For flexural strength test, the bar specimens [25 x 5 x 2 mm] of the four tested materials were subjected to a three point loading using the Universal Testing Machine 24 hours after polymerization. As regards the marginal fit test, a die resembling a prepared molar was constructed and the marginal gap in millimeters was measured for the four tested materials using the Travelling Microscope. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that: [1] The method of activation of the tested provisional restorative materials, whether heat or chemical processing, plays the principal role in the improvement of the selected physico-mechanical properties. [2] The compositional pattern of the tested provisional restorative materials regarding the resin type and/or the incorporated filler type and loading affect dramatically their physico-mechanical behaviour. [3] The dispensing system [mixing technique] of the provisional restorative materials is a contributing factor in obtaining adequate physico-mechanical properties. [4] The water sorption process is usually associated with color change of the tested provisional restorative materials

6.
EMJ-Emirates Medical Journal. 1999; 17 (1): 9-11
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-50725

ABSTRACT

Metronidazole resistance is emerging as an important cause of treatment failure of Helicobacter pylori [H. pylori] associated diseases. H. pylori strains isolated from 55 Saudi dyspeptic patients were tested for susceptibility to metronidazole [MTZ], ampicillin, erythromycin, and tetracycline. Disc difusion method was used because it is practical, reproducible,clinically applicable,and it correlates well with MIC and is inexpensive.Overall MTZ resistance was found in 41 strains out of 55 isolates [74.6%]. Twenty five resistant strains were isolated from thirty-three female patients [76%]. Ampicillin, erythromycin, and tetracycline resistance were 31% [17/55], 14.5% [8/55] and 8% [5/55] respectively. In conclusion, because of the high rates of resistance it is recommended that susceptibility of H. pylori to commonly used antibiotics be tested routinely to determine the appropriate treatment for peptic ulcer disease


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Helicobacter pylori/drug effects , Hospitals, Teaching , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Anti-Infective Agents
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL