ABSTRACT
Methods@#We assessed 23 patients with a mean age of 57.3±15 years. According to the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scale; eight patients had grade 0, nine had grade I, and six had grade II. All patients underwent plain radiography and magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine. The foramen magnum was involved in 10 patients, C1–2 in seven, C2–3 in four, and C3–4 in two. All patients were operated via the far-lateral approach. @*Results@#Gross total resection was achieved in 21 patients. Sixteen lesions were psammomatous, five were fibroblastic, and two were meningothelial meningiomas. The mean operative duration was 135±40 minutes, while the mean operative blood loss was 450±210 mL, and the mean hospital stay was 4.3±2.2 days. At the final follow-up that was conducted at 27.6±21 months and as per the JOA score; 16 patients were classified into grade 0 and 7 into grade II. The condition of none of our patients deteriorated postoperatively. There was no significant correlation of the clinical outcome with tumor level, pathological subtype of the tumor, symptom duration, age, and sex. There was no significant correlation of tumor resection completeness with tumor level, tumor pathological subtype, or tumor topography (ventral or ventrolateral). @*Conclusions@#The far-lateral approach is a safe and effective access for ventral and ventrolateral cervical meningiomas. It allows direct access to tumor with no spinal cord or nerve roots traction, and thus may yield a fairly better outcome than the standard posterior approach.
ABSTRACT
Facet joint is a main source of chronic low back pain with a prevalence of 16.7%. Clinical examination and imaging are insufficient to diagnose facet joint syndrome [30% accuracy and 45% false positives]. Facet joint block is the gold standard in diagnosis of facet joint syndrome. It can also relieve pain for up to 6 months. It can be done under computed tomography [CT] or fluoroscopy. To identify which imaging modality is more suitable to guide the procedure of lumbar facet joint block, fluoroscopy or CT. Thirty four lumbar facet joints represented by 12 patients were injected in the radiology department, Suez Canal University Hospital, Ismailia, Egypt from 1/2005 to 1/2006. All cases were suspected of having facet joint syndrome based on clinical or radiological data. After clinical examination and reviewing lumbar images to identify target facets, every patient underwent facet joint block under either CT or fluoroscopy. Fluoroscopy was more successful in guiding the injections [success rate 77.7% compared with 31.25% in CT guidance]. It is also faster [6.6 minutes per joint compared with 10.9 minutes for CT guidance]. Less number of trials were required [1.7 trial compared with 6.6 trials with CT guidance]. Fluoroscopy exposed the patients and the radiologist to much irradiation [21.3 rad compared to 0.3 rad in CT guidance]. Decreased bone density and laminectomy impair fluoroscopy guidance. CT guidance is difficult in patients with marked arthropathy and coronally oriented joints [8 trials compared with 5.6 for normally appearing joints]. Fluoroscopy should be the primary choice for guiding lumbar facet joint block. It is more successful and faster. Its disadvantages include much irradiation to patients and radiologists, and difficulty in patients with laminectomy and decreased bone density. CT can then be used to guide the block
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Fluoroscopy , Bupivacaine , Methylprednisolone , Postoperative ComplicationsABSTRACT
This prospective, controlled, randomized clinical study critically compared the clinical and radiological outcomes in patients surgically treated by PLIF with carbon fiber cage versus those treated by PLIF with iliac bone graft. In the period between May 2004 and April 2006, sixty patients underwent posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine with transpedicular screw fixation for the treatment of their degenerative segmental instability. In half of then PLIF was done using carbon fiber cage and in the other half PLIF was done using iliac bone graft. Participants were evaluated pre-operatively and post-operatively at 3, 6, 9, and 12-month intervals. Pain was scored by a VAS for both lower limb and back pain both preoperatively and postoperatively. The clinical outcomes were compared using the Prolo economic and functional rating scale and the fusion status was compared using the radiological criteria of fusion proposed by Brantigan. By 12 months follow up period, 65% of the study group expressed clinical success. Prolo scale showed clinical outcomes of patients who were treated with PLIF with carbon cage are better than those treated with PLIF with iliac crest graft but this was not statistically significant. The radiographic evaluation for bone union showed that 43% of the iliac bone group had no fusion, but 80% of cases of the cage group revealed sound fusion. Complications were matched in the 2 groups except for collapse and iliac crest harvest complications that prevail in the iliac crest group. PLIF with Carbon cage gives better fusion on radiology than PLIF with iliac bone graft, but no statistical difference in the clinical outcome. Carbon cage use precludes complications associated with iliac bone harvesting