Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 146(4): 494-501, abr. 2018. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-961420

ABSTRACT

There is no consensus amongst physicians, social security representatives and researchers about optimum sick leaves. This is an indication that should maximize positive outcomes and minimize potential side effects, both for the patient and society. The use of sick leaves during the last decade rose steadily, particularly in the psychiatric field. The most important causes of this increase are: changes in public policies, overuse of psychiatric diagnosis to cover up unmet social needs, and modifications to labour structure. It is analysed the impact that this situation has implied for physician patient relationship as well as for health budget. Even though sick leave diminishes presentism associated to a psychiatric disorder, published evidence about the effect of prolonged sick leave shows that damage overruns potential benefits: augmented morbidity and mortality, workplace phobia, economic loss, among others.


Subject(s)
Humans , Sick Leave/economics , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Chile/epidemiology , Occupational Health/trends , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Presenteeism , Mental Disorders/mortality , Mental Disorders/epidemiology
2.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 144(12): 1591-1597, dic. 2016. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-845490

ABSTRACT

The Work Accidents and Occupational Diseases Act exists in Chile since 1968. It uses a single model for the understanding and management of both somatic diseases like silicosis and psychiatric disorders. During the last decade in Chile, the consultation rates due to psychiatric conditions of probable labor origin has rose over 1,000%, a factor that underscored the deficiencies of this model. The aim of this paper is to analyze the consequences of the application of this act in the psychiatric field for almost 50 years after its promulgation. This article contains an historical overview and an epistemological debate based on the authors’ experience dealing with clinical and administrative work both in occupational psychiatry departments and in regulatory entities. The development of occupational mental health in Chile is examined as part of an historical process that initially did not consider the relationship between work and mental suffering as relevant. The application of a single causality model in psychiatry, as well as the effects of building a psychiatric nosology upon legal rather than medical criteria is contested.


Subject(s)
Humans , Mental Disorders , Occupational Diseases/psychology , Occupational Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Chile
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL