Meningioma como causa poco común de hiposmia. A propósito de un caso

Resumen La afectación del sentido del olfato puede pasar desapercibida en gran parte de los pacientes, siendo únicamente valorada cuando la alteración es importante. Sin embargo, la hiposmia es un síntoma asociado a numerosas patologías, de menor a mayor gravedad. Este sentido está relacionado con nuestros recuerdos y puede alertarnos de potenciales amenazas. Como médicos especialistas en Otorrinolaringología debemos estar alerta ante determinados síntomas que orienten a posible etiología central. Presentamos el caso de una mujer de 39 años que acudió al Servicio de Otorrinolaringología del Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer derivada por hiposmia de un año de evolución con cervicalgia y cefalea occipital progresiva, sin otra sintomatología asociada. La exploración otorrinolaringológica resultó normal. Debido a la persistencia sintomática se solicitó una tomografía computarizada de senos paranasales con hallazgos de masa intracraneal extraaxial compatible con meningioma de fosa craneal anterior.

Abstract The affectation of smell can go unnoticed in a great part of the patients, being only valued when the alteration is important. However, this sense is related to our memories and can alert us to potential threats. As otolaryngologists we must be alert to certain symptoms that may lead to a possible central aetiology. We present the case of a 39-year-old woman who went to the otolaryngology service at Morales Meseguer General University Hospital due to one-year evolution of hyposmia with cervicalgia and progressive occipital headache, with no other symptoms associated. The otolaryngology examination was anodyne. In view of symptomatic persistence, a paranasal sinus computed tomography scan was requested with findings of extra-axial intracranial mass compatible with anterior cranial fossa meningioma.

Early and late results of open surgical and endovascular treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms, selected according to surgical risk / Resultados precoces e tardios dos tratamentos aberto e endovascular de aneurismas da aorta abdominal infrarrenal, selecionados de acordo com o risco cirúrgico

Abstract Background Open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) surgery are alternative treatments for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (IRAAA). Objectives To compare OSR and EVAR for the treatment of IRAAA. Methods 119 patients with IRAAA were electively operated by the same surgeon between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2015, following selection for OSR or EVAR according to surgical risk. Complications, reinterventions, failures, and early and late mortality were analyzed. Results 63 OSR and 56 EVAR patients were analyzed. They were similar in terms of age (70 years), gender (92% men), and average diameter of IRAAA (6.5 cm), but with different comorbidities, surgical risk, and anatomy. EVAR was better than OSR regarding time in the operating theatre (177.5 vs. 233.3 minutes), need for transfusion (25 vs. 73%), and length of stay in ICU (1.3 vs. 3.3 days) and hospital (8.1 vs. 11.1 days). OSR allowed more associated procedures to be conducted simultaneously (19.0 vs. 1.8%). There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to complications (25.4 vs. 25.1%), reinterventions (3.2 vs. 5.2%), or early mortality (1.6 vs. 0%). During follow-up, OSR was associated with fewer revisions (3.13 vs. 4.21), angio-CTs (0.22 vs. 3.23), complications (6.4 vs. 37.5%), reinterventions (3.2 vs. 23.2%), and failures (1.6 vs. 10.7%), and had better survival (78.2 vs. 63.2%). Conclusions Correct selection of patients achieves excellent results because it avoids OSR in patients at high risk and avoids EVAR in patients with high anatomical complexity, achieving similar results in the perioperative period, but better results for OSR over the course of follow-up.

Resumo Contexto A cirurgia aberta (CA) e o reparo endovascular de aneurisma (REVA) são tratamentos alternativos para o aneurisma da aorta abdominal infrarrenal (AAAIR). Objetivos Comparar CA e REVA no tratamento do AAAIR. Métodos Foram incluídos 119 pacientes com AAAIR, operados eletivamente pelo mesmo cirurgião entre 1 de janeiro de 2006 e 31 de dezembro de 2015, após seleção para CA ou REVA de acordo com o risco cirúrgico. Complicações, reintervenções, falhas e mortalidade precoce e tardia foram analisadas. Resultados Foram analisados 63 pacientes de CA e 56 de REVA, com semelhanças de idade (70 anos), sexo (92% homens) e diâmetro médio do AAAIR (6,5 cm), mas com diferentes comorbidades, riscos cirúrgicos e anatomias. O REVA foi melhor que a CA em relação ao tempo na sala de cirurgia (177,5 vs. 233,3 minutos), necessidade de transfusão (25 vs. 73%) e tempo de permanência na unidade de terapia intensiva (1,3 vs. 3,3 dias) e no hospital (8,1 vs. 11,1 dias). A CA permitiu que mais procedimentos associados fossem realizados simultaneamente (19,0 vs. 1,8%). Não houve diferenças significativas entre os grupos em relação a complicações (25,4 vs. 25,1%), reintervenções (3,2 vs. 5,2%) e mortalidade precoce (1,6 vs. 0%). Durante o acompanhamento, a CA apresentou menos revisões (3,13 vs. 4,21), angiotomografias (0,22 vs. 3,23), complicações (6,4 vs. 37,5%), reintervenções (3,2 vs. 23,2%) e falhas (1,6 vs. 10,7%), além de ter melhor sobrevida (78,2 vs. 63,2%). Conclusões A seleção correta dos pacientes proporciona excelentes resultados porque evita pacientes com alto risco para CA e com complexidade anatômica para REVA. Os resultados são semelhantes no período perioperatório, mas melhores para CA durante o acompanhamento.

Dual endovascular repair (coils and stent) of a true aneurysm of the gastroduodenal artery / Reparo endovascular duplo (molas e stent) de aneurisma verdadeiro da artéria gastroduodenal

Abstract We report a case of an asymptomatic gastroduodenal artery aneurysm diagnosed in a 39 year-old woman. An abdominal ultrasound study showed an aneurysmal dilatation of the gastroduodenal artery with 2 x 2 cm diameter. To confirm this finding, she then underwent a computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis that showed a saccular aneurysm of the gastroduodenal artery. A dual endovascular approach was used to exclude the aneurysm by stent-assisted coil embolization. Complete exclusion of the aneurysm sac was confirmed on final angiography. She was discharged from the hospital on postoperative day 1.

Resumo Relatamos um caso de aneurisma de artéria gastroduodenal assintomático diagnosticado em uma mulher de 39 anos. Uma ultrassonografia abdominal mostrou uma dilatação aneurismática associada à artéria gastroduodenal com 2 x 2 cm de diâmetro. Para confirmar esse achado, foi realizada uma tomografia computadorizada do abdome e da pelve, que revelou um aneurisma sacular da artéria gastroduodenal. Uma abordagem endovascular dupla foi utilizada para exclusão do aneurisma mediante embolização com molas assistida por stent. A exclusão completa do saco aneurismático foi confirmada na angiografia final. A paciente recebeu alta hospitalar no primeiro dia de pós-operatório.

National Registry of Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs in Mexico II (RENAPREC II) / Registro Nacional de Programas de Rehabilitación Cardiaca en México II (RENAPREC II)

Abstract: Objective: The aim of this paper is to compare the state of Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs (CRP) in 2009 with 2015. Focus is directed on health care, training of health-providers, research, and the barriers to their implementation. Methods: All authors of RENAPREC-2009, and other cardiac rehabilitation leaders in Mexico were requested to participate. These centres were distributed into two groups: RENAPREC-2009 centres that participated in 2015, and the new CRP units. Results: In 2009 there were 14 centres, two of which disappeared and another two did not respond. CRP-units increased by 71% (n = 24), and their geographic distribution shows a centripetal pattern. The coverage of CRP-units was 0.02 centres per 100,000 inhabitants. Only 4.4% of eligible patients were referred to CRP, with a rate of 10.4 patients/100,000 inhabitants in 2015. The ratio of Clinical Cardiologists to Cardiac Rehabilitation Specialists was 94:1, and the ratio of Intervention Specialists to cardiac rehabilitation experts was 16:1. Cardiac rehabilitation activities and costs varied widely. Patient dropout rate in phase II was 12%. Several barriers were identified: financial crisis (83%), lack of skilled personnel (67%), deficient equipment (46%), inadequate areas (42%), and a reduced number of operating centres (38%). Conclusions: CRPs in Mexico are still in the process of maturing. Mexican CRP-centres have several strengths, like the quality of the education of the professionals and the multidisciplinary programs. However, the lack of referral of patients and the heterogeneity of procedures are still their main weaknesses.

Resumen: Objetivo: El propósito de este trabajo es comparar el estado actual de los programas de rehabilitación cardiaca (PRC) en México con el RENAPREC-2009, dirigido a la asistencia, docencia, investigación y barreras. Métodos: Se convocó a participar a todos los autores de RENAPREC-2009 y a otros líderes en rehabilitación cardiaca de México. Los centros fueron distribuidos en 2 grupos: los que participaron en el 2015 y las nuevas unidades de PRC. Resultados: En 2009 había 14 centros operativos, de los cuales 2 cerraron y 2 no respondieron. En 2015 se registraron 24 centros en total, representando un aumento neto del 71%. La distribución geográfica fue centrípeta. La cobertura fue de 0.02 centros/100,000 habitantes y de solamente un 4.4% de los pacientes elegibles (10.4 pacientes/100,000 habitantes). La relación cardiólogo clínico-rehabilitador cardiaco es de 94:1 y la de intervencionista-rehabilitador cardiaco es de 16:1. Las actividades realizadas y los costos de los PRC varían de forma importante de centro a centro. En promedio, el 12% de los pacientes en fase ii abandonaron el programa. Las principales barreras para el desarrollo de PRC fueron: económicas (83%), falta de personal capacitado (67%), falta de equipo (46%), áreas inadecuadas (42%) y un insuficiente número de centros operativos (38%). Conclusiones: Los PRC en nuestro país continúan en crecimiento. Se observan fortalezas como el nivel de docencia y el enfoque multidisciplinario, así como deficiencias en la homogeneidad de las actividades y la falta de referencia de la población elegible.

Randomized single-blind trial of topical ketanserin for healing acceleration of diabetic foot ulcers

The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of topically applied ketanserin for healing acceleration of diabetic foot ulcers. From august 1993 to september 1994, 140 NIDDM patients entered a randomized single-blind trial of topical ketanserin (Sufrexal, Janssen Pharmaceuticals; n=69) vs. normal saline (labeled here as placebo; n=71). All patients were subjected to surgical debridement of necrotic tissue and lavage with normal saline. Wound were <100 cm² in area. Persons with NIDDM and foot ulcers Wagner 2 and 3 with a median of 8 (interquartile range 4 -26) weeks duration were included. Ulcer area was measured at 0, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. The groups were similar in age, sex, years of diabetes duration, obesity, ulcer Wagner type, number of previous amputations and surgical debridements during this hospital stay. Average percent reduction in ulcer area at 12 weeks was 87 percent for ketanserin vs. 63 percent for placebo (p<0.001). The regression equations for the leastsquares fit to the area (y) against time (x) data points were y = 43.46-3.181x(r=0.995) for ketanserin and y= 39.46-2.016x(r=-0.999) for placebo (p<0.01). The 95 percent confidence limits for slopes were -3.181 ñ 0.98 and -2.016ñ0.15. Thus, average daily reduction in ulcer area was 4.5 mm²/day for ketanserin vs. 2.88 mm²/day for placebo. In clnclusion, topical ketanserin significantly accelerated wound healing in diaetic neurothrophic foot ulcers when applied as part of a comprehensive healing program