Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2014 Apr ; 62 (4): 388-391
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-155585

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To conduct an in vitro experimental study comparing the effectiveness of conventional silicone oil and heavy silicone oil against endophthalmitis‑causing agents. Materials and Methods: The antimicrobial activity of conventional silicone oil (RS OIL 5000) and heavy silicone oil (heavySil 1500) was tested. The antimicrobial effects of both silicone oils were determined by the growing capability of the microorganism. Results: The number of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans decreased to zero levels at the second day of inoculation in heavy silicone oil. In conventional silicone oil, the microorganisms survived longer than in heavy silicone oil. Conclusion: Heavy silicone oil seems to be more effective than conventional silicone oil against endophthalmitis‑causing agents.

2.
Braz. j. microbiol ; 42(1): 243-247, Jan.-Mar. 2011. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-571395

ABSTRACT

The stool samples from 245 patients with diarrhea were tested for heat labile toxin (LT) and heat stable toxins (ST) by passive latex agglutination and enzyme immunoassay methods respectively. Twelve (4.9 percent) enterotoxigenic E. Coli ETEC strains were isolated. Five strains (2 percent) expressed ST, and 7 (2.8 percent) expressed LT.


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Child, Preschool , Child , Clinical Enzyme Tests , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diarrhea, Infantile , Escherichia coli Infections , Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli/enzymology , Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Bacterial Toxins/analysis , Bacterial Toxins/isolation & purification , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures , Immunoassay , Methods , Methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL