ABSTRACT
To compare the safety and complications of veress needle [VN] versus direct trocar insertion [DTI] techniques in laparoscopic procedures. Comparative study. The study was conducted at three different hospitals in Karachi from October 2005 to May 2011. A total of 1050 consecutive laparoscopic surgeries were done during the study period. Female to male ratio was 2.5:1. In 73% of the cases direct trocar placement was done while in 27% pneumoperitoneum was achieved with Veress needle. Variables noted included technique, complications, and duration of surgery. Data was analyzed statistically using SPSS version 16. Female to male ratio was 2.5:1.Complications were more in direct trocar insertion method. Overall total complications were 3.4%. One percent in group I [VN technique] and 4% in group II [DTI technique] had complications [p=0.017]. No visceral injuries were noted in either group, but pre-peritoneal insufflations found in 2 patients [0.25%] in group II. Late complications were more in group II. This include wound infection [1.5%], late wound bleeding [0.9%], port site hernia formation [0.9%] and chronic sinus formation [0.38%].All these were statistically insignificant except wound infection [p 0.036]. Veress needle method is as safe as direct trocar insertion method in expert hands