Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-65266

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with cirrhotic ascites have low serum albumin levels, and paracentesis of ascitic fluid could compromise them further. AIM: We compared the therapeutic efficacy of ascitic fluid filtration and concentrate infusion (AFI) versus total-volume paracentesis (TVP) with colloid infusion in control of tense or intractable cirrhotic ascites. METHODS: Ten patients underwent AFI; their ascitic fluid was filtered repeatedly through hollow-fiber hemodialyzer, and the concentrate reinfused intravenously. In ten patients TVP was done with simultaneous intravenous colloid infusion. Follow-up was done weekly and the study terminated if the patient needed diuretics or developed complications. RESULTS: Pre-study parameters were similar in the two groups. In the AFI and TVP groups, the duration of procedure was median 12 hours and 5.5 hours; fluid removed by paracentesis was 10.2 L and 8.0 L, respectively; and fluid infused intravenously was 0.5 L [with mean (SD) protein content 5.7 (1.3) g/dl] and 1.1 L, respectively. Glomerular filtration rates were lower than normal in the two groups but did not change significantly with the procedure; body weight remained significantly lower up to week 3 and week 2, respectively. The study was terminated at median week 3 (range 1-8) and week 2 (1-4), respectively. Fever was an accompaniment of AFI and one patient developed peritonitis. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing AFI remained diuretic-free longer; the procedure is cost-effective but needs to be further evaluated to minimize the side-effects.


Subject(s)
Ascites/etiology , Body Weight , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Paracentesis , Plasma Substitutes/administration & dosage , Polygeline/administration & dosage , Random Allocation , Statistics, Nonparametric , Ultrafiltration/methods
2.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-64865

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Suppression of gastric acid may lead to gastric colonization by aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, and consequent clinical manifestations. The risk is likely to be higher with poor environmental hygiene. AIMS: To study the effect of short-term acid suppression with omeprazole on gastric bacterial flora. METHODS: Twenty-five ambulatory patients with acid-peptic diseases underwent clinical assessment and gastric juice collection (for pH and culture) prior to start of therapy with 20 mg omeprazole daily, on days 7 and 14 of therapy, and 7 days after omission of therapy (day 21). RESULTS: Eighteen patients completed the study. The median gastric pH was 1.8, 7.5, 7.5 and 3.4 on days 0, 7, 14 and 21 respectively. Positive gastric cultures were obtained in 13 of 25, 17 of 21, 18 of 18 and 14 of 18 patients on respective study days, with median colony counts of 1.5 x 10(4), 7.5 x 10(5), 8.7 x 10(7) and 7.3 x 10(4) cfu/mL respectively. Three patients developed self-limiting diarrhea during therapy and two more immediately after discontinuing therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric colonization is common with short-term profound acid-suppression, and may cause diarrhea. Acid suppressive therapy should be used with caution especially in patients with poor environmental hygiene.


Subject(s)
Adult , Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteria/growth & development , Enterobacteriaceae/growth & development , Female , Gastric Acid/metabolism , Gastric Mucosa/drug effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Omeprazole/therapeutic use , Staphylococcus/growth & development , Stomach/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL