Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Iranian Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2013; 6 (1): 28-35
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-130223

ABSTRACT

Physical Examination [PE] and breast MRI are two of the current methods which have usually used in diagnosis of primary breast cancer. Their accuracy in detection of: either complete response or presence of residual tumor, however, has not yet been established in patients who have been received Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy [NAC]. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI in assessment of residual neoplastic tissue after NAC in patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer [LABC]. Twenty patients with LABC have undergone contrast-enhanced MRI before and after the NAC. Considering histology as the gold standard, the tumor sizes in MRI and PE have compared with the histology results. We have calculated for all below: the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value [PPV] and Negative Predictive Value [NPV] for each of MRI and physical examination, as well as Pearson's correlation coefficients between the results of MRI and PE, and their histology results. We have found an accuracy of 85% for MRI with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 50%, a PPV of 83.3%, and an NPV of 100%. In addition, the accuracy for PE was 70% with a sensitivity of 71.4%, a specificity of 66.6%, a PPV of 83.3%, and an NPV of 50%. In this study, the calculated Pearson's correlation coefficient for MRI and histology was 0.817 [p<0.0001] versus 0.26 [p=0.26] for correlation between PE and histology. MRI has higher sensitivity but less specificity than PE for detection of residual tumor after NAC in locally advanced breast carcinoma. Also, the tumor size that has measured by MRI had highly correlation with the histology


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/classification , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Treatment Outcome
2.
Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research [IJNMR]. 2012; 17 (7): 506-511
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-149265

ABSTRACT

Evidence based practice [EBP] is one of the main professional competencies for health care professionals and a priority for medicine and nursing curriculum as well. EBP leads to improve effective and efficient care and patient outcomes. Nurse educators have responsibility to teach the future nurses, and an opportunity to promote patient outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe nurse educators' knowledge and attitude on EBP. This was a descriptive study conducted in nursing faculties of two major universities of medical sciences affiliated to Ministry of Health and Medical Sciences in Tehran, Iran. Data were gathered using a three section questionnaire. Content and face validity was further enhanced by submitting it to nursing research and education experts. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS 11 software. According the results, nursing faculties' knowledge of EBP was mainly moderate [47.1%]. Significant statistical relationship was found between the level of knowledge with education and teaching experience in different nursing programs. Nurses generally held positive attitudes toward EBP [88.6%] and there was no statistical significant relationship with demographic variables. Nursing educators are in a position to influence nursing research in clinical practice in the future. Therefore, it is critical to achieve implementation of EBP and be a change agent for a paradigm shift toward EBP.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL