ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Abdominal tumors are one of the most common types of pediatric cancer. Therefore, they should always be included in the differential diagnosis of abdominal masses. Here, we present the case of a child whose initial hypothesis of diagnosis contemplated this possibility. Later, it was demonstrated that the abdominal mass found was secondary to a common parasitosis. A 2-year old, moderately malnourished and pale white boy was referred with a history of a rapidly growing, well-limited, middle abdominal mass. The mass was 10 by 3 cm, hard and poorly movable, apparently involving both abdominal rectus muscles. A complete resection was performed, revealing an abdominal wall abscess, with intense eosinophilic proliferation, secondary to a local and intense reaction to innumerous Ascaris lumbricoides eggs. Extra luminal infestations with Ascaris, that usually form peritoneal granulomas have been previously described. However, neither external trauma nor fistula, that could explain the superficial presence of the eggs, was found. This description reinforces the relevance of infectious diseases within the differential diagnosis of abdominal masses, particularly in areas with high prevalence of parasitic infestations.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Child, Preschool , Abdominal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Abdominal Wall/parasitology , Ascariasis/diagnosis , Diagnosis, DifferentialABSTRACT
Objective: To report the experience of a tertiary care hospital with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with primary immunodeficiencies. Methods: Seven pediatric patients with primary immunodeficiencies (severe combined immunodeficiency: n = 2; combined immunodeficiency: n = 1; chronic granulomatous disease: n = 1; hyper-IgM syndrome: n = 2; and IPEX syndrome: n = 1) who underwent eight hematopoietic stem cell transplants in a single center, from 2007 to 2010, were studied. Results: Two patients received transplants from HLA-identical siblings; the other six transplants were done with unrelated donors (bone marrow: n = 1; cord blood:n = 5). All patients had pre-existing infections before hematopoietic stem cell transplants. One patient received only anti-thymocyte globulin prior to transplant, three transplants were done with reduced intensity conditioning regimens and four transplants were done after myeloablative therapy. Two patients were not evaluated for engraftmentdue to early death. Three patients engrafted, two had primary graft failure and one received a second transplant with posterior engraftment. Two patients died of regimen related toxicity (hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome); one patient died of progressive respiratory failure due to Parainfluenza infection present prior to transplant. Four patients are alive and well from 60 days to 14 months after transplant. Conclusion: Patients' status prior to transplant is the most important risk factor on the outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplants in the treatment of these diseases. Early diagnosis and the possibility of a faster referral of these patients for treatment in reference centers may substantially improve their survival and quality of life.
Objetivo: Relatar a experiência de um hospital terciário no tratamento de pacientes pediátricos com imunodeficiências primárias com transplante de células-tronco hematopoéticas. Métodos: De 2007 a 2010, foram realizados oito transplantes em sete pacientes pediátricos com imunodeficiências primárias: imunodeficiência combinada grave (n = 2); imunodeficiência combinada (n = 1); doença granulomatosa crônica (n = 1); síndrome hiper-IgM (n = 2); síndrome IPEX (n=1). Resultados: Dois pacientes foram transplantados com medula óssea de irmãos HLA-idênticos; seis transplantes foram feitos com doadores não aparentados (medula óssea: n = 1; sangue de cordão umbilical: n = 5). Todos os pacientes haviam tido episódios de infecção grave previamente ao tratamento. Um paciente recebeu apenas globulina antitimocítica antes do transplante de células-tronco hematopoéticas, três transplantes foram feitos com quimioterapia de intensidade reduzida e quatro após quimioterapia mieloablativa. Dois pacientes morreram precocemente e não foram avaliados em relação à enxertia. Três pacientes tiveram enxertia completa, dois evoluíram com falha primária de pega, um deles recebeu um segundo transplante com pega do enxerto. Dois pacientes morreram de toxicidade do transplante (síndrome da obstrução sinusoidal hepática), um paciente morreu de insuficiência respiratória por infecção por parainfluenza já existente antes do transplante. Quatro pacientes estão vivos e bem entre 60 dias e 14 meses após o transplante. Conclusão: A condição do paciente ao transplante é o fator mais importante no sucesso do tratamento. O diagnóstico precoce dos pacientes e a possibilidade de encaminhá-los mais rapidamente para tratamento em centros de referência podem melhorar substancialmente a sobrevida e a qualidade de vida deles.