ABSTRACT
Objective: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare form of aggressive extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This study attempts to delineate the clinicopathological and radiological profile of PCNSL cases at our center. Materials and Methods: All the pathologically confirmed PCNSL cases between January 2007 and July 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The influence of potential prognostic parameters and therapeutic strategies on survival was investigated by log-rank test and Cox regression analysis. Results: Of the 53 PCNSL patients, 34 (64%) patients were males. Median age at diagnosis was 44 years (range 22–65 years). The most common location in the brain was the cerebral hemispheres in 32 patients (60%), and 16 patients (30%) had multiple intracranial lesions. Histologically, all patients were diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, except one case of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. The median survival of the patients received whole-brain radiation alone ( n = 6), standard CHOP chemotherapy + radiation ( n = 14), and DeAngelis protocol ( n = 31) was 8 months, 13 months, and 23 months, respectively. Among the 31 patients treated with DeAngelis protocol, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Class 1 ( n = 23) and Class 2 ( n = 8) patients had a median overall survival (OS) of 25 months and 13 months, respectively. The incidence of treatment-related neurotoxicity was significantly higher with DeAngelis protocol, in comparison to CHOP + whole-brain radiation therapy (26% vs. 14%, P < 0.05). Conclusion: None of the potential prognostic factors had a statistically significant influence on OS in our patients. High-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy combined with radiation was the only factor, which had a significant impact on survival (log-rank P = 0.000) but at the cost of increased neurotoxicity
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Synchronous occurrence of two malignant tumors is a rare event. With increasing use of sophisticated imaging modalities for staging, synchronous multiple tumors are more commonly detected now. Assuming the second primary malignancy as metastasis will change the intent of treatment from curative to palliative, greater awareness among oncologists is of paramount importance. This study is an example where thorough clinical examination and proper judgment resulted in correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective descriptive study. Patients diagnosed with synchronous primary tumors from January 2016 to November 2017 at our center were reviewed. RESULTS: Ten cases of synchronous primary malignancies were detected during this period. A total of 20 primary tumors were diagnosed. Lung carcinoma and gastrointestinal malignancies were the most common (five patients each). The median age was 59.5 years. Seven patients were male. Second primary tumor was suspected in four patients during clinical examination, while in six patients it was suspected on imaging. Even in the presence of two primary tumors, three patients were treated with curative intent. CONCLUSION: Possibility of synchronous second primary malignancy should always be kept whenever a distant deposit is detected at an unusual site. Histopathological evaluation of the lesion before assuming a metastasis will lead to accurate diagnosis, staging, and appropriate treatment.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Thymic epithelial tumors (TET) are the most common tumors of the anterior mediastinum. Patients with advanced/metastatic disease are usually treated with palliative chemotherapy (CT). Unfortunately, even though various palliative CT regimens have been used for long time, there is a real scarcity of published Indian data regarding the experience of palliative CT in metastatic TET (mTET). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of mTET patients treated between January 2010 and September 2017. Patients who received at least three cycles of first-line palliative CT were included for analysis of response rates, toxicity, and survival and prognostic factors. RESULTS: Of the 49 mTET patients, 27 (55.1%) were males. The median age at diagnosis was 52 years (range: 25–65). Eighteen patients (36.7%) had Masaoka Stage IVa disease, and the rest of the patients had IVb disease. The most common site of metastasis was pleuropericardium (n = 18), followed by lungs (n = 16) and lymph nodes (n = 9). The median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 11.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.7–13.6) and 20.2 months (95% CI, 17.1–22.8), respectively, for the whole cohort (n = 49). The median OS of patients with Stage IVa disease was significantly better than that of the patients with Stage IVb disease (log-rank P = 0.000). Moreover, the “responders” to first-line CT had a significantly better median OS than the “nonresponders” (log-rank P = 0.000). Various first-line palliative CT regimens were well tolerated in our patients. CONCLUSION: Adriamycin Cisplatin Vincristine Cyclophosphamide (ADOC), Cyclophosphamide Adriamycin Cisplatin, and paclitaxel + carboplatin all are viable first-line palliative CT options for mTET and showed a comparable survival in Indian patients. The present study suggested that “responders” to first-line CT and those with Stage IVa disease might have a better survival than “nonresponders” and those with Stage IVb disease, respectively
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In patients with small-volume disseminated disease of germ cell tumors, cure can be achieved with four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP). However, around 20% of these cases are not curable. Strategies to improve cure rates have shown that none of the currently available modalities were superior to the others. Among the most used ones, BEP and VIP (etoposide, cisplatin, and ifosfamide) have been the most studied. However, there are no reports comparing the two, except for a few in abstract forms from southern India. Therefore, we did a treatment outcome and cost-effectiveness analysis of two chemotherapeutic regimens (BEP vs VIP) that are used in poor-prognosis metastatic germ cell tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All male patients with germ cell tumors, diagnosed as having poor risk by IGCCCG, between January 2002 and December 2004 were included in the study. Clinical, laboratory, and other data were recorded. The patients were stratified into two categories on the basis of the type of chemotherapeutic regimen they received. RESULTS: In all, 46 patients were analyzed, with a median follow up of 26.6 months. The baseline characteristics (age, stage, PS, histology, and serum markers) were not different in the two treatment arms. There is no significant difference in the outcome with either of the chemotherapeutic modalities. VIP is less cost effective and more toxic compared to BEP. CONCLUSION: In view of the greater toxicity and cost of therapy, as well as lack of either overall or disease free survival advantage, VIP is not a preferred option for patients with high-risk germ cell tumors in the Indian setting and it is still advisable to treat patients with BEP.