ABSTRACT
Manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) has existed as an alternative to conventional phacoemulsification since its inception. The size of the incision has been becoming smaller in MSICS to reduce the surgically induced astigmatism. Smaller incisions go hand in hand with nucleus debulking and fragmenting techniques which have been practiced over almost four decades. Such techniques have a learning curve and require meticulous execution. The authors describe a technique to achieve nucleus bisection or trisection or debulking in a closed anterior chamber. This technique has been in use for a long time; it has shown excellent results and has a shorter learning curve. Since it is done in a closed chamber, the risk to the corneal endothelium is minimized as the anterior chamber remains deep throughout the procedure. Sudden escape of the viscoelastic and shallowing of the chamber are prevented, and the corneal endothelium is well protected. It uses iris as support and reference. The specially designed chopper is an inexpensive addition to the instruments. Fragmentation is achieved in the proximal half of the chamber where control over instruments is maximum. Pristine clear cornea on day 1 is the rule rather than the exception with this technique. This is a safe and repeatable technique for phacofragmentation in cataract extraction
ABSTRACT
A posterior polar cataract is a discoid posterior polar plaque-like cataract with a thin and fragile to absent posterior capsule with adherent acellular opacity to the capsule reported in the literature. It is a stationary or slowly progressive opacity. A higher risk of complications such as posterior capsular tear and nucleus drop makes this a challenging surgery. The techniques described in the literature include bimanual irrigation aspiration, leaving the plaque for later Yag, bimanual micro phaco, Lambda technique with dry aspiration, Phaco if opacity <4 mm and soft nucleus, pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), pars plana lensectomy (PPL) if opacity >4 mm and soft nucleus, intra-capsular cataract extraction (ICCE) and scleral fixated intraocular lens (IOL) if opacity >4 mm with the hard nucleus, viscodissection, 3 ports PPL, PPV, low parameters phaco, modified epinucleus removal, inverse horse-shoe technique, standard phacoemulsification, chip and flip for soft cataracts, stop and chop for hard cataracts, layer-by-layer phacoemulsification, standard lens aspiration, pars plicata posterior vitrecto-rhexis, manual small-incision cataract surgery, and conventional extracapsular extraction. A posterior capsule rupture rate of 0 to 36% is reported in different series for cataract extraction. To prevent this dreaded complication, surgeons used many modifications. Minimal hydrodissection in posterior polar cataract extraction was described by Fine et al. The authors describe a technique of low flow manual small-incision cataract surgery with minimal hydrodissection and nucleus rotation with no associated posterior capsule rent. This demonstrates that if the fluidics is understood and corrected, then minimal hydrodissection and nucleus rotation is not taboo in posterior polar cataract extraction by manual small-incision cataract surgery.
ABSTRACT
Continuous circular capsulorhexis (CCC) was demonstrated independently by Thomas Neuhann, Kimiya Shimizu, and Howard Gimbel in the 1980s and it finds mention in the landmark paper by Gimbel and Neuhann. The authors describe a technique of achieving the rhexis in a stable, viscoelastic-filled anterior chamber using the tunnel floor as the entry. This gets covered by the roof of the tunnel postoperatively and, therefore, does not leak. There is no oar-locking or striae even when cystitome goes beyond the edge of the tunnel. As there is no escape of the viscoelastic substance, there is no change in the pressure or shallowing of the anterior chamber. It is a useful technique for beginners. It is of great help in difficult cases like intumescent cataracts, shallow anterior chambers, hyperopes, nanophthalmos, pseudoexfoliation, small non-dilating pupils, intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (IFIS), and phacomorphic glaucoma.
ABSTRACT
Advanced instrumentation and intraocular lenses (IOL) allow great refractive and visual outcome control to permit excellent correction of refractive aberrations. Residual astigmatism can be modified to provide depth of focus using an appropriate incision in the steepest meridian in manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS). The authors describe the nomogram for surgically correcting astigmatism (SCA). This technique can handle preoperative astigmatism of about 2.25 DCyl with the standard incisions梥traight incision of 5, 6, and 7 mm in length, the minimally curved frown incision, the frown incision, the frown incision with an accentuated frown, and the U incision placed on the steep axis in the superior or the temporal quadrant depending on the axis of pre-operative astigmatism.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To study the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the ophthalmologists in India regarding cataract extraction practices. Methods: A prospective, online, descriptive study was conducted from January 2022 to April 2022 using a self?developed validated questionnaire attached which was administered through a generated link. Results: The mean age of these 153 respondents was 47.02 (SD = 11.53) years with a male preponderance (70.59%). The majority (52.9%) had completed a fellowship after their post?graduation, and 56.20% provided sub?specialty services. Comprehensive ophthalmology (69.93%) and anterior segment (50.32%) practice were the most popular. Although 76.47% of respondents used a mix of techniques, 11.11% surgeons used only phaco?emulsification and 9.8% used only manual small? incision cataract surgery (MSICS) as the lone cataract treatment modality. Roughly 38% felt that outcomes were comparable for phaco?emulsification and MSICS, whereas about 44% opined that the outcomes of phaco?emulsification were better. MSICS outcomes were reported to be better by approximately 15%. The frown incision (53.59%), the straight incision (19.60%), and the straight incision with back cuts (10.45%) were popular. The majority (71.24%) of the respondents were willing to train fellow ophthalmologists and youngsters in MSICS. Standalone practices and family practices (42.48%), private eye institutes (10.45%), medical colleges (12.41%), and government non?teaching hospitals (11.11%) were the major service providers. 4% were working in rural hinterland. Conclusion: The majority of the surgeons use a mix of cataract extraction operative techniques. A large, willing talent pool of manual small?incision cataract surgeons exists. India can be a global hub for MSICS delivery and training