Predictors of operative mortality following primary coronary artery bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although quality assessment of coronary artery patients can be done by 30 days risk-adjusted operative mortality, it is still insufficient to study the outcome after primary coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). In our study, we attempted to determine the factors, which can help predict operative mortality before and after CABG. METHODS: The study population consisted of 1000 prospective patients who underwent primary isolated CABG. Assessment was done by dividing the patients into two groups, i.e. non-survivors ( n= 12) and survivors ( n= 988). Data were analyzed using both univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, recent acute myocardial infarction, intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <25%, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), tracheostomy, re-exploration, ventricular arrhythmias, low cardiac output (CO), multiple blood transfusions, post-operative renal dysfunction and longer intensive care unit and hospital stay were found as risk factors for mortality. Multivariate analysis showed that LVEF <25%,VAP, ventricular arrhythmias and low CO independently predicted mortality. Prior knowledge of these risk factors can help not only in predicting the outcome and the risks but also helps to plan the surgical and post-operative course of the patients to improve the morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that operative mortality can be predicted prior to and after surgery considering factors such as LVEF, use of IABC, onset of ventricular arrhythmias and low CO.

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

BACKGROUND: To reduce surgical trauma and the drawbacks associated with sternotomy, we performed robotically controlled, video-assisted mitral valve surgery, using either the port-access or the transthoracic clamp technique. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between September 1997 and September 2000, 221 patients (78 males, 143 females) underwent mitral valve surgery through a small right minithoracotomy using the port-access endovascular cardiopulmonary bypass system. Mitral valve exposure was facilitated with an endoscope attached to a voice-controlled robotic arm (AESOP 3000) allowing stabilization and voice-activated camera positioning. Twenty-six patients underwent mitral valve repair and 195 had valve replacement. In 197 patients, mitral valve surgery was the primary operation, while 24 were redo cases. Skin-to-skin mean operating time was 3.5 +/- 1.2 hours and aortic cross-clamp time was 58 +/- 16 min, mean intensive care unit stay was 22 +/- 7 hours and hospital stay 6.4 +/- 1.2 days. There was no re-exploration for bleeding. There was no late death or re-operation on mean follow-up of 16.4 +/- 12.2 months. Patients showed improvement in their NYHA functional class from 2.6 +/- 0.5 to 1.4 +/- 0.8 postoperatively. Outcomes were compared with those of our previous 220 patients who underwent mitral valve surgery with the median sternotomy approach. CONCLUSIONS: The use of video and robotic assistance in port-access mitral valve surgery not only minimizes the length of the incision, but also gives full visualization of the entire mitral valve apparatus. This approach provides comparable results with the sternotomy approach, as well as marked advantages of reduced intensive care unit stay. ,ower blood transfusion requirement, better cosmesis and earlier hospital discharge.

Beating heart versus conventional reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting is increasing with an increase in the number of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. The clinical outcome of redo coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass are different. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared clinical parameters in patients who underwent off-pump (n=156) versus on-pump (n=194) redo coronary artery bypass grafting performed between January 1995 and December 2001 in our institute, to determine if off-pump surgery has improved the surgical outcome of redo coronary artery bypass grafting and emerged as an ideal technique. Patients who underwent on-pump redo surgery required more postoperative blood transfusion (86.53% on-pump v. 12.82% off-pump. p=0.001), prolonged ventilatory support (>24 hours) (16.49% on-pump v. 7.7% off-pump, p=0.021) and higher inotropic support (23.71% on-pump v. 10.89% off-pump, p=0.003). On-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting was also associated with a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (40+/-6.2 hours on-pump v. 20+/-4.1 hours off-pump, p=0.001) and longer hospital stay (9+/-4.2 days on-pump v. 5+/-3.4 days off-pump, p=0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher in on-pump patients than in off-pump ones (7.7% v. 3.2%); however, this was not statistically significant (p=0.114). CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting is a safe method of myocardial revascularization with lower operative morbidity and mortality, less requirement of blood products and early hospital discharge, compared with conventional on-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting.