ABSTRACT
Background: Gestational age supports predicting a potential due date, informing obstetrical care and testing, and assessing the baby’s health at birth. It is vital to obtain a gestational age in all pregnancies to offer regular care and medical management for both mother and fetus. The ultimate suitable techniques for calculating gestational age are ultrasonography. The study aims to investigate the perinatal outcome according to gestational age. Material & Methods: A Prospective cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Hospital, from January 2008 to June 2008. A total of 50 patients were enrolled in this study following the inclusive criteria. Data were collected using the predesigned semi-structured questionnaire. Verbal consent was taken before recruiting the study population. Completed data forms were reviewed, edited, and processed for computer data entry. Results: Among the study population (N=50), one-fifth of the mothers’ (10,20.0%) age was under twenty. The majority of mothers were (34,68.0%) between 20-30 years old with a mean age of 25.4 ± 4.32 years. Twenty-three patients (23,46.0%) came at 40+ weeks of pregnancy, eighteen patients came at (18,36,0%) on 41 weeks of pregnancy and nine patients (9,18.0%) came at41+ weeks of pregnancy. There was no perineal tear and two patients (2,4.0%) had cervical tears which were repaired. In two patients (2,4.0%) there was postpartum haemorrhage, among them two patients (2,4.0%) needed a blood transfusion. Among the healthy babies, the majority of the babies (20,40.0%) were born at 40 completed weeks of gestation, eighteen babies (18,36.0%) at 41 completed weeks and two babies (2,4.0%) were born at 42 completed weeks of gestation. Conclusion: Many childhood and adult diseases are linked with size at birth and are mostly inclined by early postnatal growth is widely accepted. The evolving fetus formulates itself for post-partum life by reporting to metabolic signals in its uterine environment.
ABSTRACT
Aim: There is lack of information on the severity of diarrheal disease with etiology. Thus the study aimed to compare the etiology of under-five children with moderate-to-severe disease (MSD) and mild disease (MD). Study Design: Diarrheal disease surveillance. Place and Duration of Study: Mirzapur Kumudini Hospital, Tangail, rural Bangladesh, January 2010 – December 2011. Methodology: Overall, 2,324 under-5 diarrhea children were enrolled in the hospital who came from the demographic surveillance system (DSS) catchment area. Whole stool samples were collected from each enrolled child to detect rotavirus, Shigella, ETEC and V. cholerae. Information on socio-demographic and clinical characteristics was also collected. Results: Among all the study children, 1,098 (47%) were aged 0-11 months; 789 (34%) were 12-23 months, and 437 (19%) were 24-59 months. Rotavirus (33%) was mainly responsible for diarrhea amongst children under-5 and 90% of them were less than 2 years. Shigella represented 14%; of which, 45% were 24-59 months old. However, ETEC and V. cholerae represented only 3% and 2% respectively. Shigella was the most commonly detected pathogen (27%) for MSD followed by rotavirus (16%). Conversely, rotavirus (43%) was responsible for MD. MSD were most likely to be infected with Shigella flexneri [OR-9.81; 95% CI (6.38, 15.18)] and Shigella sonnei [6.29; (3.67, 10.87)] compared to their counterparts with MD. In logistic regression analysis, Shigella was responsible for a 2.25 times higher risk for MSD. Children with Shigella were 3.28 times at higher risk for bloody stool and 2.45 times more likely to have fever. However, rotavirus diarrhea was more likely to be presented with vomiting (OR-2.46) and fever (OR-1.28), and Vibrio cholerae, most often with watery diarrhea (OR-4.35). None of the clinical features were significantly associated with ETEC. Conclusion: Shigella was the leading pathogen that was detected most often in MSD, whereas rotavirus was often associated with MD.