ABSTRACT
Objective To study the clinical value and the safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography(ERCP)for chronic pancreatitis in the pediatric population.Methods Clinical data,endo-scopic reports,and radiography of chronic pancreatic patients aged from 2 to 17 years old who underwent ERCP between Jan.1,2008 and Apr.30,2014 at Endoscopy Center of Ruijin Hospital were reviewed.These patients were divided into 3 groups,patients aged from 2 to 6 years old as children group(n =27),patients aged from 7 to 12 years old as juvenile group(n =35)and patients aged from 13 to 17 as adolescent group(n =25). Their clinical data and complications were analyzed by groups.Results A total of 170 ERCP procedures were performed in 87 patients,with the success rate of 99.4%(169 /170).All patients were diagnosed as having chronic pancreatitis by ERCP.Success rates of children group,juvenile group and adolescent group were 97.6%(40 /41),100.0%(72 /72)and 100.0%(57 /57)respectively.There was no statistically significance among the three groups(P =0.207).No serious complications like bleeding or perforation occurred.No proce-dure-related mortality occurred in this study either.The rate of post-ERCP adverse events in children group, juvenile group and adolescent group were 41.5%(17 /41),25.0%(18 /72)and 24.6%(14/57),respective-ly.Children group had more adverse events than the juvenile group(P =0.039)and adolescent group(P =0.045).Conclusion Pediatric ERCP is highly effective in the pediatric population with chronic pancreatitis. The incidence of post ERCP adverse events is higher among the youngest children.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical choosing principles of sedated colonoscopy with con-ventional colonoscopy. Methods Outpatients who were willing to accept colonoscopy with or without seda-tion were prospectively recruited,which were assigned to sedated colonoscopy group(n=362)and conven-tional colonoscopy group(n=323). All patients and endoscopists were asked to answer a self-administered questionnaire. The colonoscopy completion,operation time,procedure-related discomfort,and questionnaire results of the two groups were compared and statistically analyzed. Results The completion rate was 98. 9%in the sedated colonoscopy group(358/362)and 89. 8% in the conventional colonoscopy group(290/323) ( P=0. 337 ). The operation time of sedated and conventional group were( 5. 60 ± 3. 25 ) minutes and (7. 71 ± 5. 70)minutes respectively(P<0. 001). And the average cost was CNY 886. 54 per patient in se-dated group and CNY 386. 00 per patient in the conventional group. Patient satisfaction score of conventional group and sedated group were 4(3-4)and 3(2-3)points(P<0. 001),while endoscopist satisfaction score was 4(3-4)and 4(4-4)(P<0. 001). A total of 354 patients(97. 79%)in the sedated group and 225 pa-tients(69. 66%)in the conventional group showed willingness to repeat the identical colonoscopy( P <0. 001). Patients who were male(P=0. 035),having no past abdominal operations(P<0. 001),or no ab-dominal pain during colonoscopy( P =0. 015 )in the conventional group preferred to repeat conventional colonoscopy. Conclusion Although the examination time of conventional colonoscopy is longer than sedated colonoscopy,it could reduce anesthesia risk and the cost. Conventional colonoscopy remains an irreplaceable examination of colorectal diseases in developing countries. Physicians should not only focus on patients'com-fort during endoscopy,but also help patients make a decision based on their actual situation and endoscopic indications to make the best of medical resources.