Bond strength of bulk fill composite to teeth prepared with Er: YAG laser

Aim: The present in vitro study aimed to evaluate the bond strength of a bulk fill composite on dentin surfaces prepared with the Er: YAG laser. Methods: Twenty-four permanent third molars were selected and divided into 2 groups: CP - Conventional preparation with high-speed handpiece (control) and LA (laser) - Preparation with Er: YAG laser. The occlusal surface was removed to expose coronal dentin, which was subsequently prepared with a high-speed handpiece or Er: YAG laser (350mJ, 4Hz, 1.5 ml/min water flow). Both groups were restored with Filtek One Bulk Fill (3M ESPE) composite resin. After 24 hours, the samples were evaluated for microtensile bond strength (µTBS), fracture pattern, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: The data obtained in the µTBS test were submitted to t-test (α=0.05). The results showed no difference in µTBS when the different types of cavity preparation were compared (ρ=0.091). Fracture patterns revealed the prevalence of cohesive fracture in composite resin in CP (83.3%) and adhesive fracture in LA (92.1%). In the SEM analysis, the LA group demonstrated the presence of gaps between the composite resin and the irradiated dentin surface. The hybrid layer exhibited more regularity with the presence of longer and uniform resin tags in the CP group. Conclusion: The type of cavity preparation did not influence the values of bulk fill composite resin µTBS to dentin. Fracture patterns and scanning electron microscopy analyses suggested less interference at the adhesive interface in preparations performed using CP

Substituição de restauração classe IV em resina composta: relato de caso clínico / Class IV restoration replacement in composite resin: clinical case report

Introdução: a estética é um fator decisivo para a substituição de restaurações anteriores que apresentam falhas, causadas principalmente por alterações na coloração ou fraturas. Objetivo: o presente relato de caso descreve a substituição de uma restauração classe IV insatisfatória, apresentando o protocolo clínico utilizado desde o planejamento até a reabilitação definitiva, com o propósito de difundir o conhecimento sobre a técnica adotada e auxiliar outros profissionais no seu cotidiano clínico. Relato do caso: paciente JPJ, 28 anos, sexo masculino, apresentou-se ao consultório odontológico queixando-se do aspecto estético de uma restauração em resina composta no seu dente anterior. Durante o exame físico intrabucal foi identificada a presença de uma restauração classe IV insatisfatória no elemento 21, apresentando degradação e manchamento superficial. Para uma análise estética completa e planejamento do caso, foram realizadas fotografias intrabucais e moldagem com alginato para confecção de modelos de gesso. Resultados: como tratamento, foi realizado profilaxia, isolamento absoluto e substituição da restauração do dente 21 pela técnica direta com o auxílio de uma guia de silicone. Foi utilizado um sistema adesivo convencional de 2 passos (Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) e resinas compostas nanohíbridas (Empress Direct, Ivoclar-Vivadent, Barueri, SP, BRA), uma para reprodução do esmalte e outra para dentina. Por fim, foram realizados acabamento e polimento das restaurações. Conclusão: restaurações diretas com resinas compostas, quando bem indicadas e executadas, permitem a devolução da função de forma satisfatória e resultados altamente estéticos.

Introduction: aesthetics are a decisive factor in replacing anterior restorations that present failures, mainly caused by color changes or fractures. Objective: this case report describes the replacement of a class IV restoration with composite resin by the direct technique, presenting the clinical protocol used, from planning to definitive rehabilitation, with the purpose of spreading knowledge of the technique and helping other professionals in their daily clinical routine. Case report: patient JPJ, 28 years old, male, presented to the dental office complaining about the aesthetic aspect of a composite resin restoration on his anterior tooth. During the intraoral physical examination, the presence of a class IV restoration in element 21 was identified, which was unsatisfactory due to degradation and surface staining. For a complete and detailed esthetic analysis, intraoral photographs and molding with alginate were taken to make plaster models. Results: as a treatment, prophylaxis, absolute isolation and replacement of the restoration of tooth 21 were performed by the direct technique with the aid of a silicone guide. A conventional 2-step adhesive system (Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) and nanohybrid composite resins (Empress Direct, Ivoclar-Vivadent, Barueri, SP, BRA) were used, one for enamel reproduction and another for dentine. Finally, finishing and polishing of the restorations were carried out. Conclusion: direct restorations with composite resins, when properly indicated and executed, allow the return of function in a satisfactory way and highly esthetic results.