Rehabilitation of a mandibular segmental defect with magnet retained maxillofacial prosthesis.

Resection or loss of a portion of the mandible can result in a variety of functional, cosmetic and psychological deficits that are dependent on the extent of the defect, the concomitant therapy and the timing of rehabilitative efforts. These impairments greatly affect the patient's Quality of life (QOL). The thrust in cancer care is not simply on survival but on rehabilitation, which aims to improve multiple impairments and QOL. This article describes a case of a 58-year-old female with segmental resection of the anterior mandible, extending to lower lip, resulting in a large intraoral as well extra oral defect. Prosthodontics rehabilitation was done using a two-piece intra oral and extra oral prosthesis oriented to each other using magnets. Use of magnets for retaining the extra oral prosthesis simplifies the clinical and laboratory phase enhancing patient's comfort and psychological morale.

Scope of prosthodontic services for patients with head and neck cancer.

Patients with head and neck cancer face high morbidity due to the disease and its treatment and are affected on a variety of personal and physical levels. Maxillofacial prosthetics offer support for other disciplines in a multidisciplinary setting; can help to prevent / minimize the sequelae from disease and treatment, and offers the patient help in the rehabilitation process. Maxillofacial prosthodontics focuses on optimizing the disrupted rudimentary function of individuals whose rehabilitation will be a lifelong proposition. Normal function may not be achieved but optimal function should always be achieved and the patients can lead a near to normal life.

Brucella spondylitis and sacroiliitis in the general population in Mumbai.

OBJECTIVE: 1) To identify patients of brucella spondylitis and sacroiliitis amongst patients of 'infective spondylitis' and 'sacroiliitis', 2) To study clinical and radiographic features and outcome of brucella spondylitis. METHODS: We reviewed 21 patients of infective spondylitis and 12 of sacroiliitis attending our hospital between March and September 2000 and followed them to identify patients of brucella spondylitis and brucella sacroiliitis, using serological tests. RESULTS: 1) Twenty six patients (17 spondylitis and nine sacroiliitis) were detected to have brucella infection to be the cause of their illness. 2) Brucella spondylitis is commonly mistaken for tuberculous spondylitis in our country. Thus leading to a delay in the diagnosis as well as occurrence of angular deformity and neurological deficit, which are reportedly uncommon in this condition. 3) Consumption (or handling) of unpasteurized milk (tabela milk) and occasional animal contact were found to be the source of infection in the general population. 4) Predominantly lumbar spine involvement, end-plate erosion of L4, L3, L5, decreased intervertebral disc space, repair with'formation of an osteophyte, simultaneous involvement of several sites and association of spondylitis with sacroiliitis were important radiographic features. CONCLUSIONS: Brucellosis exists in the general population, high clinical suspicion especially when there is history of animal contact or consumption of unpasteurized milk, familiarity with clinical and radiological features of brucella spondylitis and detection of antibodies to brucella by ELISA will help us detect and treat these patients in time.