ABSTRACT
Objectives Narrowed right ventricular (RV) outflow conduits and pulmonary arteries (PA) increase RV pressures and warrant interventions. Stent angioplasty is an alternative to more morbid redo-surgery in developing countries. We evaluate the efficacy and safety of stenting and assess need for redo-surgical reinterventions on midterm follow-up after stent angioplasty. Methods Patients who underwent conduit, main PA and bilateral branch PA stenting for elevated RV pressures were analyzed retrospectively. Success was defined as 20% reduction in RV pressures or RV-aortic pressure ratio; 50% reduction in gradients or 50% increase of luminal diameter. Procedural results, complications and need for redo surgeries on follow-up were assessed. Results Among 60 patients aged 1–46 years, 57 were post-operative patients, who needed stenting at a median period of 48 months after surgery. Stenting succeeded in 98% and reduced RV pressures from 105.42 ± 28.39 mmHg to 54.46 ± 16.89 mmHg. Direct major procedural complications in five (8%) patients included procedural failure in one, stent migration in three and lung hemorrhage in one. None of the stented conduits needed a surgical change on a follow-up ranging 3–120 months. Following bilateral PA stenting in twenty-four patients, only two needed a repeat open-heart surgery during follow-up ranging 3–108 months. Catheter reinterventions on follow-up included elective percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation in nine patients and stent redilation in seven patients. Conclusions Stent angioplasty was safe and effective. Surgery was postponed in all stenosed conduits. Elective redilation of stents after bilateral PA stenting may be needed for somatic growth; but open-heart repeat surgeries can be avoided in a majority.