Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Gastroenterology and Hepatology from Bed to Bench. 2013; 6 (1): 32-35
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-127572

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the results and efficacy of serum CA[19-9] in determining the nature of a pancreatic solid mass in patients referred for investigation of possible malignancy. A wide variety of tumor markers have been proposed for pancreatic cancer but currently the only one with any practical usefulness for diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of treatment is "CA[19-9]". This present study is a single center 2 year descriptive, prospective and case series studying patients with a pancreatic solid mass. Serum CA[19-9] was checked in 159 patients .The majority of patients were male [68%] and 81% had mass in the head of pancreas. Pathologic assessment revealed 131 adenocarcinomas [82%], 10 other malignancies [6%], 7 benign lesion [4%] and was non-diagnostic in 11 cases [7%]. Mean level of this tumor marker in patients with adenocarcinoma, non-adenocarcinoma malignancy, benign and non-diagnostic pathology was 1094, 1004, 120, 259 U/ML respectively. With regarding 58 U/ML as a cutoff point; sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of this tumor marker for diagnosing the adenocarcinoma were 85%, 67%, 88%, 60% and 81% respectively. There was no significant relationship between Serum CA[19-9] value and histopathology of solid pancreatic mass. This marker has limited sensitivity and specificity and cannot be used as a definite diagnostic test. So the use of CA[19-9] for the differentiation of pancreatic cancer should be applied on an individual case basis, depending on the clinical situation and imaging findings


Subject(s)
Humans , Pancreas/pathology , Pancreatic Diseases , Prospective Studies , Adenocarcinoma , Pancreatic Neoplasms
2.
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology [The]. 2012; 18 (6): 358-363
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-151582

ABSTRACT

Endosonography is a distinct method for evaluating the structural lesions of the gastrointestinal [GI] tract, particularly the pancreatobilliary region. This procedure has made a fundamental change in the diagnosis of pancreatic mass lesion through providing fine needle aspiration. This study aims at evaluating the results and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration [EUS-FNA] in patients with pancreatic solid mass. The present study is an observational, prospective case series nature, evaluated patients with pancreatic solid mass referred to Imam Khomeini educational hospital in Tehran for a duration of one year since November 2010. In order to determine the false negative cases, the patients were followed-up from 6 to 12 months. EUS-FNA was conducted on all 53 patients without any complication. The majority of patients included in the study were males [68%] and 81% of patients had a mass in the head of pancreas. The result of cytopathology revealed 36 adenocarcinomas [68%], 7 other malignancies [13%], benign lesions [6%] and 7 non-diagnostic cases [13%]. The frequency of non-diagnostic results was significantly high in masses smaller than 3 cm [6 vs. 1, P < 0.002]. Patients with non-diagnostic result were younger than those with malignant cytopathology [52 +/- 7.5 vs. 66 +/- 7.5 years, P < 0.001].. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of this procedure concerning Adenocarcinoma were 88%, 100%, 100%, 70% and 90%, respectively. EUS - FNA is an effective and safe procedure in histopathologic diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. This procedure is useful in all pancreatic mass cases including resectable and non-resectable ones

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL