Stage Oriented Analysis of Soft Tissue Sarcomas / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: Soft tissue sarcomas have a wide variety of manifestation and its course is still unpredictable in many cases. This study altlempts to analyze the meaningful prognostic factors and to find optimal treatment strategies for each clinical stage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 1985 to Mar. 1997, 432 soft tissue sarcomas were enlisted and 319 cases were eligible for this retrospective study. Staging followed AJCC classification and there were 34 stage I, 69 stage II, 151 stage III and 64 cases of stage IV. For stage I and II, operation was a major tool. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy were added for each situation. Intensive chemotherapy and surgery were done for stage III and IV. Metastasectomy was added in feasible cases. RESULTS: Actual survival rate for the 319 cases was 50% at 152 months. Disease free survival for stage I, II, III was 84%, 41%, and 38%, respectively. The stage itself had a statistical significance (P<0.00001). In univariate analysis, surgical margin in stage II and local recurrence in stage III had statistical significance. Multivariate study revealed the local recurrence as the only meaningful factor in stage I, II, III. An aggressive treatment for stage IV and I, II, III with late metastasis group had significant gain on survival. CONCLUSIONS: The stage itself predicts the course of soft tissue sarcomas. Evaluation of sound surgical margin to prevent the local recurrence is necessary.

Osteosarcoma, survivorship following stage and chemotherapeutic regimen: 13 year experience of Korea Cancer Center Hospital / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: Although survival of osteosarcoma patient has markedly improved, cases of non-responders to chemotherapy and late-relapsers are still perplexing. Our strategy was to analyze the impact of chemotherapy and surgery on the survival for each stage, and to evaluate long-term survival and find prognostic factors within the same stage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 1985 to Feb. 1999, 461 osteosarcomas were enlisted at our department and among them 348 cases were evaluable. There were 1 IB, 4 IIA, 302 IIB, and 41 IIIB. Two hundred and fifty-five (IIA/IIB:4/251) out of 348 cases followed our protocol of chemotherapy and surgery. Two hundred and ten cases had neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 45 had adjuvant only. RESULTS: Eleven year event free survival of the neoadjuvant group was 56.7%. On univariate analysis for 210 neoadjuvant cases, age (90%), local recurrence, pathologic fracture, location and size were statistically significant. But multivariate one revealed age, type of surgery, local recurrence and pathologic response as useful factors. There were 12 local recurrences (5.7%) and 100 metastasis among 255 stage II and their average onset from treatment was 17.8 month. Survival after metastasis was 5.6% at 55 months and the aggressively treated group made gains in survival (P<0.0001). Survival of 41 stage III was 0% at 64 months and this group also had an advantage in survival through intensive chemotherapy and surgery for primary and metastatic lesions (p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Long-term survival of the treated 255 stage II group was 55% at 14 years. For stage II: age, local recurrence and pathologic response were meaningful prognostic factors. Aggressive surgery and chemotherapy were necessary to improve the survival of stage III and stage II with late metastasis group.