ABSTRACT
Manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) is a cost-effective alternative to phacoemulsification and extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) for cataract surgery. The surgical technique in MSICS is heterogeneous, and the maximum variation exists in incision and nucleus delivery techniques. Many studies on various incisions are available, and most of them are dedicated to surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), utility, and visual outcomes. The nucleus delivery techniques have less-extensive literature available. They can be divided into 損ulling� techniques like phacosandwich technique, fish hook technique, and vectis delivery and 損ushing� techniques like viscoexpression or hydroexpression with irrigating vectis/Blumenthal抯 MiniNuc technique. Postoperative surgical-induced astigmatism is comparable in all techniques. The authors describe a pushing technique which does not raise the pressure of the anterior chamber and can be utilized with variable-sized and irregularly shaped nuclear fragments. It has universal application, especially when the size of the incision is getting smaller in MSICS and phacofragmentation is being used as an adjunct to reduce the incision size. It can be used in situations like posterior polar cataracts, where pressure variations in the anterior chamber can be dangerous.
ABSTRACT
Manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) has existed as an alternative to conventional phacoemulsification since its inception. The size of the incision has been becoming smaller in MSICS to reduce the surgically induced astigmatism. Smaller incisions go hand in hand with nucleus debulking and fragmenting techniques which have been practiced over almost four decades. Such techniques have a learning curve and require meticulous execution. The authors describe a technique to achieve nucleus bisection or trisection or debulking in a closed anterior chamber. This technique has been in use for a long time; it has shown excellent results and has a shorter learning curve. Since it is done in a closed chamber, the risk to the corneal endothelium is minimized as the anterior chamber remains deep throughout the procedure. Sudden escape of the viscoelastic and shallowing of the chamber are prevented, and the corneal endothelium is well protected. It uses iris as support and reference. The specially designed chopper is an inexpensive addition to the instruments. Fragmentation is achieved in the proximal half of the chamber where control over instruments is maximum. Pristine clear cornea on day 1 is the rule rather than the exception with this technique. This is a safe and repeatable technique for phacofragmentation in cataract extraction
ABSTRACT
Advanced instrumentation and intraocular lenses (IOL) allow great refractive and visual outcome control to permit excellent correction of refractive aberrations. Residual astigmatism can be modified to provide depth of focus using an appropriate incision in the steepest meridian in manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS). The authors describe the nomogram for surgically correcting astigmatism (SCA). This technique can handle preoperative astigmatism of about 2.25 DCyl with the standard incisions梥traight incision of 5, 6, and 7 mm in length, the minimally curved frown incision, the frown incision, the frown incision with an accentuated frown, and the U incision placed on the steep axis in the superior or the temporal quadrant depending on the axis of pre-operative astigmatism.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To study the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the ophthalmologists in India regarding cataract extraction practices. Methods: A prospective, online, descriptive study was conducted from January 2022 to April 2022 using a self?developed validated questionnaire attached which was administered through a generated link. Results: The mean age of these 153 respondents was 47.02 (SD = 11.53) years with a male preponderance (70.59%). The majority (52.9%) had completed a fellowship after their post?graduation, and 56.20% provided sub?specialty services. Comprehensive ophthalmology (69.93%) and anterior segment (50.32%) practice were the most popular. Although 76.47% of respondents used a mix of techniques, 11.11% surgeons used only phaco?emulsification and 9.8% used only manual small? incision cataract surgery (MSICS) as the lone cataract treatment modality. Roughly 38% felt that outcomes were comparable for phaco?emulsification and MSICS, whereas about 44% opined that the outcomes of phaco?emulsification were better. MSICS outcomes were reported to be better by approximately 15%. The frown incision (53.59%), the straight incision (19.60%), and the straight incision with back cuts (10.45%) were popular. The majority (71.24%) of the respondents were willing to train fellow ophthalmologists and youngsters in MSICS. Standalone practices and family practices (42.48%), private eye institutes (10.45%), medical colleges (12.41%), and government non?teaching hospitals (11.11%) were the major service providers. 4% were working in rural hinterland. Conclusion: The majority of the surgeons use a mix of cataract extraction operative techniques. A large, willing talent pool of manual small?incision cataract surgeons exists. India can be a global hub for MSICS delivery and training