Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Fractal rev. psicol ; 24(3): 443-472, set.-dez. 2012.
Article in French | LILACS | ID: lil-660513

ABSTRACT

"Épicure, Démocrite, Lucrèce" (dans la lettre 56 à Hugo Boxel) et "Machiavel" (dans le Traité politique) sont les deux courants de pensée que Spinoza (1966[1674], 2002[1677]), cite de manière très élogieuse. Nous nous proposons d'étudier ici - selon une analyse comparative et à partir de la question éthico-sociale du Désir - les filiations et les différences de la philosophie spinoziste avec la pensée épicurienne et la pensée de Machiavel.


"Epicuro, Demócrito, Lucrécio" (na carta 56 a Hugo Boxel) e "Maquiavel" (no Tratado político) são as duas correntes de pensamento que Spinoza (1966[1674], 2009) cita de maneira bastante elogiosa. Nós nos propomos estudar, aqui, as filiações e as diferenças da filosofia spinozista com o pensamento epicureu e o pensamento de Maquiavel, segundo uma análise comparativa e a partir da questão ético-social do Desejo.


Epicurus, Democritus, Lucrecius (in the letter 56 to Hugo Boxel) and Machiavelli (in the Political Treaty) are the two streams of thought that Spinoza cites in a quite eulogistic way. We propose to study here the affiliations and the differences between the philosophies of Spinoza, Epicurus and Machiavelli in a comparative analysis, departing from the ethical and social issue of desire.


Subject(s)
Philosophy , Pleasure/ethics , Virtues
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL