ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to qualitatively demonstrate surface micro-morphological changes after the employment of different surface conditioning methods on high-alumina and glassy-matrix dental ceramics. Three disc-shaped high-alumina specimens (In-Ceram Alumina, INC) and 4 glassy-matrix ceramic specimens (Vitadur Alpha, V) (diameter: 5 mm and height: 5 mm) were manufactured. INC specimens were submitted to 3 different surface conditioning methods: INC1 - Polishing with silicon carbide papers (SiC); INC2 - Chairside air-borne particle abrasion (50 µm Al2O3); INC3 - Chairside silica coating (CoJet; 30 µm SiOx). Vitadur Alpha (V) specimens were subjected to 4 different surface conditioning methods: V1 - Polishing with SiC papers; V2 - HF acid etching; V3 - Chairside air-borne particle abrasion (50 µm Al2O3); V4 - Chairside silica coating (30 µm SiOx). Following completion of the surface conditioning methods, the specimens were analyzed using SEM. After polishing with SiC, the surfaces of V specimens remained relatively smooth while those of INC exhibited topographic irregularities. Chairside air-abrasion with either aluminum oxide or silica particles produced retentive patterns on both INC and V specimens, with smoother patterns observed after silica coating. V specimens etched with HF presented a highly porous surface. Chairside tribochemical silica coating resulted in smoother surfaces with particles embedded on the surface even after air-blasting. Surface conditioning using air-borne particle abrasion with either 50 µm alumina or 30 µm silica particles exhibited qualitatively comparable rough surfaces for both INC and V. HF acid gel created the most micro-retentive surface for the glassy-matrix ceramic tested.
Subject(s)
Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Ceramics/chemistry , Dental Bonding/methods , Resin Cements/chemistry , Air Abrasion, Dental , Cementation/methods , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Surface Properties , Tensile StrengthABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that mechanical polishing methods of ceramic surfaces allow similar superficial roughness to that of glazed surfaces. Twenty-five Vitadur Alpha ceramic discs (5 mm x 2 mm) were prepared according to the manufacturer's specifications. All specimens were glazed and randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=5), according to finishing and polishing protocols: G1: glazed (control); G2: diamond bur finishing; G3: G2 + silicon rubber tip polishing; G4: G3 + felt disc/diamond polishing paste; G5: G3 + felt disc impregnated with fine-particle diamond paste. Next, surface roughness means (Ra - æm) were calculated. Qualitative analysis was made by scanning electron microscopy. Surface roughness data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5 percent significance level. G1 and G4 were statistically similar (p>0.05). G2 presented the highest roughness means (p<0.05) followed by groups G3, G5, G4 and G1 in a decreasing order. The hypothesis was partially confirmed as only the mechanical polishing (G4) produced similar superficial roughness to that of surface glazing, although finishing and polishing are technically critical procedures.
O objetivo deste estudo foi testar a hipótese de que o acabamento e o polimento da superfície cerâmica produzem rugosidade superficial semelhante à superfície cerâmica vitrificada. Vinte e cinco corpos-de-prova (5 mm x 2 mm) da cerâmica Vitadur Alpha foram obtidos de acordo com as recomendações do fabricante. Todas os corpos-de-prova foram vitrificados e aleatoriamente divididos em 5 grupos (n=5), de acordo com os seguintes protocolos de acabamento e polimento: G1: vitrificação (controle); G2: abrasão com ponta diamantada; G3: G2 + acabamento com borrachas abrasivas; G4: G3 + polimento com pasta diamantada/disco de feltro; G5: G3 + disco de feltro impregnado com pasta diamantada. Após 6 análises individuais foi obtida 1 média por corpo-de-prova da rugosidade (Ra). A análise qualitativa foi realizada por microscopia eletrônica de varredura. Os valores médios de rugosidade foram submetidos à ANOVA e ao teste de Tukey com nível de significância de 5 por cento. G1 e G4 foram estatisticamente semelhantes (p>0.05). O grupo G2 apresentou o maior valor médio de rugosidade (p<0.05) seguido por G3, G5, G4 e G1 em ordem decrescente. A hipótese foi parcialmente confirmada, pois somente o polimento mecânico do grupo G4 produziu rugosidade superficial semelhante à da superfície vitrificada, embora o acabamento e o polimento sejam procedimentos críticos tecnicamente.