ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Cross-sectional studies have been conducted to evaluate the adequacy of prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism. However, these studies often evaluate prophylaxis on the data collection day, without analysing the prophylactic dose or duration and without reference to inappropriate use in patients without risk. A prospective, observational study was performed to assess the adequacy of prophylaxis in a general medicine ward of a university hospital. METHOD: In the analysis, the use of the proper prophylactic dose at the correct time, the use in patients with contraindications, and the misuse in patients without risk of venous thromboembolism were considered. RESULTS: A total of 245 patients were evaluated. Of these patients, 104 (42.4%) were considered to be at risk, and 82.7% either received adequate prophylaxis (i.e., the correct dose at the right time) or did not receive prophylaxis because it was contraindicated. Among the 141 patients who were not at risk, 81 (57.4%) incorrectly received prophylaxis, the majority (61/81) of whom presented with risk factors but did not demonstrate reduced mobility. Among the entire group, only 59.6% of patients were properly treated. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of prophylaxis adequacy should consider not only whether the correct dose is administered at the correct time but also whether it is used in patients with contraindications and whether it is inappropriately administered to patients who are not at risk. .
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Assessment/methods , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Algorithms , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hospitalization , Hospitals, University , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , Time FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUÇÃO: A literatura demonstra que tromboembolismo venoso permanece como uma doença subdiagnosticada entre os pacientes hospitalizados, com aproximadamente 25% dos casos associados à internação. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar as doenças associadas ao desenvolvimento de tromboembolismo pulmonar (TEP) diagnosticado em autópsias, e demonstrar a frequência de TEP como causa do óbito ou fator contributivo. MÉTODOS: Estudo caso-controle retrospectivo, realizado no Instituto Central do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, no período de 1995 a 2004. Revisamos os relatórios diagnósticos das autópsias, identificando TEP fatal, quando TEP foi a causa de morte, e TEP não fatal, quando TEP foi doença associada. RESULTADOS: 1.506 pacientes (502 casos e 1.004 controles), 18.359 óbitos no período, média 2.040; 71,2% desses submetidos a autópsias. Observou-se importante declínio nas taxas de autópsias. De 1995-1999 (87,2%) e 2000-2004 (54,4%); p = 0,016. Dos 502 casos (3,8%), em 328 (2,5%) TEP foi causa de morte e 174 (1,3%), causa contributiva. Gênero: 51,6% homens e 48,4% mulheres. Idade: TEP fatal (328) vs controles (1.004), diferença estatisticamente significativa (p = 0,013). Condições prevalentes: câncer grupo, 31,4%, pós-operatório grupo, 17,2%, infecção grupo, 11,7%, e AVC grupo, 11%. Câncer de pulmão, 3,5%, câncer de cérebro e linfoma, 2,8%. Tempo de internação foi utilizado como indicador de imobilização. Outras doenças: AVCH (7,7%), pós-operatório de abdome (6,7%), pneumonia (5,9%), AVCI (3,1%) e pós-operatório vascular (4%) foram frequentes no grupo controle. Em contrapartida, aterosclerose (1,4%), ITU (1,2%), pós-operatório de ginecologia (0,8%), pós-operatório de obstetrícia (0,6%) e doença falciforme (0,6%) foram frequentes no grupo TEP. Cirrose, média de 14,9 dias de internação dos controles vs TEP com 4,4 dias (p < 0,001). Análise multivariada incluiu as condições com p 0,20 da univariada, idade e tempo de internação...
INTRODUCTION: Literature shows that venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains as a sub-diagnostic disease among hospitalized patients, approximately 25% of all cases are associated to hospitalization. PURPOSE: Evaluate diseases associated to pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) development diagnosed in autopsies, and demonstrate the frequency of PE as cause of death or as a contributive factor. METHOD: The reports performed from 1995 to 2004 in a Brazilian tertiary referral medical school we reviewed for a retrospective study the autopsies diagnosis, identified as fatal PE, when PE was the cause of death and nonfatal PE, when PE was an associated disease. RESULTS: 1,506 patients (502 cases and 1004 controls), 18,359 deaths during the period, average 2,040; 71.2% of these were submitted to autopsies. It was observed an important decline in the autopsies rates. From 1995-1999 (87.2%) and 2000-2004 (54.4%) p = 0.016. From 502 cases (3.8%), 328 (2.5%) PE was the cause of death and 174 (1.3%) PE was contributive cause. Gender: 51.6% males and 48.4% females. AGE: fatal PE (328) vs controls (1,004) significant statistic difference (p = 0.013). Prevalent Conditions: cancer group, 31.4%, postsurgical group, 17.2%, infectious group, 11.7%, and CVA group, 11%. Pulmonary Cancer, 3.5%, Brain cancer and Lymphoma, 2.8%. Hospitalization period was taken as immobilization indicator. Other diseases: HCVA (7.7%), abdomen postsurgical (6.7%), pneumonia (5.9%), ICVA (3.1%) and vascular postsurgical (4%) were frequent in the control group. On the other hand, atherosclerosis (1.4%), UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) (1.2%), gynecology postsurgical (0.8%), obstetrics postsurgical (0.6%) and sickle cell anemia (0.6%) were frequent in the PE group. Cirrhosis, average of 14.9 hospitalization days of the controls vs PE with 4.4 days (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis includes the in univariated analysis with p 0.20, age and the hospitalization period. Protector factor for PE: Aortic...