Luteolin regulates M1 macrophage polarization by inhibiting glycolytic pathway induced by HIF-1 / 中国药理学通报

Aim To investigate the effect of luteolin on M1 macrophages polarization through HIF-1α-mediated glycolytic pathway. Methods RAW264.7 cells were divided into control groups(M0)and LPS+IFN-γ groups(M1). M1 groups were further divided into luteolin group, 2-DG(glycolysis inhibitor)group, luteolin+2-DG group,luteolin+DMOG(HIF-1α agonist)group. The protein expression levels of iNOS, Arg-1 and HIF-1α were detected by Western blot. Macrophage phenotype was detected by flow cytometry. In addition, the expression levels of IL-6 and IL-10 were measured by ELISA. The gene expression levels of GLUT1, HK2, PFK1, PK and HIF-1α were quantified by quantitative real-time PCR. Results Compared with M1 groups, luteolin and luteolin+2-DG treatment groups decreased the expression levels of GLUT1, HK2, PFK1, PK and HIF-1α related to glycolysis. In addition, luteolin and luteolin+2-DG treatment group significantly inhibited the expression of M1 macrophage markers such as iNOS, CD86 and IL-6, whereas up-regulated M2 macrophage markers Arg-1, CD206 and IL-10. Notably, the inhibitory effects of luteolin on M1 macrophages were restored by DMOG. Conclusion Luteolin regulates M1 macrophage polarization by inhibiting the glycolytic pathway induced by HIF-1α.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α/γ agonist tesaglitazar stabilizes atherosclerotic plaque in diabetic low density lipoprotein receptor knockout mice / 中华心血管病杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) α/γ agonist on atherosclerotic plaque stabilization in diabetic LDL receptor knockout (LDLr-/-) mice.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Female 4-week-old LDLr-/- mice fed with high-glucose and high-fat diet for 4 weeks were randomly divided into three groups (n = 15 each): control group (only fed with high-glucose and high-fat diet), diabetic group [induced by high-glucose and high-fat diet combined with a low-dose of streptozotocin (STZ)] without tesaglitazar and with tesaglitazar (20 µg/kg oral treatment). After 6 weeks, the mice were sacrificed, body weight, fasting blood glucose (Glu), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG) levels were measured. The expression of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, MCP-1 in the brachiocephalic atherosclerotic lesions were determined by Western blot and immunohistochemistry, respectively. Brachiocephalic artery was prepared for morphologic study (HE, oil red O, Sirius red staining) and immunohistochemical analysis (macrophage surface molecule-3, α-smooth muscle actin), respectively.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Serum TC [(32.34 ± 3.26) mmol/L vs. (16.17 ± 1.91) mmol/L], TG [(3.57 ± 0.99) mmol/L vs. (2.21 ± 0.11) mmol/L] and Glu [(15.21 ± 4.67) mmol/L vs. (6.89 ± 0.83) mmol/L] levels were significantly higher in diabetic group than in the control group (all P < 0.01). The expression of ICAM-1 (2.31 ± 0.35 vs.1.34 ± 0.21), VCAM-1 (1.65 ± 0.14 vs.0.82 ± 0.26), MCP-1 (2.27 ± 0.16 vs.1.56 ± 0.23) were significantly upregulated in diabetic group compared with control group (all P < 0.01). Brachiocephalic atherosclerotic plaque area [(4.597 ± 1.260)×10(3) µm(2) vs. (0.075 ± 0.030)×10(3) µm(2)], lipid deposition [(47.23 ± 2.64)% vs. (9.67 ± 1.75)%], Mac-3 positive area [(19.15 ± 3.51)% vs. (1.72 ± 0.16)%], α-smooth muscle actin [(5.54 ± 1.17)% vs. (2.13 ± 0.41)%] and collagen content [(4.27 ± 0.74)% vs. (0.43 ± 0.09)%] were all significantly larger/higher in diabetic LDLr-/- mice than in the control group (all P < 0.01). While tesaglitazar treatment significantly reduced serum TC [(30.47 ± 3.18) mmol/L], TG [(3.14 ± 0.71) mmol/L] and Glu [(7.92 ± 1.28) mmol/L] levels (all P < 0.01). Similarly, the expression of ICAM-1 [(1.84 ± 0.22)], VCAM-1 [(1.27 ± 0.11)], MCP-1 [(1.83 ± 0.24)], brachiocephalic atherosclerotic lesion area[(1.283 ± 0.410)×10(3) µm(2)], lipid deposition[(23.52 ± 1.39)%] were also significantly reduced by tesaglitazar (all P < 0.05). Moreover, tesaglitazar increased α-smooth muscle actin [(9.46 ± 1.47)%] and collagen content [(6.32 ± 1.15)%] in diabetic LDLr-/- mice (all P < 0.05). In addition, lipid deposition and Mac-3 positive areas [(10.67 ± 0.88)% vs. (15.83 ± 1.01)%] in the aortic root were also reduced in tesaglitazar treated diabetic LDLr-/- mice (P < 0.01).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Tesaglitazar has anti-inflammatory effects in the diabetic LDLr-/- mice. Tesaglitazar could reduce lipid deposition, increase collagen and α-SMA content in the brachiocephalic atherosclerotic lesions, thus, stabilize atherosclerotic plaque in this model.</p>

Renoprotective effect of alprostadil in combination with statins in patients with mild to moderate renal failure undergoing coronary angiography / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>The role of alprostadil and statins in contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy of combined therapy with alprostadil and statins in protecting renal function and preventing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients undergoing coronary angiography.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 156 consecutive patients with mild to moderate renal failure who underwent coronary angiography were enrolled in our study, and randomly categorized into two groups. In the statins group, 80 patients were treated with statins before and after coronary angiography. In the alprostadil plus statins group, 76 patients were treated with statins and alprostadil before and after coronary angiography. Serum creatinine (SCr), serum cystatin (CysC) and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) were detected after administration of contrast media, and adverse events were evaluated within six months.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>In both groups, the SCr, CysC and NGAL significantly increased after coronary angiography and peaked at 48, 24 and 6 hours, respectively. SCr, CysC and NGAL were significantly lower in the alprostadil plus statins group than in the statins group (P < 0.05). The incidence of CIN in the alprostadil plus statins group was slightly lower than in the statins group. The incidence of adverse events within six months in the alprostadil plus statins group was significantly lower than in the statins group (P = 0.034).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Intravenous alprostadil in combination with oral statins is superior to statins alone for protecting renal function in patients with mild to moderate renal dysfunction who undergo coronary angiography, and can reduce the incidence of adverse events seen within six months.</p>