Anatomical Evaluation of Ulnar Nerve according to the Elbow Position

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the anatomy of the ulnar nerve according to the degree of elbow flexion and to obtain optimal elbow position for ulnar nerve conduction study. METHODS: Eleven elbows in nine cadavers were dissected. We estimated the 10 cm elbow segment to be the distance between 2 points, 4 cm distal and 6 cm proximal to the center of the cubital tunnel, which was determined to be the halfway point between the medial epicondyle and olecranon with elbow position in extension and 45o, 90o, 135o flexion. Anatomical measurements of the actual length of ulnar nerve, distance between medial epicondyle and ulnar nerve, and distance between medial epicondyle and olecranon were obtained in each position. The actual length of the ulnar nerve was measured between two points of the ulnar nerve closest to the landmarks of the estimated 10 cm with flexible ligature. RESULTS: The actual lengths of ulnar nerve were 10.23 cm, 10.00 cm, 9.44 cm, and 9.08 cm in elbow extension, and 45o, 90o, 135o flexion, respectively. The difference between actual length and estimated lengths were least in 45o elbow flexion (p=0.0001). The distance between medial epicondyle and olecranon increased with increasing elbow flexion (p=0.0001). However, there was no difference in the distance between medial epicondyle and ulnar regardless of the elbow position. As a result, the ulnar nerve seemed to have migrated anteriorly in the cubital tunnel with increasing elbow flexion. CONCLUSION: This study suggest that the optimal angle in ulnar nerve conduction study would be 45o flexion, under the condition that the distance measurement is through the halfway point between the medial epicondyle and olecranon.

Comparison of Outcome between Patients the Traumatic and Non-traumatic Spinal Cord Injured

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the difference of outcome variables and demographic features between traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. METHOD: Medical records of 87 spinal cord injured patients were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into traumatic and non-traumatic groups. The etiology, level and completeness of SCI were investigated. The functional evaluation was performed by Frankel's classification, American spinal cord injury association (ASIA) motor and sensory scores, and modified Barthel scores at the time of admission and discharge. Bladder function and emptying method were also investigated. RESULTS: Spinal cord injury of non-traumatic etiology was more likely to result in a incomplete injury and more prevalent in females. At admission, the ASIA motor and sensory scores and modified Barthel index of non-traumatic spinal cord injury patient were higher than those of traumatic patients. At discharge, same results were observed for ASIA motor and sensory scores, but the modified Barthel scores showed no difference between the two groups. The changes of the scores between time of admission and discharge showed no significant difference in the two groups. There was no significant difference of bladder type and bladder emptying method. CONCLUSION: This study suggest that favorable outcome in non-traumatic spinal cord injury patients might be due to better functional status at the time of admission and not due to the degree of recovery.