Follow up of a cohort of patients with acute coronary syndrome without obstructive coronary disease. At a tertiary care center during 2019 and 2020

Introduction: 10% of acute myocardial infarctions occur with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). These myocardial infarctions represent a group of conditions with less than 50% stenosis. The characteristics of the population with MINOCA in the region are unknown. The objective is to characterize the population with MINOCA and identify the factors associated with adverse outcomes. Materials and methods: this was an analytical cohort study which identified various char acteristics of patients with MINOCA at a tertiary care center in Pereira. From January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020, 1,500 coronary arteriographies were reviewed; 292 met the angiographic criteria for MINOCA and, of these, 163 patients met the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was a composite of hospitalization for angina/heart failure, reperfusion therapy, and death from cardiovascular causes and from any cause at six months and one year. Results: the median age was 64 years; 54% (n=88) were men. Arterial hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity (n=100; 61.3%), and the most common electrocardiographic presenta tion was T wave inversion (29.7%; n=47). Altogether, 19.3% (n=28) and 25.5% (n=37) had some outcome at six months and one year. One-year mortality was 5.5%. On multivariate analysis, the initial troponin, moderate to severe aortic regurgitation and right bundle branch block were associ ated with the event. Conclusion: we have presented the Colombian study with the largest cohort of patients with MINOCA, identifying factors associated with adverse outcomes. (Acta Med Colomb 2022; 48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2023.2742).

Efectos de la fragilidad en los resultados adversos de la cirugía cardiaca en ancianos / Effects of frailty on the adverse outcomes of cardiac surgery in the elderly

Resumen Introducción: la fragilidad es una condición del paciente anciano, caracterizada por un estado de vulnerabilidad para desenlaces adversos en salud, incluidos los causados por la cirugía cardíaca. Objetivo: establecer la prevalencia de fragilidad en el contexto prequirúrgico del anciano sometido a cirugía cardiaca y establecer el riesgo de desenlaces adversos otorgado por esta condición. Metodología: estudio analítico de cohorte que valoró la fragilidad en 66 pacientes ancianos sometidos a cirugía cardiaca mediante el fenotipo físico de fragilidad de Fried. Se realizó un seguimiento a 30 días, durante el cual se estableció la prevalencia de fragilidad y el riesgo otorgado por esta condición a los desenlaces adversos de la cirugía cardiaca. Resultados: la edad de los pacientes osciló entre los 60 y los 83 años; la mediana fue de 70,5 años. La prevalencia de la fragilidad fue del 31,8%. La fragilidad incrementó los siguientes desenlaces adversos postoperatorios: muerte (p 0,001), ventilación prolongada (p 0,001), uso prolongado de vasoactivos (p 0,001) e infección del sitio operatorio (p 0,004). El riesgo de mortalidad otorgado por la fragilidad fue más alto que el de los puntajes usuales de valoración como el EuroSCORE II (HR 5,49; IC95% 1,0-28,5 vs. HR 1,17 IC95% 1,0-1,29). Conclusión: la fragilidad es una condición frecuente en el paciente anciano sometido a cirugía cardiaca e incrementa el riesgo de eventos adversos, en especial el de mortalidad. Se recomienda incluir la medición de la fragilidad en el protocolo prequirúgico del paciente anciano.

Abstract Introduction: Frailty is a common condition in the elderly patient, and is noted for its vulnerability for adverse outcomes in health, including those caused by cardiac surgery. Objective: To establish the prevalence of frailty in the pre-surgical context of the elderly subjected to cardiac surgery, as well as to establish the risk of adverse outcomes due to this condition. Method: An analytical cohort study was performed in order to evaluate frailty in 66 elderly patients subjected to cardiac surgery, using the physical phenotype of frailty described by Fried. A follow-up was made at 30 days, during which the frailty prevalence was established, as well the risk of adverse outcomes of the cardiac surgery due to this condition. Results: The age of the patients varied between 60 and 83 years, with a median of 70.5 years. The prevalence of frailty was 31.8%. Frailty increased the following post-surgical adverse outcomes: death (P = .001), longer ventilation time (P = .001), prolonged use of vasoactive drugs (P = .001), and infection of the surgical site (P = .004). The mortality risk due to frailty was higher than that of the usual evaluation scores such as Euro SCORE II (HR 5.49; 95% CI; 1.0-28.5 vs. HR 1.17: 95% CI; 1.0-1.29). Conclusion: Frailty is a common condition in the elderly patient subjected to cardiac surgery, and increases the risk of adverse events, particularly, mortality. It is recommended to use measurements of frailty in the pre-surgical protocol of the elderly patient.

Terapia de resincronización cardíaca con o sin cardiodesfibrilador versus terapia con desfibrilador automático, Pereira (Colombia): un estudio de cohorte / Terapia de ressincronização cardíaca com ou sem cardiodesfibrilador versus terapia desfibrilador automático, Pereira (Colômbia): Um estudo de coorte / Cardiac resyncronization therapy with or without cardioverter-defibrillator versus defibrillator therapy alone, Pereira (Colombia): a cohort study

Comparar la supervivencia de pacientes con resincronizador cardíaco con o sin desfibrilador con la de pacientes con cardiodesfibrilador. Materiales y métodos: cohorte retrospectiva cuyo desenlace primario fue la mortalidad de origen cardíaco; la exposición fueron las terapias electrofisiológicas y la información se obtuvo de las historias clínicas y de otros registros médicos. Resultados: se estudiaron 70 pacientes de edad avanzada con dispositivos funcionales. El 82 % recibieron tratamiento farmacológico optimizado. No se encontró asociación significativa entre la probabilidad de supervivencia y la terapia de resincronización cardíaca con o sin cardiodesfibrilador versus la terapia con cardiodesfibrilador (log rank test p = 0,54), pero sí un mayor tiempo de supervivencia en los primeros (ANOVA p = 0,0012). La tasa de peligro fue 0,017 para el día 371 y del 0,15 para el día 2169. Durante el período de observación se presentaron 14 muertes, tres de ellas atribuibles a etiología no cardíaca. Conclusión: se observó que la terapia con resincronizador cardíaco se asoció de forma significativa con un mayor tiempo supervivencia...

To evaluate survival in patients with cardiac resynchronization with or without cardioverterdefibrillatorversus patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator alone. Materials and methods: Retrospective cohort, the primary end point was death from cardiac causes, the exposure was electrophysiological therapies, and the information sources were medical files and other records. Results: 70 elderly patients with functional devices; 82 % of them received optimized medical therapy. Nosignificant association was found between survival of patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy withor without defibrillator and cardioverter-defibrillator therapy alone (log rank test, p = 0.54), but the formerhad a longer survival time (ANOVA p = 0.0012). The hazard ratio was 0.017 for day 371 and 0.15 for day 169. Fourteen deaths occurred during the observation period, three of them from non-cardiac causes. Conclusion: Cardiac resynchronization therapy was associated with significantly longer survival time...

Comparar a sobrevivência de pacientes com ressincronizador cardíaco com ou sem desfibrilador em pacientes com desfibriladores. Materiais e métodos: corte retrospectivo de cujo principal resultado primário foi a mortalidade de origem cardíaca; a exposição foram as terapias e eletrofisiológicos e a informação foi obtida a partir da história clínica e outros registros médicos. Resultados: Foram estudados 70 pacientes idosos com dispositivos funcionais. 82 % receberam tratamento farmacológico otimizado. Não foi encontrado associação significativa entre a probabilidade de sobrevivencia e terapia de ressincronização cardíaca com ou sem cardiodesfibrilador versus a terapia cardiodesfibrilador (log rank test, p = 0,54 ), mas há um maior tempo de sobrevivência no primeiro (ANOVA, p = 0,0012 ). A taxa de risco foi 0,017 para o dia 371 e 0,15 para o dia 2169. Durante o período de observação, apresentaram 14 mortes, três deles atribuíveis a etiologia não cardíaca. Conclusão: constatou-se que a terapia com ressincronizador cardíaco foi significativamente asociado com um maior tempo de sobrevivência...