Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Type of study
Language
Year range
1.
IRCMJ-Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2009; 11 (3): 340-343
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-94036

ABSTRACT

Six cases of ameloblastoma were treated by enucleation and peripheral osteoctomy during 1992-2001. Histologically, desmoplastic reaction, epithelial cells with severe fibrous, and keratin formation in the acanthomatous follicles were seen. The disorder was in the mandible in five cases, and in the maxilla in one case. Two cases were male and four were female, and the age at surgery was between 20 to 28 years. For all cases, a uniform surgical protocol was applied. The lesions were removed primarily by enucleation with peripheral ostectomy. There was recurrence in two cases. An enbloc resection was done for the first case and a radical resection with titanium bone plate reconstruction for the second case. The patients did not have any problem, bone grafting being recommended for the first case as soon as possible. Based on our knowledge, the procedure was successful in approximately 70% of cases, but more radical surgery methods may be recommended in the initial surgery


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Mandibular Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mandible , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Recurrence
2.
IRCMJ-Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2009; 11 (4): 431-436
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-100185

ABSTRACT

The ultimate goal of oral health care providers is not only to restore function, but also to relieve pain. This study was undertaken to compare the analgesic efficacy of ibuprofen, celecoxib and tramadol in patients after extraction of mandibular third molar teeth. Forty one patients entered our study and were randomly divided into three groups. Group 1 received ibuprofen [600 mg] and groups 2 and 3 received celecoxib [200 mg] and tramadol [100mg] respectively, 8 hours and one hour before extraction of mandibular third molar teeth. The patients reported their pain severity in a questionnaire four and eight hours after the tooth extraction. To evaluate the side effects of the drug, the patients were asked to report if they had any problem using the drug. Fourteen patients received ibuprofen, 15 celecoxib and 12 tramadol for relief of pain. The pain severity in ibuprofen group, 4 and 8 hours after tooth extraction was less than celecoxib, and was less in these two groups when compared to tramadol group but no significant difference was found between the three groups. No undesirable side effects were reported in ibuprofen and celecoxib groups, but side effects such as headache, nausea, vomiting, oral dryness, drowsiness, tremor and vertigo were observed in the tramadol group. All patients who used tramadol were not satisfied from the drug while it had disturbed their daily activities. Regarding the very little side effects of celecoxib and its desirable analgesic effects, it can be administered as one of the analgesic drugs of choice in dentistry


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Molar, Third , Ibuprofen , Pyrazoles , Sulfonamides , Tramadol , Pain/drug therapy , Mandible , Analgesia
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL