ABSTRACT
FUNDAMENTO: A necessidade de melhorar a acurácia do teste de esforço, determinou o desenvolvimento de escores, cuja aplicabilidade já foi amplamente reconhecida. OBJETIVO: Avaliação prognóstica do coronariopata estável através de um novo escore simplificado. MÉTODOS: Um novo escore foi aplicado em 372 coronariopatas multiarteriais e função ventricular preservada, 71,8 por cento homens, idade média 59,5 (± 9,07) anos, randomizados para angioplastia, revascularização cirúrgica e tratamento clínico, acompanhados por 5 anos. Óbito cardiovascular foi o desfecho primário. Infarto do miocárdio não-fatal, óbito e re-intervenção formaram o desfecho combinado secundário. O escore baseou-se numa equação previamente validada resultante da soma de 1 ponto para: sexo masculino, história de infarto, angina, diabete, uso de insulina e ainda 1 ponto para cada década de vida a partir dos 40 anos. Teste positivo adicionou 1 ponto. RESULTADOS: Ocorreram 36 óbitos (10 no grupo angioplastia, 15 no grupo revascularização e 11 no grupo clínico), p = 0,61. Observou-se 93 eventos combinados: 37 no grupo angioplastia, 23 no grupo revascularização e 33 no grupo clínico (p = 0,058). 247 pacientes apresentaram escore clínico > 5 pontos e 216 > 6 pontos. O valor de corte > 5 ou > 6 pontos identificou maior risco, com p = 0,015 e p = 0,012, respectivamente. A curva de sobrevida mostrou uma incidência de óbito após a randomização diferente naqueles com escore > 6 pontos (p = 0,07), e uma incidência de eventos combinados diferente entre pacientes com escore < 6 e > 6 pontos (p = 0,02). CONCLUSÃO: O novo escore demonstrou consistência na avaliação prognóstica do coronariopata estável multiarterial.
BACKGROUND: The need to improve the exercise testing accuracy, pushed the development of scores, whose applicability was already broadly recognized. OBJECTIVE: Prognostic evaluation of stable coronary disease through a new simplified score. METHODS: A new score was applied in 372 multivessel coronary patients with preserved ventricular function, 71.8 percent male, age: 59.5 (± 9.07) years old, randomized to medical treatment, surgery (CABG) or angioplasty (PTCA), with 5 years of follow-up. Cardiovascular death was considered the primary endpoint. Non-fatal myocardial infarction, death and re-intervention were considered for a combined secondary endpoint. The score was based on an equation previously validated, resulting from a sum of one point for: male gender, infarction history, angina, diabetes, insulin use and one point for each decade of life after 40 years old. Positive exercise testing summed one additional point. RESULTS: Thirty six deaths was observed (10 in group PTCA, 15 in CABG and 11 in the clinical group), p = 0.61. We observed 93 combined events: 37 in PTCA group, 23 in CABG and 33 in the clinical group (p = 0.058). 247 patients presented clinical score > 5 points and 216 > 6 points. The cutoff point > 5 or > 6 points identified higher risk, p = 0.015 and p = 0.012, respectively. The survival curve showed a different death incidence after the randomization when score reached 06 points or more (p = 0.07), and a distinct incidence of combined events between the patients with score < 6 and > 6 points (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The new score was consistent for multiarterial stable coronary disease risk stratification.
FUNDAMENTO: La necesidad de mejorar la exactitud de las pruebas de estrés, determinó el desarrollo de los puntajes, cuya aplicación fue ampliamente reconocida. OBJETIVO: La evaluación pronóstica del coronariópata estable a través de un nuevo score simplificado. MÉTODOS: Un nuevo score se aplicó en 372 coronariópatas multiarteriales y función ventricular preservada, el 71,8 por ciento varones, edad media de 59,5 (± 9,07) años, randomizados para angioplastia, revascularización quirúrgica y tratamiento clínico, seguidos de cinco años. Muerte cardiovascular fue el resultado primario. El infarto de miocardio no fatal, la muerte y la re-intervención formaron el desenlace combinado secundario. El score se basó en una ecuación previamente validada resultante de la suma de 1 punto a: sexo masculino, antecedentes de infarto, angina, diabetes, uso de insulina y todavía un punto por cada década de vida después de 40 años. Prueba positiva añadida 1 punto. RESULTADOS: Hubo 36 muertes (10 en el grupo de angioplastia, 15 en el grupo de revascularización y 11 en el grupo clínico), p = 0,61. Se observó 93 eventos combinados: 37 en el grupo angioplastia, 23 en el grupo revascularización y 33 en el grupo clínico (p = 0,058). Presentaron score clínico > 5 puntos y 216 > 6 puntos 247 pacientes. El valor de corte > 5 o > 6 puntos identificó un mayor riesgo, con p = 0,015 y p = 0,012, respectivamente. La curva de sobrevida mostró una incidencia de muerte después de la aleatorización que aquellos con score > 6 puntos (p = 0,07), y una incidencia de eventos combinados diferentes entre los pacientes con score < 6 y > 6 puntos (p = 0,02). CONCLUSIÓN: El nuevo score demostró consistencia en la evaluación pronóstica del coronariópata estable multiarterial. (Arq Bras Cardiol 2011;96(5):411-419).
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Angina Pectoris , Coronary Disease , Exercise Test/methods , Myocardial Infarction , Age Factors , Angina Pectoris/epidemiology , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/mortality , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Coronary Artery Bypass/mortality , Coronary Artery Bypass , Coronary Disease/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Epidemiologic Methods , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Prognosis , Time FactorsABSTRACT
PURPOSE--To describe groups of patients who have obstructive and non-obstructive coronary artery disease, through computadorized exercise stress test. METHODS--The test was done in 121 patients, all male, divided into 3 groups: GN group, 50 patients with normal electrocardiographic response to exercise; GLO group, 40 patients with obstructive coronary artery disease and GNO group, 31 patients with normal coronary arteries, showing one or more of the following entities: intramural coronary traject, coronary tortuosity, slow flow, mitral valve prolapse or left ventricular hypertrophy. GLO and GNO groups presented with abnormal response of the ST segment during exercise. The quantitative variables registered by computer were particularly analyzed as follows: STL (point Y depression), slope, index and ST segment integral. The magnitude of ST vector was visually measured and quantified. The statistic study was made through ANOVA and multiples comparison by the Scheffe's method, Fisher's test, quisquare and sensibility, specificity and accuracy calculation. RESULTS--There was a significant statistic difference among the 3 groups relative to slope and index (p < 0.05). The integral variable of ST segment did not allow us to differentiate the GLO and GNO groups. In the association study between the ST vector magnitude and abnormal T loop, there was an increase in sensibility of 15//in the exercise stress test. CONCLUSION--The ST segment slope below zero values, define patients having obstructive disease, and the opposite, non-obstructive disease. Values of ST segment index lower than -2 are linked to obstructive disease and higher than -2 linked to non-obstructive. Values of ST segment lower than -7 microV. s separate individuals with normal exercise stress test from those with ischemic type response. The magnitude of ST vector equal to or lower than 0.20mV define normal vectorcardiographic response to the exercise