Distribution of the members of the Pipiens Assemblage in the sympatric area from Argentina: which is where and when?

Given their medical and veterinary relevance, the members of the Pipiens Assemblage are a worldwide target of ecological research. The distribution of Culex pipiens s.s. and Cx. quinquefasciatus converge in Buenos Aires, Argentina, where hybrids have been detected. Each member of the assemblage exhibits a distinct eco-physiological behaviour that can affect its efficiency in pathogen transmission. Our aim was to identify the environmental drivers for the spatio-temporal distribution of each member, focusing on latitudinal and urbanisation gradients. Immatures of mosquitoes were surveyed in artificial containers found within 11 public cemeteries, raised up to the adult stage and identified by their male genitalia. The distribution of each member was associated with the environment in a Generalized Linear Model. The variable accounting for most of the heterogeneity was latitude; Cx. quinquefasciatus was collected more frequently at northern cemeteries, whereas Cx. pipiens and hybrids were more likely at the southern extreme. The urbanisation gradient was also associated with the occurrence of Cx. quinquefasciatus and hybrids at the high and low end, respectively. Other relevant variables were cemetery total area, the proportion with graves and the presence of plastic flowers in the containers. The spatial distribution of the members of the Pipiens Assemblage within the sympatric region in South America is driven by environmental features. The information presented herein provides essential baseline data for surveillance programs and control activities.

Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, and dengue in Argentina: current knowledge and future directions

Since the reinfestation of South American countries by Ae. aegypti, dengue fever (DF) and dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) have become a major public health concern. The aim of this paper was to review the information related with Aedes vectors and dengue in Argentina since the reintroduction of Ae. aegypti in 1986. The geographic distribution of Ae. albopictus is restricted to the Northeast, and that of Ae. aegypti has expanded towards the South and the West in comparison with the records during the eradication campaign in the 1960s. Since 1998, 4,718 DF cases have been reported concentrated in the provinces of Salta, Formosa, Misiones, Jujuy and Corrientes. Despite the circulation of three dengue virus serotypes (DENV-1, -2 and -3) in the North of the country, DHF has not occurred until the present. The information published over the last two decades regarding mosquito abundance, temporal variations, habitat characteristics, competition, and chemical and biological control, was reviewed. Considering the available information, issues pending in Argentina are discussed. The presence of three DENV, the potential spread of Ae. albopictus, and the predicted climate change suggest that dengue situation will get worse in the region. Research efforts should be increased in the Northern provinces, where DHF is currently an actual risk.

Variacion espacio-temporal del riesgo de transmision de dengue en la ciudad de Buenos Aires / Spatio-temporal variability in the transmission of dengue in Buenos Aires city

Los casos de dengue detectados en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires entre 1999 y 2000 confirmaron la posibilidad de brotes epidémicos. Para estudiar el riesgo de transmisión de dengue espacial y temporalmente se midió la actividad de su vector, el mosquito Aedes aegypti. La actividad de ovipostura del vector mostró un patrón de distribución heterogéneo en el tiempo y el espacio. Ocurrió entre octubre y mayo. En las áreas del Norte, Oeste y Sur de la ciudad (periferia) el vector fue detectado entre la primavera y el otoño en tanto que en las áreas del Este (microcentro-río) sólo en el verano. La proporción de sitios infestados varió entre los 3 períodos de estudio, pero las zonas infestadas coincidieron espacialmente. Aunque se observó variación anual y espacial de la infestación, el patrón se repitió durante los 3 años de estudio sugiriendo una dinámica estable. Las áreas de la ciudad no infestadas presentaron las mayores densidades de población y de empleados, mientras que las infestadas durante los 3 períodos presentaron las menores densidades. Esto podría representar una atenuación del riesgo, ya que no coincide la mayor densidad de habitantes con la mayor infestación. El riesgo de transmisión desde el punto de vista del vector se concentraría entre enero y marzo y ocuparía el 50% de la superficie de la ciudad en la periferia.