ABSTRACT
Con el objetivo de identificar metodologías para la identificación e incorporación efectiva de las consideraciones y perspectiva de los usuarios al desarrollo de Guías de Práctica Clínica, se realizo una revisión sistemática de la literatura disponible. Un total de 729 artículos fueronidentificados a partir la búsqueda inicial, de estos, 18 cumplieron los criterios y fueron incluidos en la revisión. Los artículos fueron valorados según calidad metodológica y se extrajo de ellos lainformación relevante. No se encontraron artículos metodológicos que describieran o evaluaran una metodología explicita para incorporar las consideraciones de los pacientes en el desarrollo de GPC. Las técnicas más utilizadas para estos procesos son las formales de consenso tales como Delphi, grupos focales, reuniones de análisis de los interesados, encuestas, escalas de preferencias y talleres. Las experiencias reportadas coinciden en la necesidad de vincular a lospacientes durante las etapas de priorización y aprobación de las recomendaciones...
In order to identify methodologies for effective identification and incorporation of the user considerationsand perspective to the development of clinical practice guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was conducted. A total of 729 articles were identified from the initial search of these, 18 met the criteria and were included in the review. The items were valued according to methodological quality and extracted relevant information from them. No methodological itemswere found that described or evaluated a specific methodology that incorporates considerations of the patients in the development of GPC. The techniques used for these processes were the formal ones such as Delphi, focus groups, stakeholder analysis, surveys, workshops and preference scales. The reported experiences agree on the need to link patients during the stages of prioritization and approval of the recommendations...
In order to identify methodologies for effective identification and incorporation of the user considerationsand perspective to the development of clinical practice guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was conducted. A total of 729 articles were identified from the initial search of these, 18 met the criteria and were included in the review. The items were valued according to methodological quality and extracted relevant information from them. No methodological items were found that described or evaluated a specific methodology that incorporates considerations of the patients in the development of GPC. The techniques used for these processes were theformal ones such as Delphi, focus groups, stakeholder analysis, surveys, workshops and preferencescales. The reported experiences agree on the need to link patients during the stages of prioritization and approval of the recommendations...