ABSTRACT
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the provision of health services to patients with chronic dis-eases, and the Medication Therapy Management, an integral part of pharmaceutical care can lead to an improvement in clinical parameters impacted by the pandemic. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical impact of MTM-PC on systemic arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus (DM) in comparison with the changes imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic in the primary healthcare scope. Methods: This is a quasi-experimental, single-arm, be-fore-and-after study, with data collection from July 1, 2019 to October 31, 2022. Data from patients at the pharmaceutical services, of the teaching-Pharmacy of UFJF, were included in the study and were divided into pre-pandemic and pandemic period, considering baseline data and the data related to the reintroduction of face-to-face care in the office as an endpoint.. Data were collected on blood pressure, lipidic profile, glycemia, use of statins and acetylsalicylic acid, cardiovascular risk, and psychosocial data, consequences of social isolation on mental health, medication prescription and life habits. Data were analyzed using the MINITAB v19 software, considering a significance level of 5%. Results: During the pandemic without MTM-PC it was found that blood pressure and HDL increased comparing the pre-pandemic with the pandemic without MTM-PC, respectively, SBP 117.5±8.86 and 134.75±12.43; DBP 71.25±3.54 and 83.25±11.65; HDL 45.25±7.80 and 52.38±12.52. Comparatively, it was verified that the blood pressure values were maintained and, the MTM-PC changed parameters like HbA1c 7.890±1.798, [p=0.028] and 7.325±1.30; HDL48.00±6.00 and 59.00±10.56, [p=0.020]. There was a change in both mean of cardiovascular risk, the global scale 13.69±8.08 to 22.38±7.28 and the optimized scale 8.35±6.71 to 16.10±5.83, [p=0.38], with a break in the trend of increased risk with the MTM-PC. The therapeutic load of drugs used for hypertension and diabetes remained below the limit value of 75%. Conclusion: There was evidence that the pandemic changed parameters such as blood pressure and cardiovascular risk. Additionally, the MTM-PC may be able to reduce the impact of the pandemic on glycated hemoglobin, improve HDL cholesterol levels and break a trend of increased cardiovascular risk (AU).
Introdução: A pandemia de COVID-19 impactou na prestação de serviços à saúde aos pacientes portadores de doenças crônicas e o Medication Therapy Management (MTM-PC), parte integrante do cuidado farmacêutico, pode acarretar melhora dos parâmetros clínicos impactados pela pandemia. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o impacto clínico do cuidado farmacêutico na hipertensão arterial sistêmica (HAS) e diabetes mellitus (DM) diante às mudanças impostas pela pandemia de COVID-19 no âmbito da atenção primária à saúde. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo quase-experimental, single arm, do tipo antes e depois, com a coleta de dados de 01 julho de 2019 a 31 de outubro de 2022. Foram incluídos no estudo dados de pacientes do consultório farmacêutico da Farmácia Uni-versitária - UFJF que foram divididos em pré-pandemia e pandemia, considerando o baseline e os dados relativos à reintrodução do atendimento presencial no consultório como endpoint. Foram coletados dados de pressão arterial, perfil lipídico, glicemia capilar, uso de estatinas e ácido acetilsalicílico, risco cardiovascular e dados psicossociais, consequências do isolamento social na saúde mental, prescrição de medicamentos e hábitos de vida. Os dados foram analisados no software MINITAB v19, considerando o nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: Durante a pan-demia sem o MTM-PC verificou-se que a pressão arterial e o HDL aumentaram, PAS 117,5±8,86 e 134,75±12,43; PAD 71,25±3,54 e 83,25±11,65; HDL 45,25± 7,80 e 52,38±12,52. Comparativamente, verificou-se que os valores de pressão arterial se mantiveram e os parâmetros de hemoglobina glicada e HDL melhoraram com o MTM-PC, HbA1c 7,890±1,798, [p=0,028] e 7,325±1,30; HDL 48,00±6,00 e 59,00±10,56, [p=0,020]. Consequentemente, refletiu-se no aumento do risco cardiovascular pela pandemia, tanto na escala global 13,69±8,08 para 22,38±7,28, quanto otimizada, 8,35± 6,71 para 16,10±5,83, [p=0,38], havendo a quebra de tendência no aumento do risco com o MTM-PC. A carga terapêutica dos medicamentos utilizados para hipertensão e diabetes se manteve abaixo do valor limite de 75%. Conclusão: Evidenciou-se que a pandemia modificou parâmetros como pressão arterial e risco cardiovascular. E que o MTM-PC foi capaz de reduzir o impacto da pandemia na hemoglobina glicada, melhorar os níveis de colesterol HDL e quebrar uma tendência do aumento do risco cardiovascular (AU).
Subject(s)
Humans , Pharmaceutical Services , Diabetes Mellitus , COVID-19 , HypertensionABSTRACT
Abstract In Brazil, insulin analogs stand out as one of the most demanded medications by judicial means. However, the guarantee of judicial access does not guarantee rational use. In context, pharmacotherapeutic follow-up (PF) is shown to be clinical effective strategy for patients with diabetes. To evaluate direct medical costs one year after performing PF in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus using insulin analogs ordered by court in Public Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS). This is a partial economic analysis, nested within a quasi-experimental study. Patients with T1DM who receive insulin analogs by judicialization in a medium-sized Brazilian city participated. The PF was conducted following the method adapted from the Pharmacotherapy workup (PW). Data were collected considering the period of one year before the start of the intervention and one year after the start of the intervention. Direct medical costs were evaluated and the difference in costs was calculated. 28 patients participated in the intervention. After PF, direct costs were -$3,696.78. Sensitivity analysis showed that there is a 33.4 % chance for PF to present cost savings when compared to baseline. The PF has the potential to reduce direct medical costs from the perspective of the SUS.
ABSTRACT
Objetivos: contribuir para a geração de dados de avaliação econômica de estratégias de empoderamento farmacoterapêutico para pacientes com Diabetes Mellitus tipo 2 (DM tipo 2). Métodos: este estudo farmacoeconômico é aninhado a um ensaio clínico com controle não randomizado que incluiu pacientes ≥18 anos de idade, cadastrados no HIPERDIA. Os pacientes foram alocados em um modelo de Markov conforme valores de hemoglobina glicada do acompanhamento. As probabilidades do surgimento de complicações relativas ao DM, incluindo-se óbito, foram estimadas por dez anos. Cada complicação do DM tipo 2 teve seu custo estabelecido para determinação do custo anual. Resultados: entre os participantes da intervenção, não ocorrem óbitos ocasionados por DM tipo 2, e a progressão de complicações mantém-se estável durante os anos simulados, enquanto, no grupo controle, 60% dos pacientes podem evoluir para óbito nos dez anos, e a probabilidade de serem acometidos por complicações relacionadas ao DM tipo 2 é crescente. Com relação aos custos, ao final de dez anos, os pacientes que participaram da Estratégia Individual de Empoderamento Farmacoterapêutico (EIEF) tiveram um custo médio de UU$134,45 poupando a vida de 100% dos pacientes, e os pacientes do atendimento convencional um custo médio de UU$237,12 e 40% dos pacientes acompanhados chegariam ao final do ciclo com vida. Conclusão: a EIEF parece ser uma alternativa economicamente viável em longo prazo, bem como para a promoção do controle glicêmico.
Objectives: contribute to the data generation for the economic evaluation of pharmacotherapeutic empowerment strategies for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (type 2 DM). Method: This pharmacoeconomic study is nested in a clinical trial with non-randomized control that included patients ≥18 years old, registered in HIPERDIA. The patients were allocated to a Markov model according to the follow-up glycated hemoglobin values. The probabilities of the appearance of complications related to DM, including death, have been estimated for ten years. Each complication of type 2 DM had its cost established to determine the annual cost. Results: Among the participants in the intervention, there are no deaths caused by type 2 DM, and the progression of complications remains stable during the simulated years, whereas in the control group, 60% of the patients can progress to death in ten years and the probability of being affected by complications related to type 2 DM is increasing. Regarding costs, at the end of ten years, patients who participated in Individual Pharmacotherapeutic Empowerment Strategy (IPES) had an average cost of US$ 134.45, saving 100% of patient's lives, and conventional care patients cost an average of US$ 237.12 and 40% of the patients followed would reach the end of the life cycle. Conclusion: The IPES seems like an economically viable and long-term economic alternative and promotes glycemic control.