ABSTRACT
Context: Hemispherotomy is a surgical procedure for hemispheric disconnection. It is a technically demanding surgery. Our experience is presented here. Aims: To validate and compare the two techniques for hemispherotomy performed in patients with intractable epilepsies. Settings and Design: A retrospective study 2001-March 2007: Nineteen cases of hemispherotomies from a total of 462 cases operated for intractable epilepsy. Materials and Methods: All the cases operated for intractable epilepsy underwent a complete epilepsy surgery workup. Age range 4-23 years (mean 5.2 years), 14 males. The seizure frequency ranged from 2-200 episodes per day; four were in status; three in epilepsia partialis continua. The pathologies included Rasmussen's, hemimegelencephaly (unilateral hemispheric enlargement with severe cortical and subcortical changes), hemispheric cortical dysplasia, post-stroke, post-traumatic encephalomalacia and encephalopathy of unknown etiology. The techniques of surgery included vertical parasaggital approach and peri-insular hemispherotomy. Neuronavigation was used in seven cases. Results: Class I outcome [Engel's] was seen in 18 cases and Class II in one assessed at 32-198 weeks of follow-up. The four patients in status epilepticus had Class I outcome. Four patients had an initial worsening of weakness which improved to preoperative level in five to eight weeks. Power actually improved in three other patients at 32-36 weeks of follow-up, but hand grip weakness persisted. In all the other patients, power continued to be as in preoperative state. Cognitive profile improved in all patients and 11 cases returned back to school. Conclusions: Both techniques were equally effective, the procedure itself is very effective when indicated. Four of our cases were quite sick and were undertaken for this procedure on a semi-emergency basis.
ABSTRACT
Background: Outcome following epilepsy surgery has traditionally been measured in terms of relief of seizures. However, changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after surgery for intractable epilepsy are also important to document. There are no studies on the Indian population which assess the outcome of epilepsy surgery in terms of HRQOL. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective study on the patients undergoing epilepsy surgery for intractable seizures, between February 2004 and May 2006 at our center. All patients cleared for epilepsy surgery by the epilepsy surgery team were taken up for study. All patients Results: Thirty-six patients satisfying the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included in the analysis. Twenty-nine of these (Group 1) had good seizure outcome (Engel 1 and 2), while seven patients (Group 2) had poor seizure outcome (Engel 3 and 4) at six months. Overall, 77% of all study patients were completely seizure-free at follow-up. There was no baseline difference in the seven domains of QOLIE-31 between the two groups. There was very significant improvement (P value> 0.005 using paired sample T test) in all the domains of QOLIE-31 in the good outcome group after surgery. Health-related quality of life improvement was seen in all the domains in the poor outcome group also, however, it was statistically significant only for the following parameters: seizure worry, overall QOL, emotional wellbeing, energy fatigue and social functioning domains. Improvement in seizure worry, overall QOL, emotional wellbeing and social functioning was significantly more in Group 1 as compared to Group 2. Conclusion: Complete seizure-free state after surgery is associated with very significant improvement in HRQOL parameters. Several, but not all parameters of HRQOL as assessed by QOLIE-31, improved after surgery even in the poor seizure outcome group. The improvement in domains of seizure worry, overall QOL, emotional wellbeing and social functioning is significantly more in those patients in whom complete seizure-free state is achieved.