ABSTRACT
@#Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare providers have been in great fear due to the high risk of contracting COVID-19 infection at any time. This study aimed to determine the mediating role of resilience on the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and burnout in primary care healthcare providers in Malaysia. Methods: This was an online cross-sectional study involving 1280 healthcare providers aged 18 years and older from 30 government primary care clinics in Malaysia. We used the COVID-19 Fear Scale, the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory Scale, and the Short Brief Resilience Scale to collect data from the respondents. Smart-PLS was used to perform mediation analysis. Results: The mean age of the respondents was 36 years old and mean duration of working experience was 11 years. The majority of the respondents were female (82.4%) and Malays (82.3%). The study population consisted of nurses (47.4%), doctors (26%), medical assistants (11.9), healthcare assistant (7.1%), medical laboratory technicians (6.4%) and drivers(1.3).The results show that fear of COVID-19 positively predicts burnout. According to the results, resilience mediates the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and all the three burnout domains, namely personal burnout (β=0.175,p<0.001), work-related burnout (β=0.175,p<0.001) and client-related burnout (β=0.172,p<0.001). Additionally, resilience reduces the impact of COVID-19 fear on the three domains of burnout. Conclusion: Our study has reported a mediating effect of resilience on the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and burnout.
ABSTRACT
@#Introduction: As the first point of contact for those presenting with asthma symptoms, primary healthcare plays a crucial role in asthma management. This is a nationwide study of assessment of asthma symptom control and adherence to asthma medication among outpatients in public health clinics in Malaysia. Methods: This is a prospective, observational multicentre study (ASCOPE; NCT03804632). Data on asthma control, assessment of control symptoms, and adherence to treatment were collected from medical records and interviews of patients. The level of asthma control was assessed using the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Assessment of Symptom Control. Adherence of patient to medication for asthma was assessed through interview of patients using four questions adapted from the Malaysian Medication Adherence Scale. Results: Among the 1011 patients recruited, 416 (41%) had well controlled asthma, 388 (38%) were partly controlled, and 207 (21%) had uncontrolled asthma. Majority (81%) had mild asthma and all patients were on asthma medication. Most patients did not have spirometry data (97%) but underwent peak flow rate measurements (98%). Poor adherence occurred at all levels of asthma control but was worst among those with uncontrolled asthma. This was statistically significant across all four questions on adherence (p<0.05). For example, more patients with uncontrolled asthma forgot doses (56%) or stopped treatment (39%) than those with well-controlled asthma (44% and 27% respectively). Conclusions: Among Malaysian primary care patients with asthma, less than 50% had well-controlled asthma, and low adherence to treatment was common. More effort is needed to improve asthma control among patients in Malaysia, including those with mild asthma.