ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the therapeutic effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion by single and double B-Twin expandable spinal spacer with micro endoscopic discectomy (MED) for lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion accompanying degenerative instability.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From March 2006 to May 2008, 45 patients with lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion accompanying degenerative instability were admitted and managed with posterior lumbar interbody fusion by B-Twin expandable spinal spacer with MED. The patients were randomly assigned to treatment with single B-Twin (Single group, n = 24) or double B-Twin (Double group, n = 21). There were 16 males and 8 females, with an average age of 45.5 years (43 - 60 years) in Single group; 13 males and 8 females, with an average age of 43.7 years (44-61 years) in Double group. All the cases suffered from only one level disc protrusion, L(3-4) 2 cases, L(4-5) 29 cases and L₅-S₁ 14 cases. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with surgical time, blood loss, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores preoperatively, 1, 3, 6 month postoperatively. Oswestry disability questionnaire (ODI) of the preoperative, 1 month postoperative, and latest follow-up and the disk space heights.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Forty three patients were followed-up for 1 to 3 years after surgery. The mean surgical time of Double group was longer than Single group [(152 ± 32) min vs. (91 ± 15) min, P < 0.01]. The average blood loss in Double group was more than that in Single group [(146 ± 73) ml vs. (95 ± 58) ml, P < 0.01]. The mean time of hospital stay in Single group was similar to that in Double group [(11.0 ± 3.2) d vs. (10.9 ± 3.3) d, P > 0.05]. Both groups could keep the disk space heights till the last follow-up [(7.7 ± 1.8) mm vs. (8.5 ± 1.7) mm]. In the 6 months follow-up post operation, the VAS score decreased from (8.1 ± 1.8) to (2.0 ± 1.0) in Single group, and (8.1 ± 1.9) to (2.1 ± 1.0) in Double group. At the last follow-up, the ODI decreased from (36 ± 7)% to (10 ± 4)% in Single group and (37 ± 6)% to (9 ± 4)% in Double group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). All the cases achieved fusion at the last follow-up, 3 patients in Single group and 2 patients in Double group suffered from intractable low back pain. One of the fins broke in one patient without any uncomfortable feeling.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Compared with the management of lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion accompanying degenerative instability by double B-Twin expandable spinal spacer with micro endoscopic discectomy, the single B-twin can get similar clinical outcomes, but shorter surgical time, less blood loss and less medical costs.</p>