ABSTRACT
Objective:To develop a self-management scale for patients with ulcerative colitis and test its reliability and validity,so as to provide a measurement tool for evaluating the self-management level of patients with ulcerative colitis in China.Methods:Guided by the theory of self-management, combined with extensive literature review and semi-structured interview results, the initial item pool was formed, and the initial questionnaire was formed through expert consultation. 324 cases of ulcerative colitis in a third-class Hospital of Tianjin were investigated by convenience sampling.Results:The self-management scale of ulcerative colitis patients included 4 dimensions and 23 items. The content validity of each item was between 0.867 and 1,and the content validity index of the scale was 0.860. Four factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis,and the cumulative variance contribution rate of variance was 66.395%. The Cronbachs coefficient of overall scale was 0.937,while four dimensions was between 0.820 and 0.916. The retest reliability of the scale was 0.934 ( P<0.01) and the retest reliability of each dimension was between 0.914 and 0.950 ( P<0.01). Conclusions:The self-management scale of patients with ulcerative colitis has been developed. The scale includes four dimensions: disease treatment management,daily life management,psychosocial management and disease information management. It has 23 items in total and has good reliability and validity. It can be used to evaluate the self-management level of patients with ulcerative colitis.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of heated gel mattress(HGM) for prevention of heat loss on preterm infants with hypothermia during the transport systematically and objectively. Methods Systematic searches on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science CBM,CNKI,Wanfang and VIP were performed for randomized controlled trials or quasi-randomized control trials which explored the effects of HGM on prevention of hypothermia in premature infants relative to conventional alternatives. Studies were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria,extracting data and assessing quality. Then, Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis were performed by using RevMan 5.3 and TSA v0.9 software developed at the Copenhagen Clinical Trials Center in Denmark, independently. Results This systematic review included 10 studies which comprised 7 randomized controlled trials and 3 quasi-randomized control trials, encompassing 773 patients. The results of Meta-analysis showed that in HGM group admission temperature on neonatal intensive care unit (standardized mean difference was 0.63, 95% confidence interval was 0.40-0.87, P=0.00), incidence of hypothermia (relative risk was 0.73, 95% confidence interval was 0.57-0.93, P=0.01) and hyperthermia (relative risk was 1.82, 95% confidence interval was 1.31-2.54, P=0.00) compared with the control group had significantly statistical difference;however, there was no significant difference in admission temperature on EM or TWM group, mortality, sepsis, retinopathy of prematurity, intraventricular hemorrhage III/IV between two groups. TSA confirmed that the pooled results of admission temperature on NICU and hyperthermia were stable and reliable; but the combination of low-temperature incidence and mortality indicators suggested that the sample size was insufficient. Conclusions HGM is an effective rewarming intervention that can improve body temperature of hypothermic preterm infants during transport, reduce the incidence of hypothermia but not decrease the incidence of morbidity and complications. However, it is recommended that clinical monitoring of body temperature should be performed dynamically to decrease the potential risk of high fever and complications. In addition, due to the limitation of quantity and quality of included studies, its cost-effectiveness and far-reaching influence on long-term follow-up outcomes need further evaluation through clinical multicenter, large sample, high-quality research.
ABSTRACT
Objective To translate the English version of the Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale into Chinese,and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version. Methods The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of scale was tested among 480 nurses from Tianjin First Central Hospital. Results The revised Chinese version of the Nursing Professional Self-Efficacy Scale contained 19 entries, the Cronbach′s α coefficient was 0.95, the test-retest reliability was 0.91. Conclusions The revised Chinese version of the Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale has acceptable reliability and validity. It can be used to measure the Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy among nurses in China.
ABSTRACT
Objective To systematically evaluate the effects of prone position ventilation on newborn with respiratory distress syndrome.Methods We searched databases including PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane Library,Web of Science,CBM,CNKI,Wanfang and VIP.We included all randomized controlled trials and randomized crossover trials of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.Studies were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria,extracting data and assessing quality.Then RevMan 5.3 software was used to analyze the data.Results Ten studies included seven randomized controlled trials and three randomized crossover trials,and 500 patients were included.The results of meta-analysis showed that in prone position ventilation group SaO2[MD=2.41,95％CI(0.87,3.95),P=0.002],PaO2[MD=5.20,95％CI(3.04,7.36),P＜0.001],Pa2//FiO2[MD=24.40,95％CI(8.35,40.44),P=0.003],the risk of pneumothorax [RR =0.10,95％ CI (0.01,0.76),P=0.03] and intracranial hemorrhage [RR =0.41,95％ CI (0.20,0.83),P=0.01]and duration of mechanical ventilation [MD=-23.22,95％CI(-38.30,-8.14),P=0.003] compared with supine positiongroup had significantly statistical difference;however there was no significant difference in ventilator-associated pneumonia[RR=0.72,95％CI(0.48,1.09),P=0.12] between two groups.Conclusion Prone position ventilation is effective to improve SaO2,PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2,shorten duration of mechanical ventilation and reduce the risk of pneumothorax and intracranial hemorrhage in newborn with respiratory distress syndrome.While it could not effectively reduce incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia.Due to the limitations of the quality of studies included,multi-centered randomized controlled trials with large sample size are needed in the future to evaluate the effects of prone position ventilation on neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.
ABSTRACT
Objective To translate the English version of Type 2 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale(DSAS-2) into Chinese,and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of DSAS-2. Methods The DSAS-2 was translated and adapted according to Chinese culture following the translation and back-retranslation procedure.The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of DSAS-2 was tested among 294 patients with type 2 diabetes. Results The Chinese version of DSAS-2 included three subscales: Treated Differently (6 items), Blame and Judgment (7 items), and Self-stigma (6 items) and contained a total of 19 items.The Cronbach α coefficient of the Chinese version of DSAS-2 was 0.879,the Cronbach α coefficient of three factors was 0.832,0.815 and 0.844,respectively;the test-retest reliability was 0.835. The content validity index was 0.916. The scores of DSAS-2 correlated with the scores of Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire 8- Item Scale and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale (r =-0.452, 0.443, 0.412, P<0.01). Three factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis and could explain 55.75% of the total variance. Conclusions The Chinese version of DSAS-2 has acceptable reliability and validity,which can be used to evaluate stigma among patients with type 2 diabetes in China.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of clinical nursing path in the application of endoscopic colon polyps resection patients. Methods Computer retrieval Chinese database to search relevant randomised controlled trials or clinical controlled trials. Two authors independently screened paper,extracted data and conducted to evaluate quality of literature,finally the meta-analysis was used by the Revman5.3 to analyze the data. Results A total of 13 articles were included. The results of Meta analysis showed that: compared with control group, the CNP group had the significant advantage of a shorter average length of hospital stay(colon polyps group:WMD=0.02,95% CI-3.14--0.91,P<0.01);colon polyps group: WMD = 2.57, 95% CI-2.77--2.36, P < 0.01), the lower average inpatient expenditure (colon polyps group: SMD = 9.98, 95% CI-14.55--5.44, P < 0.01); colon polyps group:SMD=4.57,95% CI-7.37--1.77,P<0.01),the higher nursing satisfaction(OR=5.03,95% CI 3.21-7.90,P<0.01),the higher degree of mastering knowledge(OR=5.31,95% CI 2.08-13.55,P<0.01)and the lower postoperative complications(OR=0.18,95% CI 0.06-0.55,P<0.01). Conclusions Clinical nursing pathway in patients with endoscopic colon polyps resection application effect is superior to the traditional nursing method. Because the quality of literature contained was not high, we still need more large sample,randomized controlled trials of high quality to further verification.
ABSTRACT
Objective To establish a learning evaluation indexes systen of flipped teaching method,and provide the basis for evaluating academic performance of each student who majors in nursing.Methods The indexes were determined by Delphi method of two rounds of consultation involving 15 experts,and the weight of every index was set up by analytic hierarchy process.Results The response rates of questionnaire investigation for the two rounds of consultation were 13/15 and 12/13 respectively.The authority value of experts was 0.847.The Kendall concordance coefficients for the indexes of first-level,second-level and third-level were 0.373,0.258 and 0.595 respectively,P＜0.05.Finally,the evaluation indexes system including 3 first-level indexes,5 second-level indexes,and 6 third-level indexes was set up.Conclusions The results of the two rounds of expert consultation are reliable.The consistency of expert opinions is good.The study provides a scientific and systematic evaluation tool for evaluating nursing undergraduates' performance under flipped teaching.
ABSTRACT
Objective To develop a scale for measuring CHD patients' health belief and to rectify its reliability and validity.Methods The primary items were obtained through reviewing literature and semi-structured interviewing with CHD patients.After team discussion and experts evaluation,the pretesting scale was developed.Two hundred and sixty subjects were recruited in the first study to finish the questionnaire by convenience sampling.The reliability and validity of this scale were tested by exploratory factor analysis,reliability analysis and correlation analysis.Results It was found that eight common factors extracted by exploratory factor analysis.Factor loading of each item ranged between 0.489 and 0.850.The 8 factors explained for 60.698％ of total variance.The correlations between the subscales and the total scale were ranging from 0.811 to 0.876.The correlations between the subscales of the scale were ranging from 0.330 to 0.732.The Cronbach's α coefficients of the total scale was 0.802,and the subscales Cronbach's α coefficients were ranging from 0.684 to 0.834.Test-retest reliability was 0.880,and that of subscales were 0.673～0.841.Conclusions The newly developed coronary artery disease health belief scale has showed acceptable reliability and validity,which can be used as a useful tool for the assessment and intervention of patients' health belief.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the effect of auricular-plaster therapy combined with aromatherapy on anxiety and quality of life in patients with colorectal surgery.Methods A total of 135 patients with colorectal surgery were randomly divided into group A (auricular-plaster therapy combined with aromatherapy),group B(auricular-plaster therapy),group C (aromatherapy),group D(blank).Anxiety and life quality levels of four groups were determined by using self-rating anxiety scale(SAS),quality of life instruments for cancer patients (QLICP-CR)and were compared between four groups before and after intervention.Results The SAS and QLICP-CR scores of group A were lower than those of group B,group C and group D after intervention.The SAS and QLICP-CR scores of group B and group C were lower than that of group D after intervention.There were no statistical significant differences in SAS and QLICP-CR scores between group B and group C after intervention.Conclusions Auricular-plaster therapy combined with aromatherapy can effectively alleviate anxiety of patients with colorectal surgery and improve their quality of life,and the effect is better than that of auricular-plaster therapy and aromatherapy.