Ultrasonographic Findings of Mammographic Architectural Distortion

PURPOSE: To review the sonographic findings of various diseases showing architectural distortion depicted under mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected and reviewed architectural distortions observed under mammography at our health institution between 1 March 2004, and 28 February 2007. We collected 23 cases of sonographically-detected mammographic architectural distortions that confirmed lesions after surgical resection. The sonographic findings of mammographic architectural distortion were analyzed by use of the BI-RADS lexicon for shape, margin, lesion boundary, echo pattern, posterior acoustic feature and orientation. RESULTS: There were variable diseases that showed architectural distortion depicted under mammography. Fibrocystic disease was the most common presentation (n = 6), followed by adenosis (n = 2), stromal fibrosis (n = 2), radial scar (n = 3), usual ductal hyperplasia (n = 1), atypical ductal hyperplasia (n = 1) and mild fibrosis with microcalcification (n = 1). Malignant lesions such as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (n = 2), lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) (n = 2), invasive ductal carcinoma (n = 2) and invasive lobular carcinoma (n = 1) were observed. As ovserved by sonography, shape was divided as irregular (n = 22) and round (n = 1). Margin was divided as circumscribed (n = 1), indistinct (n = 7), angular (n = 1), microlobulated (n = 1) and sipculated (n = 13). Lesion boundary was divided as abrupt interface (n = 11) and echogenic halo (n = 12). Echo pattern was divided as hypoechoic (n = 20), anechoic (n = 1), hyperechoic (n = 1) and isoechoic (n = 1). Posterior acoustic feature was divided as posterior acoustic feature (n = 7), posterior acoustic shadow (n = 15) and complex posterior acoustic feature (n = 1). Orientation was divided as parallel (n = 12) and not parallel (n = 11). There were no differential sonographic findings between benign and malignant lesions. CONCLUSION: This study presented various sonographic findings of mammographic architectural distortion and that it is difficult to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions depicted under sonography. Pathological confirmation is needed for mammographic architectural distortion.

Ultrasonographic and Mammographic Findings of Nodular Sclerosing Adenosis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ultrasonographic and mammographic findings of cases of nodular adenosis. MATERIALS and METHODS: We evaluated 22 lesions with a pathologically proven nodular adenosis from five hospitals for three years. We excluded adenosis cases combined with other breast diseases. The findings of ultrasonography and mammography were retrospectively interpreted in consensus by two radiologists that were experienced in breast imaging according to the BI-RADS criteria. RESULTS: The age of the patients was 29-56 years with a mean age of 43.4 years. Ten lesions were biopsied with a 14-gauge core needle, seven lesions were biopsied with an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted mammotome and five lesions were removed by surgical excision. Mammography was performed in 15 patients and distinct abnormalities were seen in seven cases. These abnormalities consisted of an indistinct irregular mass, three circumscribed masses and three focal asymmetries. Calcifications were not seen in all of the masses. Ultrasonography was performed in 22 patients, revealing 13 irregular shaped lesions 8 oval shaped lesions and one round shape lesion. The margin was either circumscribed (n = 7) and not circumscribed (n = 15) in the lesions. The orientation of mass was parallel in 13 lesions and not parallel in 9 lesions. The boundary was an abrupt interface in all of the cases. The echogenecity of the mass was hypoechoic in 15 cases, isoechoic in 4 cases, hyperechoic in 2 cases and complex echogenic in one case. Nineteen of the cases showed no posterior feature and one case showed combined features. The final categories by the BI-RADS criteria were category 3 in three cases and category 4 in 19 cases (C4a 11, C4b 8). CONCLUSION: Nodular adenosis mostly presents as category 4 on ultrasonography. Therefore, a differential diagnosis with malignancy is difficult to determine. However, the findings of lesions highly suggestive of being malignant such as a spiculation or echogenic halo, are rare. On mammography, it is commonly obscured.

Periductal Mastitis in a Male Breast

Periductal mastitis and mammary duct ectasia are now considered as separate disease entities in the female breast, and these two diseases affect different age groups and have different etiologies and clinical symptoms. These two entities have very rarely been reported in the male breast and they have long been considered as the same disease as that in the female breast without any differentiation. We report here on the radiologic findings of a rare case of periductal mastitis that developed during the course of chemotherapy for lung cancer in a 50-year-old male. On ultrasonography, there was a partially defined mass with adjacent duct dilatation and intraductal hypoechogenicity, and this correlated with an immature abscess with a pus-filled, dilated duct and periductal inflammation on the pathologic examination.

Periductal Mastitis in a Male Breast

Periductal mastitis and mammary duct ectasia are now considered as separate disease entities in the female breast, and these two diseases affect different age groups and have different etiologies and clinical symptoms. These two entities have very rarely been reported in the male breast and they have long been considered as the same disease as that in the female breast without any differentiation. We report here on the radiologic findings of a rare case of periductal mastitis that developed during the course of chemotherapy for lung cancer in a 50-year-old male. On ultrasonography, there was a partially defined mass with adjacent duct dilatation and intraductal hypoechogenicity, and this correlated with an immature abscess with a pus-filled, dilated duct and periductal inflammation on the pathologic examination.

Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head after Bone Marrow Transplantation

PURPOSE: To retrospectively review finding of osteonecrosis of the femoral head after bone marrow transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the clinical and MR findings of osteonecrosis of the femoral head in 23 of 1112 patients who underwent marrow transplantation during a five-year follow-up period lasting from 1996 to 2000. RESULTS: Mean age at the time of diagnosis was 31 (range, 20-47) years, and the mean time from transplant to diagnosis was 17 months. All patients developed variable graft-versus-host disease and seventeen were treated with high-dose prednisolone and/or cysclosporin for severe acute or extensive chronic graft versus host disease. Osteonecrosis was diagnosed by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, which allowed early detection of disease assessment of its stage. At the time of diagnosis, 15 hips were at stage I, 28 at stage II, two at stage III, and none at stage IV, according to the international ARCO classification system. Osteonecrosis of femoral diaphyses, the lower lumbar spine, or pelvic bones in the MR field was also found to have occurred in 11 patients. Initial treatment was conservative: 21 hips underwent surgery [core decompression (n=10), vascularized fibular bone graft (n=5), and joint replacement (n=6)]. CONCLUSION: In patients receiving high-dose steroids for the treatment of graft-versus-host disease, MR screening might help detect osteonecrosis at an early stage.