Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
China Journal of Endoscopy ; (12): 94-98, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-609246

ABSTRACT

Objective To discuss the safety and efficacy of inserting ureterovesical reimplantation by means of laparoscopy associated with six-stitch suture.Methods There was an retrospective analysis on operation videos and clinical data for 16 participants of inserting ureterovesical reimplantation by means of laparoscopy associated with six-stitch suture with the period from March in 2012 to September in 2015. And these were statistically analyzed including the operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative drainage volume, removal time of drainage tube, admission time after operation and the incidence of postoperative complications of vesicoureteric reflux and stenosis.Results The operations of 16 participants were completed successfully without converting to open surgery. The operation time was 60 ~ 125 min (Mean time: 85 min); intraoperative bleeding volume was 20 ~ 50 ml (Mean volume: 32 ml); postoperative drainage volume was 60 ~ 400 ml (Mean volume: 106 ml); removal time of drainage tube was 3 ~ 6 d (Mean time: 4.2 d) and admission time after operation was 7 ~ 10 d (Mean time: 8.5 d). There was the follow-up with 6 ~ 18 months (Mean time: 12 months) for participants. No anastomotic stenosis was present. In addition, one participant was suffered from mild vesicoureteric relfux. And there was no aggravation during 18 months.Conclusions The inserting ureterovesical reimplantation by means of laparoscopy associated with six-stitch suture was safe and effective. It was found that the operation time was significantly shortened and the incidence of postoperative complications of vesicoureteric relfux and anastomotic stenosis was not increased. By contrast, the six-stitch suture could reduce the incidence of anastomotic stenosis.

2.
Chinese Journal of Urology ; (12): 258-261, 2014.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-446793

ABSTRACT

Objective To discuss the safety and effectiveness of the drainage of perinephric abscess with retroperitoneal laparoscopy.Methods The clinical data of 12 cases undergoing the drainage of perinephric abscess with retroperitoneal laparoscopy were analyzed retrospectively.There were 3 males and 9 females,with a mean age of 47 years.All the 12 cases presented with lumbar pain and fever,7 cases had chill,5 cases had irritative symptom of bladder,and 4 cases had nausea and vomiting.The average course was 9 d,and the average diameter was 6.4 cm.Four cases were in the left side,and 8 in the right side.The main complications included type-2 diabetes (5 cases),type-1 diabetes (1 case),kidney stones (2 cases) and systemic lupus erythematosus (1 case).All the 12 cases were treated with antibiotics.The indexes were recorded,including operative time,intraoperative blood loss,purulent fluid volume,postoperative indwelling time of the drainage tube,postoperative time of body temperature returned to normal,postoperative hospital stay,and complication rate.Results All the 12 operations were successful without peritoneal damage,kidney damage or other complications.The mean operative time was 56 (48-95) min,the mean intraoperative blood loss was 127 (60-150) ml,the mean intraoperative purulent fluid volume drawed out was 128 (120-230) ml,the mean postoperative indwelling time of the drainage tube was 9 (6-12) d,the mean postoperative time of body temperature returned to normal was 3 (2-4) d,and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 10 (7-12) d.All the patients were followed up for an average of 6.5 (6-12) months,no recurrence occured.Conclusions The drainage of perinephric abscess with retroperitoneal laparoscopy has the advantages of definite effectiveness,complete drainage,little injury and rapid recovery.The drainage of perinephric abscess with retroperitoneal laparoscopy by skilled urologists is safe.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL