Retrospective Analysis on the Clinical Differences of Children and Adolescents Treated for Acute Pediatric Poisoning in an Emergency Department?

PURPOSE: This study reports the clinical features of children and adolescents treated for acute poisoning at a regional emergency department (ED). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed children and adolescents (under 19 years) treated for poisoning in an emergency department (ED) from 2003 to 2012. Children range from 0 to 10 years and adolescents range from 11 to 18 years. Demographic data, poisonous material data, treatment, and outcome from poisoning were collected. RESULTS: There were 742 cases of pediatric poisoning during the study period. The distribution of patient ages was bimodal, with two peaks during 1~2 years and 17~18 years of age. The proportion of adolescents with acute poisoning increased from 22.7% (years 2003~2007) to 38% (years 2008~2013). Among children less than 11 years of age, various poisonous agents and therapeutic drugs comprised 43.9% of the total toxic substance subtypes. However, four types of toxic substances dominated among adolescents: acetaminophen, carbon monoxide, corrosives, and psychiatric drugs. Overall, 54.6% of acute intoxicated patients were asymptomatic (17.7% in adolescents). In addition, 25.8% of patients who wer children were not medically treated compared to 2.8% of adolescent patients. Gastric lavage, charcoal usage, and antidote therapy were performed more often in adolescents and enhanced elimination was only performed in adolescents. The discharge rate from the emergency department was 86.8% for children and 69.1% for adolescents. Also, 4.8% of adolescents were admitted into an intensive care unit but no patients died. CONCLUSION: The incidence of adolescent poisoning increased during the period examined. There were many clinical differences in acute poisoning between children and adolescents. Therefore, strategies to cope with acute poisoning according to age group are required.

Recent 10-Year Experience of One Regional Emergency Center and Recommendation for Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT)

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate current status, indications, and complications of hyperbaric oxygen therapy. METHODS: A retrospective investigation of patients who underwent hyperbaric oxygen therapy at a university medical center from September 2004 to August 2013 was conducted based on patients' medical records and results of an email survey for 99 emergency centers. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 233 patients underwent hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Indications for hyperbaric oxygen treatment of illness or injury were as follows: 1) 151 cases of acute carbon monoxide poisoning(65.4%), 2) flap wound management, including 42 cases(18.2%), 3) skin care transplanted, including 23 cases(10.4%), 4) Burger's disease, including 5 five cases(2.1%), respectively. Total application time* frequency was 1,088 and total time was 1,239 hours. Among 233 patients who underwent hyperbaric oxygen therapy, 32 patients(13.7%) had complications: 1) otalgia in 21 cases(9.0%), 2) mastoiditis? in six cases(2.6%), 3) hemotympanum in five cases(2.1%), respectively. There were only 8 emergency centers that currently had an operational hyperbaric oxygen chamber in 77 emergency centers(10.4%). CONCLUSION: Indications identified through this study showed difference from current indications worldwide. It seems necessary that physicians' perception regarding application of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for more indications be changed and improved. A hyperbaric chamber capable of providing respiratory assistance and intensive care is also needed. A good network for sharing treatment experiences and a specialized team for administration of hyperbaric oxygen therapy is also required.