ABSTRACT
Purpose@#Fractures of the capitellum of the humerus are relatively rare injuries, and the prevalence is known to be less than 1% of all elbow fractures. Since the capitellum forms an articular surface with the radial head, this fracture is considered to be an intra-articular fracture, and surgical treatment is required for the displaced fracture. Due to the rarity of this type of fracture, only a few studies on treatment have been published. We report the results of cases that underwent surgical treatment for capitellum fractures. @*Materials and Methods@#Through a retrospective review, patients who underwent surgical treatment for a capitellum fracture from January 2002 to January 2020, and who could be followed-up for at least 12 months and were over 16 years old were included. A total of 19 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation with K-wires and headless compression screws were included.Radiographic analysis was carried out using simple radiographs taken to investigate the stability of the joint and the union of fractures.Clinical results were analyzed using the range of motion of the elbow, visualized pain score, Mayo Elbow Performance score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, and postoperative complications were analyzed at the time of the final follow-up. @*Results@#The average age of the patients was 57.3 years, and their average follow-up time was 22.6 months. Most of them were type I (n=12) as per the Bryan–Morrey classification. The radiographic analysis showed that bony union was obtained at the final follow-up in all cases, and there was no case of joint instability. The results of the clinical analysis showed that average flexion contracture was 9.7° (min 0°–max 30°), average further flexion was 130.3° (min 90°–max 145°), and average range of motion was 120.5°, and the average visualized pain score at the final follow-up was 1.3 (min 0–max 3). At the final follow-up, the average MEPS was 85.5 (min 75–max 95) and the average DASH score was 27.6 (min 5–max 46), which was satisfactory. @*Conclusion@#With early rehabilitation, capitellum fractures can be treated well without complications if the joint surface is aligned congruently with open reduction and firm fixation by using K-wire or headless compression screws.
ABSTRACT
Purpose@#Various problems have been reported with tension-band wire (TBW) fixation. With the devel-opment of anatomical plates and the improvement of fixation forces, plate fixation is currently being performed for non-comminuted, displaced, transverse olecranon fractures (Mayo Type 2A). This study compared the usefulness of the above two procedures applied in non-comminuted, displaced, transverse olecranon fractures. @*Materials and Methods@#Fifty-three patients with Mayo Type 2A were studied retrospectively. Twenty-nine patients underwent TBW fixation, while the other 24 underwent plate fixation. The averageoutpatient follow-up period was 10 months for both groups. Both groups were analyzed radiologically and clinically. The radiological assessment included the time to bone union, joint stability, and presence of traumatic osteoarthritis at the final follow-up. The clinical assessment included the operation time,range of motion of the elbow joint, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, and the presence of postoperative complications. @*Results@#Both groups showed stable elbow joints, proper union of fractures, and no traumatic osteo-arthritis at the final follow-up. The range of motion for the TBW fixation group was 142° (range, 3°-145°), while that of the plate fixation group was 135° (range, 4°-139°) at the final follow-up (p=0.219). The MEPS was 98.2 and 97.7 for the TBW fixation and plate fixation groups, respectively (p=0.675). The DASH score was 10.7 and 13.9 for the TBW fixation and plate fixation groups, respectively. Both groups showed excellent results, and the differences were not statistically significant (p=0.289). @*Conclusion@#TBW fixation and plate fixation were compared in non-comminuted, displaced, transverse olecranon fractures, and good results were obtained without significant differences between the two groups. Hence, surgeons should choose a technique they are more confident with and can be applied more efficiently.
ABSTRACT
Purpose@#In the past 20 years, studies on extracorporeal shock wave therapy in myofascial pain syndrome have been conducted in various ways, but no studies have compared the effects of the radial and focused type directly. This study examined the clinical treatment effects of periscapular myofascial pain syndrome according to the type of extracorporeal shock wave. @*Materials and Methods@#From January 2018 to February 2019, 66 patients were diagnosed with periscapular myofascial pain syndrome and subjected to extracorporeal shock waves. Twenty-four patients were in the radial extracorporeal shock wave treatment group, and 42 patients were in the focused extracorporeal shock wave treatment group. Before starting treatment, the visual analog pain scale, Constant Murley scale, and UCLA score were examined. After six shock wave treatments were completed at intervals of one week, the visual analog pain scale, Constant Murley scale, and UCLA score were re-evaluated. @*Results@#The visual analog pain scale improved from pre-treatment 3.66 points to post-treatment 2.54 points in the radial extracorporeal shock wave treatment group (p=0.007), and improved from pre-treatment 3.26 points to post-treatment 2.52 points in the focused extracorporeal shock wave treatment group (p=0.010). For the shoulder function evaluation, the Constant Murley scale and UCLA score in the radial extracorporeal shock wave treatment group improved from 64.60 points and 24.96 points, respectively, before treatment to 71.76 points and 27.98 points after treatment, respectively (p<0.001, p=0.006). The Constant Murley scale and UCLA score in the focal extracorporeal shockwave treatment group improved from 64.06 points and 25.26 points, respectively, to 72.19 points and 28.80 points after treatment (p<0.001, p<0.001). @*Conclusion@#Both radial and focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy were effective in reducing pain and increasing the shoulder function in patients with periscapular myofascial pain syndrome.
ABSTRACT
Background@#Lospa posterior-stabilized (PS) Plus type is a modified version of Lospa PS, in which the polyethylene insert shape is modified to reinforce stability and prevent patella-post impingement compared to Lospa PS. However, studies comparing the clinical and radiographic results of the two designs have not been reported yet. This study aimed to compare the clinical results of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the existing PS type and the modified Lospa PS Plus type. @*Methods@#A retrospective study was performed on 558 knees of 342 patients who underwent TKA using the Lospa PS or PS Plus types and were followed up for at least 2 years. Cases were divided into two groups according to the implant used: 212 cases in the PS group and 346 cases in the PS Plus group. For clinical outcome assessment, knee range of motion (ROM), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and Knee Society Score (KSS) were recorded before surgery and at the 2-year follow-up. Radiographic outcomes were evaluated according to the American Knee Society method. The incidence of postoperative complications and survival rates were compared between the two groups. @*Results@#Both groups showed significant clinical improvement after surgery. The average KSS significantly improved from 53.4 points in the PS group and 52.3 points in the PS Plus group preoperatively to 91.3 points and 93.2 points after surgery, respectively (p < 0.001). The average WOMAC score improved from 50.4 points in the PS group and 52.3 points in the PS Plus group before surgery to 15.6 points and 14.8 points after surgery, respectively (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in ROM, the alignment of the lower limbs, and the implant position after surgery. The complication rates were also similar between the groups (p = 0.167). @*Conclusions@#The Lospa PS Plus model is a modified design that improves the post structure from the previous PS type. Compared to the PS type, the PS Plus type showed similar statistical results at 2-year follow-up and good clinical results. The short-term average survival rate was over 98%, showing promising results.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study is to determine the role of serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) on hip fracture development by retrospectively analyzing the relationship between vitamin D and PTH levels and hip fracture prevalence. METHODS: Among 288 patients over 50 years of age, 113 patients with hip fracture and 111 controls without fracture were analyzed after excluding patients with conditions affecting bone metabolism. Bone mineral density and serum biochemical markers were measured, while demographic data were obtained. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25-[OH]D) and PTH levels: LowD+LowP (low 25[OH]D and PTH); LowD+HighP, (low 25[OH]D and high PTH); HighD+LowP (high 25[OH]D and low PTH); and HighD+HighP, patients with (high 25[OH]D and PTH). Measured values and percentages of patients with hip fracture in each group were then determined and compared. RESULTS: The number of patients included in the LowD+LowP, LowD+HighP, HighD+LowP, and HighD+HighP groups was 116, 17, 87, and 4, while the percentages of patients with hip fracture in the same groups were 60.3%, 88.2%, 27.6%, and 100%, respectively. The percentage of hip fracture was significantly lower in the LowD+LowP than the LowD+HighP group (P=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low serum 25(OH)D and PTH levels showed lower hip fracture prevalence, indicating the potential protective role of low PTH levels on bone health in patients with vitamin D deficiency. Therefore, clinicians should pay more attention to the possibility of fractures in patients with vitamin D deficiency who present with high PTH levels.