Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion ; (12): 1265-1268, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-238195

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the efficacy differences between abdominal acupuncture and western medication for diarrhea irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Sixty-one patients with IBS-D were randomly assigned into an acupuncture group (30 cases after 1 dropping) and a western medication group (28 cases after 2 dropping). Acupuncture was used atpoints [Zhongwan (CV 12), Xiawan (CV 10), Qihai (CV 6), Guanyuan (CV 4)],points [bilateral Huaroumen (ST 24), Wailing (ST 26)],point [bilateral Daheng (SP 15)], once every other day, 3 times a week. Pinaverium bromide tablet was used orally in the western medication group, 50 mg a time, 3 times a day. All the treatment was given for 4 weeks in the two groups. IBS symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) and clinical symptom scores for abdominal pain and distension, diarrhea, poor stool output, defecation urgency and stool abnormality were observed before and after the treatment as well as 3 months after treatment. Adverse reactions were recorded and the effects were evaluated.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>①After treatment and at follow-up, the IBS-SSS scores of the two groups were lower than those before treatment (all<0.01). Compared with the western medication group, the scores and the improvements between the two time points and before treatment were better in the acupuncture group (<0.05,<0.01). ②The symptom scores in the two groups after treatment were lower than those before treatment including abdominal pain, abdominal distension, diarrhea, poor stool output, defecation urgency and stool abnormality (<0.05,<0.01), and the scores of abdominal pain, abdominal distension, diarrhea, poor stool output and stool abnormality in the acupuncture group were lower than those in the western medication group (<0.05,<0.01). ③The total effective rate and the cured and remarkable effective rate of the acupuncture group were higher than those of the western medication group [(86.7% (26/30) vs 64.3% (18/28),<0.05; 70.0% (21/30) vs 35.7% (10/28),<0.01)], and the therapeutic efficacy of the acupuncture group was better than that of the western medication group (<0.05). There was no adverse reaction.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Abdominal acupuncture is more effective for IBS-D than western medication and can relieve abdominal pain, abdominal distension, diarrhea, poor stool output, stool abnormality, with long-term effect.</p>

2.
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing ; (36): 747-750, 2016.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-486625

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate health beliefs and fluid status in diabetic peritoneal dialysis patients, to explore the relation between fluid status and health beliefs in diabetic peritoneal dialysis patients. Methods The data were collected from the peritoneal dialysis center in Ningxia Medical University General Hospital from January 2014 through January 2015. A total of 64 diabetic peritoneal dialysis patients were recruited and investigated with health beliefs scale, fluid status and laboratory index, the influencing factors were analyzed with Logistic regression. Results Levels of perceived barriers in diabetic peritoneal dialysis patients was the lowest. The score of perceived barriers, levels of albumin and daily water intake in pedal edema diabetic peritoneal dialysis patients were 35.34±10.31, (29.90±4.51) g/L,(860.34±516.71) ml/d, and the results in the non-pedal edema patients were 31.67±12.47, (32.72±6.87) g/L, (872.22±271.85) ml/d, the difference was significant (t=-1.99,2.09,-3.07, P<0.05 or 0.01). Perceived barriers in diabetic peritoneal dialysis patients was positively correlated with edematous level (r=0.16,P<0.05) and perceived capacity balancing was negatively correlated with edematous level (r=-0.25,P<0.05). Regression analysis showed that marital status,dialysis age,daily water intake and perceived barriers were the main factors influencing fluid control in diabetic peritoneal dialysis patients. Conclusions Fluid control in diabetic peritoneal dialysis patients is affected by their health beliefs, this indicates that diabetic peritoneal dialysis patients must have insufficient awareness of fluid status and fluid adherence. It is suggested that they should establish comprehensive health beliefs.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL