Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy ; (12): 907-911, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-995343

ABSTRACT

Objective:To study the safety and efficacy of hiatal hernia-endoscopic submucosal dissection (HH-ESD) for the treatment of giant hiatal hernia (>3 cm in length) complicated with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).Methods:Patients with giant hiatal hernia complicated with refractory GERD who voluntarily received HH-ESD at the Digestive Endoscopy Center of the Affiliated People's Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University from April 2018 to March 2020 were included in the clinical study. The completion of HH-ESD and the occurrence of complications were observed, and the changes of indicators before and after the treatment were observed, including gastroesophageal reflux disease-health related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) score, gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERD-Q) score, endoscopy results, 24 h esophageal pH monitoring results, esophageal high-resolution manometry results and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) usage.Results:Data of 10 patients were collected during the study, with a medical history of 2-10 years. All patients successfully underwent HH-ESD treatment. No adverse events such as perforation and massive bleeding occurred during the operation, and the hospital stay was 6-12 days. Dysphagia occurred in 3 cases after the operation, which was relieved spontaneously within 3 or 6 months. The preoperative GERD-HRQL scores ranged from 19 to 29, which were reduced to 0-14 and 0-8 at 3 and 12 months after the operation, respectively. The preoperative GERD-Q score was 9-17, and the scores at 3 and 12 months after the operation were all 6-9, which were significantly lower than those before. Gastroscopy showed that esophagitis was improved in all patients, hernia sac was reduced, and Hill grade was reduced compared with that before. The preoperative DeMeester score was 30.3-247.1, and the postoperative 12-month score was 0.2-29.9, which was significantly lower than that before. The long diameter of hiatal hernia was 3.0-6.0 cm before the operation and 0-5.0 cm at 12 months after, which was smaller than that before. At 12 months of the follow-up, 7 patients had stopped PPI, and the remaining 3 had changed to intermittent oral PPI.Conclusion:Preliminary results show that HH-ESD is safe and effective for the treatment of giant hiatal hernia complicated with refractory GERD.

2.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy ; (12): 563-567, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-756284

ABSTRACT

Objective To study the safety and efficacy of peroral endoscopic cardial constriction (PECC) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods A total of 27 patients with GERD who visited the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University from August 2016 to December 2017 and met the inclusion criteria received PECC. The 24 h esophageal pH-resistance monitoring ( DeMeester ) scores, GERD health-related quality of life ( GERD-HRQL ) scores, GERD-questionnaires ( GERD-Q ) symptom scores and clinical efficacy before and after operation were compared. Results DeMeester score at 3 months ( Z=-6. 940, P=0. 001) and 6 months ( Z=-6. 307, P=0. 001) after treatment, GERD-HRQL score at 3 months ( t=11. 499, P=0. 001) and 6 months ( t=10. 959, P=0. 001) as well as GERD-Q symptom score at 3 months ( t=30. 647, P=0. 001) and 6 months ( t=27. 217, P =0. 001) after surgery significantly decreased, compared with those before. The curative rates were 81. 5% ( 22/27) and 77. 8%(21/27) at 3 months and 6 months after operation. Conclusion PECC, a new method for the treatment of GERD with good short-term effect, safety and feasibility,can be recommended for clinical application.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL